Skip to content
1887

Abstract

Respiratory viral infections are a major global clinical problem, and rapid, cheap, scalable and agnostic diagnostic tests that capture genome-level information on viral variation are urgently needed. Metagenomic approaches would be ideal, but remain currently limited in that much of the genetic content in respiratory samples is human, and amplifying and sequencing the viral/pathogen component in an unbiased manner is challenging. PCR-based tests, including those which detect multiple pathogens, are already widely used, but do not capture information on strain-level variation; tests with larger viral repertoires are also expensive on a per-test basis. One intermediate approach is the use of large panels of viral probes or ‘baits’, which target or ‘capture’ sequences representing complete genomes amongst several different common viral pathogens; these are then amplified, sequenced and analysed with a sequence analysis workflow. Here we evaluate one such commercial bait capture method (the Twist Bioscience Respiratory Virus Research Panel) and sequence analysis workflow (OneCodex), using control (simulated) and patient samples head-to-head with a validated multiplex PCR clinical diagnostic test (BioFire FilmArray). We highlight the limited sensitivity and specificity of the joint Twist Bioscience/OneCodex approach, which are further reduced by shortening workflow times and increasing sample throughput to reduce per-sample costs. These issues with performance may be driven by aspects of both the laboratory (e.g. capacity to enrich for viruses present in low numbers), bioinformatics methods used (e.g. a limited viral reference database) and thresholds adopted for calling a virus as present or absent. As a result, this workflow would require further optimization prior to any implementation for respiratory virus characterization in a routine diagnostic healthcare setting.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre
    • Principle Award Recipient: NotApplicable
  • This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. This article was made open access via a Publish and Read agreement between the Microbiology Society and the corresponding author’s institution.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/mgen/10.1099/mgen.0.001103
2023-09-07
2025-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/mgen/9/9/mgen001103.html?itemId=/content/journal/mgen/10.1099/mgen.0.001103&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Kapel N, Kalimeris E, Lumley S, Decano A, Rodger G et al.Evaluation of sequence hybridization for respiratory viruses using the twist Bioscience respiratory virus research panel and the Onecodex respiratory virus sequence analysis Workflow Figshare 2023 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Jin X, Ren J, Li R, Gao Y, Zhang H et al. Global burden of upper respiratory infections in 204 countries and territories, from 1990 to 2019. EClinicalMedicine 2021; 37:100986 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Meredith LW, Hamilton WL, Warne B, Houldcroft CJ, Hosmillo M et al. Rapid implementation of SARS-CoV-2 sequencing to investigate cases of health-care associated COVID-19: a prospective genomic surveillance study. Lancet Infect Dis 2020; 20:1263–1272 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Sanderson T, Barrett JC. Variation at Spike position 142 in SARS-CoV-2 Delta genomes is a technical artifact caused by dropout of a sequencing amplicon. Wellcome Open Res 2021; 6:305 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Rehn A, Braun P, Knüpfer M, Wölfel R, Antwerpen MH et al. Catching SARS-CoV-2 by sequence hybridization: a comparative analysis. mSystems 2021; 6:e0039221 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Kim KW, Deveson IW, Pang CNI, Yeang M, Naing Z et al. Respiratory viral co-infections among SARS-CoV-2 cases confirmed by virome capture sequencing. Sci Rep 2021; 11:3934 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Fung B, Gopez A, Servellita V, Arevalo S, Ho C et al. Direct comparison of SARS-CoV-2 analytical limits of detection across seven molecular assays. J Clin Microbiol 2020; 58:e01535-20 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/mgen/10.1099/mgen.0.001103
Loading
/content/journal/mgen/10.1099/mgen.0.001103
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Loading data from figshare Loading data from figshare
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error