1887

Abstract

The standalone regulator RofA is a positive regulator of the pilus locus in . Found in only certain genotypes, RofA has been reported to regulate other virulence factors, although its role in the globally dominant 1 is unclear. Given the recent emergence of a new 1 (M1) toxigenic lineage that is distinguished by three non-synonymous SNPs in , we characterized the regulon in six 1 strains that are representative of the two contemporary major 1 lineages (M1 and M1) using RNAseq analysis, and then determined the specific role of the M1-specific SNPs. Deletion of in three M1 strains led to altered expression of 14 genes, including six non-pilus locus genes. In M1 strains, deletion of led to altered expression of 16 genes, including nine genes that were unique to M1. Only the pilus locus genes were common to the RofA regulons of both lineages, while transcriptomic changes varied between strains even within the same lineage. Although introduction of the three SNPs into did not impact gene expression in an M1 strain, reversal of three SNPs in an M1 strain led to an unexpected number of transcriptomic changes that in part recapitulated transcriptomic changes seen when deleting RofA in the same strain. Computational analysis predicted that interactions with a key histidine residue in the PRD domain of RofA would differ between M1 and M1. RofA is a positive regulator of the pilus locus in all 1 strains but effects on other genes are strain- and lineage-specific, with no clear, common DNA binding motif. The SNPs in that characterize M1 may impact regulation of RofA; whether they alter phosphorylation of the RofA PRD domain requires further investigation.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Medical Research Council (Award MR/P022669/1)
    • Principle Award Recipient: ShiraneeSriskandan
  • This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. This article was made open access via a Publish and Read agreement between the Microbiology Society and the corresponding author’s institution.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/mgen/10.1099/mgen.0.001159
2023-12-20
2024-11-06
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/mgen/9/12/mgen001159.html?itemId=/content/journal/mgen/10.1099/mgen.0.001159&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Lynskey NN, Jauneikaite E, Li HK, Zhi X, Turner CE et al. Emergence of dominant toxigenic M1T1 Streptococcus pyogenes clone during increased scarlet fever activity in England: a population-based molecular epidemiological study. Lancet Infect Dis 2019; 19:1209–1218 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Beckert S, Kreikemeyer B, Podbielski A. Group A streptococcal rofA gene is involved in the control of several virulence genes and eukaryotic cell attachment and internalization. Infect Immun 2001; 69:534–537 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Li HK, Zhi X, Vieira A, Whitwell HJ, Schricker A et al. Characterization of emergent toxigenic M1UK Streptococcus pyogenes and associated sublineages. Microb Genom 2023; 9: [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Davies MR, Keller N, Brouwer S, Jespersen MG, Cork AJ et al. Detection of Streptococcus pyogenes M1UK in Australia and characterization of the mutation driving enhanced expression of superantigen SpeA. Nat Commun 2023; 14:1051 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Abbot EL, Smith WD, Siou GPS, Chiriboga C, Smith RJ et al. Pili mediate specific adhesion of Streptococcus pyogenes to human tonsil and skin. Cell Microbiol 2007; 9:1822–1833 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Fogg GC, Gibson CM, Caparon MG. The identification of rofA, a positive-acting regulatory component of prtF expression: use of an m gamma delta-based shuttle mutagenesis strategy in Streptococcus pyogenes . Mol Microbiol 1994; 11:671–684 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Granok AB, Parsonage D, Ross RP, Caparon MG. The RofA binding site in Streptococcus pyogenes is utilized in multiple transcriptional pathways. J Bacteriol 2000; 182:1529–1540 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Kreikemeyer B, McIver KS, Podbielski A. Virulence factor regulation and regulatory networks in Streptococcus pyogenes and their impact on pathogen-host interactions. Trends Microbiol 2003; 11:224–232 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Kratovac Z, Manoharan A, Luo F, Lizano S, Bessen DE. Population genetics and linkage analysis of loci within the FCT region of Streptococcus pyogenes . J Bacteriol 2007; 189:1299–1310 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Lynskey NN, Goulding D, Gierula M, Turner CE, Dougan G et al. RocA truncation underpins hyper-encapsulation, carriage longevity and transmissibility of serotype M18 group A streptococci. PLoS Pathog 2013; 9:e1003842 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Turner CE, Kurupati P, Jones MD, Edwards RJ, Sriskandan S. Emerging role of the interleukin-8 cleaving enzyme SpyCEP in clinical Streptococcus pyogenes infection. J Infect Dis 2009; 200:555–563 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 2014; 30:2114–2120 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Clausen PTLC, Aarestrup FM, Lund O. Rapid and precise alignment of raw reads against redundant databases with KMA. BMC Bioinformatics 2018; 19:307 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Danecek P, Auton A, Abecasis G, Albers CA, Banks E et al. The variant call format and VCFtools. Bioinformatics 2011; 27:2156–2158 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Robinson JT, Thorvaldsdóttir H, Winckler W, Guttman M, Lander ES et al. Integrative genomics viewer. Nat Biotechnol 2011; 29:24–26 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Anders S, Pyl PT, Huber W. HTSeq--a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics 2015; 31:166–169 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Liao Y, Smyth GK, Shi W. featureCounts: an efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features. Bioinformatics 2014; 30:923–930 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Love M, Anders S, Huber W. Differential analysis of count data–the Deseq2 package. Genome Biol 2014; 15:10–1186 