1887

Microbial Genomics logo

Volume 7, Issue 9

Comparative molecular evolution of chitinases in ascomycota with emphasis on mycoparasitism lifestyle Open Access

Abstract

Chitinases are involved in multiple aspects of fungal life cycle, such as cell wall remodelling, chitin degradation and mycoparasitism lifestyle. To improve our knowledge of the chitinase molecular evolution of Ascomycota, the gene family of 72 representatives of this phylum was identified and subjected to phylogenetic, evolution trajectory and selective pressure analyses. Phylogenetic analysis showed that the chitinase gene family size and enzyme types varied significantly, along with species evolution, especially for groups B and C. In addition, two new subgroups, C3 and C4, are recognized in group C chitinases. Random birth and death testing indicated that gene expansion and contraction occurred in most of the taxa, particularly for species in the order Hypocreales (class Sordariomycetes). From an enzyme function point of view, we speculate that group A chitinases are mainly involved in species growth and development, while the expansion of genes in group B chitinases is related to fungal mycoparasitic and entomopathogenic abilities, and, to a certain extent, the expansion of genes in group C chitinases seems to be correlated with the host range broadening of some plant-pathogenic fungi in Sordariomycetes. Further selection pressure testing revealed that chitinases and the related amino acid sites were under positive selection in the evolutionary history, especially at the nodes sharing common ancestors and the terminal branches of Hypocreales. These results give a reasonable explanation for the size and function differences of chitinase genes among ascomycetes, and provide a scientific basis for understanding the evolutionary trajectories of chitinases, particularly that towards a mycoparasitic lifestyle.

  • Received:
  • Accepted:
  • Published Online:
Keyword(s): ascomycota chitinases , episodic selection , mycoparasitism and phylogeny
Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • national natural science foundation of china (Award 62002051)
    • Principle Award Recipient: ChaoWang
  • national natural science foundation of china (Award 31570018, 31870012)
    • Principle Award Recipient: Wen-YingZhuang
  • national basic research program of china (973 program) (Award 2017YFD0200600)
    • Principle Award Recipient: Wen-YingZhuang
© 2021 The Authors
  • This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/mgen/10.1099/mgen.0.000646
2021-09-13
2024-04-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/mgen/7/9/mgen000646.html?itemId=/content/journal/mgen/10.1099/mgen.0.000646&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Karlsson M, Stenlid J. Comparative evolutionary histories of the fungal chitinase gene family reveal non-random size expansions and contractions due to adaptive natural selection. Evol Bioinform Online 2008; 4:47–60
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Bolar JP, Norelli JL, Wong KW, Hayes CK, Harman GE et al. Expression of endochitinase from Trichoderma harzianum in transgenic apple increases resistance to apple scab and reduces vigor. Phytopathology 2000; 90:72–77 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  3. de la Cruz J, Hidalgo-Gallego A, Lora JM, Benitez T, Pintor-Toro JA et al. Isolation and characterization of three chitinases from Trichoderma harzianum. Eur J Biochem 1992; 206:859–867 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Emani C, Garcia JM, Lopata-Finch E, Pozo MJ, Uribe P et al. Enhanced fungal resistance in transgenic cotton expressing an endochitinase gene from Trichoderma virens. Plant Biotechnol J 2003; 1:321–336 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  5. García I, Lora JM, de la Cruz J, Benítez T, Llobell A et al. Cloning and characterization of a chitinase (CHIT42) cDNA from the mycoparasitic fungus Trichoderma harzianum. Curr Genet 1994; 27:83–89 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Gentile A, Deng Z, La Malfa S, Distefano G, Domina F et al. Enhanced resistance to Phoma tracheiphila and Botrytis cinerea in transgenic lemon plants expressing a Trichoderma harzianum chitinase gene. Plant Breeding 2007; 126:146–151 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Seidl V, Huemer B, Seiboth B, Kubicek CP. A complete survey of Trichoderma chitinases reveals three distinct subgroups of family 18 chitinases. FEBS J 2005; 272:5923–5939 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Kubicek CP, Herrera-Estrella A, Seidl-Seiboth V, Martinez DA, Druzhinina IS et al. Comparative genome sequence analysis underscores mycoparasitism as the ancestral life style of Trichoderma. Genome Biol 2011; 12:R40 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Seidl-Seiboth V et al. Molecular evolution of Trichoderma chitinases. Gupta V. eds In Biotechnology and Biology of Trichoderma Amsterdam, Boston: Elsevier; 2014 pp 67–78
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Seidl V. Chitinases of filamentous fungi: aA large group of diverse proteins with multiple physiological functions. Fung Biol Rev 2008; 22:36–42
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Shah PA, Pell JK. Entomopathogenic fungi as biological control agents. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2003; 61:413–423 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Woo SL, Ruocco M, Vinale F, Nigro M, Marra R et al. Trichoderma-based products and their widespread use in agriculture. Open Mycology Journal 2014; 8:71–126
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Wang C, Zhuang W. Evaluating effective Trichoderma isolates for biocontrol of Rhizoctonia solani causing root rot of Vigna unguiculata. Journal of Integrative Agriculture 2019; 18:2–9
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Wang C, Zhuang W. Carbon metabolic profiling of Trichoderma strains provides insight into potential ecological niches. Mycologia 2020; 112:213–223 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Druzhinina IS, Seidl-Seiboth V, Herrera-Estrella A, Horwitz BA, Kenerley CM et al. Trichoderma: the genomics of opportunistic success. Nat Rev Microbiol 2011; 9:749–759 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Herrera-Estrella A, Chet I. The biological control agent Trichoderma from fundamentals to applications. Arora D, Bridge P. eds In Handbook of Fungal Biotechnology, 2nd. edn New York: CRC Press; 2003 pp 147–156
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Howell CR. Mechanisms employed by Trichoderma species in the biological control of plant diseases: the history and evolution of current concepts. Plant Dis 2003; 87:4–10 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Ihrmark K, Asmail N, Ubhayasekera W, Melin P, Stenlid J et al. Comparative molecular evolution of trichoderma chitinases in response to mycoparasitic interactions. Evol Bioinform Online 2010; 6:1–26EBO.S4198 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z et al. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 1997; 25:3389–3402 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Schäffer AA, Aravind L, Madden TL, Shavirin S, Spouge JL et al. Improving the accuracy of PSI-BLAST protein database searches with composition-based statistics and other refinements. Nucleic Acids Res 2001; 29:2994–3005 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Marchler-Bauer A, Bo Y, Han L, He J, Lanczycki CJ et al. CDD/SPARCLE: functional classification of proteins via subfamily domain architectures. Nucleic Acid Res 2017; 45:D200–D203
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Marchler-Bauer A, Bryant SH. CD-Search: protein domain annotations on the fly. Nucleic Acids Res 2004; 32:W327–W331 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Katoh K, Rozewicki J, Yamada KD. MAFFT online service: multiple sequence alignment, interactive sequence choice and visualization. Brief Bioinform 2019; 20:1160–1166 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Guindon S, Dufayard J-F, Lefort V, Anisimova M, Hordijk W et al. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of Phyml 3.0. Syst Biol 2010; 59:307–321 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Swofford DL. PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (and other methods),Version 4.0b10 Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer; 2002
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Sanderson MJ. r8s: inferring absolute rates of molecular evolution and divergence times in the absence of a molecular clock. Bioinformatics 2003; 19:301–302 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Taylor TN, Hass H, Kerp H, Krings M, Hanlin RT. Perithecial ascomycetes from the 400 million year old rhynie chert: an example of ancestral polymorphism. Mycologia 2005; 97:269–285 [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Lücking R, Huhndorf S, Pfister DH, Plata ER, Lumbsch HT. Fungi evolved right on track. Mycologia 2009; 101:810–822 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Zhang W. Introgression and gene family contraction drive the evolution of lifestyle and host shifts of hypocrealean fungi. Mycology 2018; 9:176–188 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  30. De Bie T, Cristianini N, Demuth JP, Hahn MW. CAFE: a computational tool for the study of gene family evolution. Bioinformatics 2006; 22:1269–1271 