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Robinson MD, McCarthy DJ, Smyth GK. edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 2010; 26:139–140 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Arndt D, Grant JR, Marcu A, Sajed T, Pon A et al. PHASTER: a better, faster version of the PHAST phage search tool. Nucleic Acids Res 2016; 44:W16–W21 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Rosinski-Chupin I, Sauvage E, Fouet A, Poyart C, Glaser P. Conserved and specific features of Streptococcus pyogenes and Streptococcus agalactiae transcriptional landscapes. BMC Genomics 2019; 20:236 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Alam FM, Turner CE, Smith K, Wiles S, Sriskandan S. Inactivation of the CovR/S virulence regulator impairs infection in an improved murine model of Streptococcus pyogenes naso-pharyngeal infection. PLoS One 2013; 8:e61655 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Hildebrand A, Remmert M, Biegert A, Söding J. Fast and accurate automatic structure prediction with HHpred. Proteins 2009; 77:128–132 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Wu S, Zhang Y. LOMETS: a local meta-threading-server for protein structure prediction. Nucleic Acids Res 2007; 35:3375–3382 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Potter SC, Luciani A, Eddy SR, Park Y, Lopez R et al. HMMER web server: 2018 update. Nucleic Acids Res 2018; 46:W200–W204 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Li Z, Jaroszewski L, Iyer M, Sedova M, Godzik A. FATCAT 2.0: towards a better understanding of the structural diversity of proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 2020; 48:W60–W64 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Martí-Renom MA, Stuart AC, Fiser A, Sánchez R, Melo F et al. Comparative protein structure modeling of genes and genomes. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 2000; 29:291–325 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Melo F, Sali A. Fold assessment for comparative protein structure modeling. Protein Sci 2007; 16:2412–2426 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Benkert P, Biasini M, Schwede T. Toward the estimation of the absolute quality of individual protein structure models. Bioinformatics 2011; 27:343–350 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Williams CJ, Headd JJ, Moriarty NW, Prisant MG, Videau LL et al. MolProbity: more and better reference data for improved all-atom structure validation. Protein Sci 2018; 27:293–315 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Calfee G, Danger JL, Jain I, Miller EW, Sarkar P et al. Identification and characterization of serotype-specific variation in Group A Streptococcus pilus expression. Infect Immun 2018; 86:e00792-17 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Zeng S, Liu Y, Wu M, Liu X, Shen X et al. Identification and validation of reference genes for quantitative real-time PCR normalization and its applications in lycium. PLoS One 2014; 9:e97039 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Hondorp ER, Hou SC, Hempstead AD, Hause LL, Beckett DM et al. Characterization of the Group A Streptococcus Mga virulence regulator reveals a role for the C-terminal region in oligomerization and transcriptional activation. Mol Microbiol 2012; 83:953–967 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Hondorp ER, McIver KS. The Mga virulence regulon: infection where the grass is greener. Mol Microbiol 2007; 66:1056–1065 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Tsvetanova B, Wilson AC, Bongiorni C, Chiang C, Hoch JA et al. Opposing effects of histidine phosphorylation regulate the AtxA virulence transcription factor in Bacillus anthracis . Mol Microbiol 2007; 63:644–655 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Pal D, Chakrabarti P. Non-hydrogen bond interactions involving the methionine sulfur atom. J Biomol Struct Dyn 2001; 19:115–128 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Podbielski A, Woischnik M, Leonard BA, Schmidt KH. Characterization of nra, a global negative regulator gene in group A streptococci. Mol Microbiol 1999; 31:1051–1064 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Fogg GC, Caparon MG. Constitutive expression of fibronectin binding in Streptococcus pyogenes as a result of anaerobic activation of rofA. J Bacteriol 1997; 179:6172–6180 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Gordon BRG, Li Y, Cote A, Weirauch MT, Ding P et al. Structural basis for recognition of AT-rich DNA by unrelated xenogeneic silencing proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011; 108:10690–10695 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Hadjifrangiskou M, Koehler TM. Intrinsic curvature associated with the coordinately regulated anthrax toxin gene promoters. Microbiology 2008; 154:2501–2512 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Tesorero RA, Yu N, Wright JO, Svencionis JP, Cheng Q et al. Novel regulatory small RNAs in Streptococcus pyogenes . PLoS One 2013; 8:e64021 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Magalhães PP, Paulino TP, Thedei G, Jr Ciancaglini P. Kinetic characterization of P-type membrane ATPase from Streptococcus mutans . Comp Biochem Physiol B, Biochem Mol Biol 2005; 140:589–597 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Vlaminckx BJM, Schuren FHJ, Montijn RC, Caspers MPM, Fluit AC et al. Determination of the relationship between group A streptococcal genome content, M type, and toxic shock syndrome by a mixed genome microarray. Infect Immun 2007; 75:2603–2611 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Martín MG, Sender PD, Peirú S, de Mendoza D, Magni C. Acid-inducible transcription of the operon encoding the citrate lyase complex of Lactococcus lactis Biovar diacetylactis CRL264. J Bacteriol 2004; 186:5649–5660 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Srinivasan V, Morowitz HJ. Ancient genes in contemporary persistent microbial pathogens. Biol Bull 2006; 210:1–9 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/mgen/10.1099/mgen.0.001159
Loading
/content/journal/mgen/10.1099/mgen.0.001159
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF

Supplementary material 2

EXCEL
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error