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Lechner M, Findeiss S, Steiner L, Marz M, Stadler PF et al. Proteinortho: detection of (co-)orthologs in large-scale analysis. BMC Bioinformatics 2011; 12:124 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Suyama M, Torrents D, Bork P. PAL2NAL: robust conversion of protein sequence alignments into the corresponding codon alignments. Nucleic Acids Res 2006; 34:W609–12 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Yang Z. PAML 4: Phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Mol Biol Evol 2007; 24:1586–1591 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Yang Z, Nielsen R, Goldman N, Pedersen AM. Codon-substitution models for heterogeneous selection pressure at amino acid sites. Genetics 2000; 155:431–449 [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Janiak MC, Chaney ME, Tosi AJ. Evolution of acidic mammalian chitinase genes (CHIA) is related to body mass and insectivory in primates. Mol Biol Evoltion 2018; 35:607–622
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Yang Z, Nielsen R. Codon-substitution models for detecting molecular adaptation at individual sites along specific lineages. Mol Biol Evol 2002; 19:908–917 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Tomasco IH, Boullosa N, Hoffmann FG, Lessa EP. Molecular adaptive convergence in the α-globin gene in subterranean octodontid rodents. Gene 2017; 628:275–280 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Weaver S, Shank SD, Spielman SJ, Li M, Muse SV et al. Datamonkey 2.0: a modern web application for characterizing selective and other evolutionary processes. Mol Biol Evol 2018; 35:773–777 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Kosakovsky Pond SL, Frost SDW. Not so different after all: a comparison of methods for detecting amino acid sites under selection. Mol Biol Evol 2005; 22:1208–1222 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Murrell B, Wertheim JO, Moola S, Weighill T, Scheffler K et al. Detecting individual sites subject to episodic diversifying selection. PLoS Genet 2012; 8:e1002764 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Murrell B, Moola S, Mabona A, Weighill T, Sheward D et al. FUBAR: a fast, unconstrained bayesian approximation for inferring selection. Mol Biol Evol 2013; 30:1196–1205 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Smith MD, Wertheim JO, Weaver S, Murrell B, Scheffler K et al. Less is more: an adaptive branch-site random effects model for efficient detection of episodic diversifying selection. Mol Biol Evol 2015; 32:1342–1353 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Habermann BH. Where Art Thou? Finding orthologs in the twilight and midnight zones of sequence similarity. Pontarotti P. eds In Evolutionary Biology: Convergent Evolution, Evolution of Complex Traits, Concepts and Methods Springer; 2016 pp 393–419
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Rech GE, Vargas WA, Sukno SA, Thon MR. Identification of positive selection in disease response genes within members of the Poaceae. Plant Signal Behav 2012; 7:1667–1675 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Mira F, Canuti M, Purpari G, Cannella V, Di Bella S et al. Molecular characterization and evolutionary analyses of carnivore Protoparvovirus 1 ns1 gene. Viruses 2019; 11:308 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Carsolio C, Gutiérrez A, Jiménez B, Van Montagu M, Herrera-Estrella A. Characterization of ECH-42, a Trichoderma harzianum endochitinase gene expressed during mycoparasitism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1994; 91:10903–10907 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Shah JM, Raghupathy V, Veluthambi K. Enhanced sheath blight resistance in transgenic rice expressing an endochitinase gene from Trichoderma virens. Biotechnol Lett 2009; 31:239–244 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Gruber S, Seidl-Seiboth V. Self versus non-self: fungal cell wall degradation in Trichoderma. Microbiology 2012; 158:26–34
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Garth JM, Mackel JJ, Reeder KM, Blackburn JP, Dunaway CW et al. Acidic mammalian chitinase negatively affects immune responses during acute and chronic Aspergillus fumigatus exposure. Infect Immun 2018; 86:e00944-17 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Patel S, Goyal A. Chitin and chitinase: role in pathogenicity, allergenicity and health. Int J Biol Macromol 2017; 97:331–338 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Kzhyshkowska J, Yin S, Liu T, Riabov V, Mitrofanova I. Role of chitinase-like proteins in cancer. Biol Chem 2016; 397:231–247 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Mack I, Hector A, Ballbach M, Kohlhäufl J, Fuchs KJ et al. The role of chitin, chitinases, and chitinase-like proteins in pediatric lung diseases. Mol Cell Pediatr 2015; 2:3 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Bernardi B, Kayacan Y, Wendland J. Expansion of a telomeric FLO/ALS-like sequence gene family in Saccharomycopsis fermentans. Front Genet 2018; 9:536 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Lachance MA, Pupovac-Velikonja A, Natarajan S, Schlag-Edler B. Nutrition and phylogeny of predacious yeasts. Can J Microbiol 2000; 46:495–505 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Kurtzman CP. Trichomonascus petasosporus sp. nov. and Sympodiomyces indianaensis sp. nov., two new members of the Saccharomycetales. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2004; 85:297–304 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Humber RA. Evolution of entomopathogenicity in fungi. J Invertebr Pathol 2008; 98:262–266 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Stark MJ, Boyd A. The killer toxin of kluyveromyces lactis: characterization of the toxin subunits and identification of the genes which encode them. EMBO J 1986; 5:1995–2002 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Strak MJR, Boyd A, Mileham AJ, Ramonos MA. The plasmid-encoded killer system ofKluyveromyces lactis: a review. Yeast 1990; 6:1–29 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Tzelepis G, Karlsson M. Killer toxin-like chitinases in filamentous fungi: Structure, regulation and potential roles in fungal biology. Fungal Biology Reviews 2018; 33:123–132
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Karlsson M, Atanasova L, Jensen DF, Zeilinger S et al. Necrotrophic mycoparasites and their genomes. Spectrum 2016; 5:
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Harman GE, Howell CR, Viterbo A, Chet I, Lorito M. Trichoderma species--opportunistic, avirulent plant symbionts. Nat Rev Microbiol 2004; 2:43–56 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Reynolds HT, Currie CR. Pathogenicity of Escovopsis weberi: the parasite of the attine ant-microbe symbiosis directly consumes the ant-cultivated fungus. Mycologia 2004; 96:955–959 [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Nielsen LK, Jensen JD, Nielsen GC, Jensen JE, Spliid NH et al. Fusarium head blight of cereals in Denmark: species complex and related mycotoxins. Phytopathology 2011; 101:960–969 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Carrieri R, Raimo F, Pentangelo A, Lahoz E. Fusarium proliferatum and Fusarium tricinctum as causal agents of pink rot of onion bulbs and the effect of soil solarization combined with compost amendment in controlling their infections in field. Crop Protection 2013; 43:31–37 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Chitrampalam P, Nelson BD Jr. Effect of Fusarium tricinctum on growth of soybean and a molecular-based method of identification. Plant Health Progress 2014; 15:124–129 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Bowen JK, Templeton MD, Sharrock KR, Crowhurst RN, Rikkerink EH. Gene inactivation in the plant pathogen Glomerella cingulata: three strategies for the disruption of the pectin lyase gene pnlA. Mol Gen Genet 1995; 246:196–205 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Wang CX, Zhang ZF, Li BH, Wang HY, Dong XL. First report of Glomerella leaf spot of apple caused by Glomerella cingulata in China. Plant Dis 2012; 96:912 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Zhai LF, Liu J, Zhang MX, Hong N, Wang GP et al. The first report of leaf spots in Aloe vera caused by Nigrospora oryzae in China. Plant Dis 2013; 97:1256 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Zheng L, Shi F, Kelly D, Hsiang T. First report of leaf spot of Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis) caused by Nigrospora oryzae in Ontario. Plant Dis 2012; 96:909 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Goughenour KD, Whalin J, Slot JC, Rappleye CA. Diversification of fungal chitinases and their functional differentiation in histoplasma capsulatum. Mol Biol Evol 2021; 38:1339–1355 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Zhang J. Evolution by gene duplication: an update. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 2003; 18:292–298 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Innan H, Kondrashov F. The evolution of gene duplications: classifying and distinguishing between models. Nat Rev Genet 2010; 11:97–108 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/mgen/10.1099/mgen.0.000646
Loading
Comparative molecular evolution of chitinases in ascomycota with emphasis on mycoparasitism lifestyle
M Gen 7, 000646 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1099/mgen.0.000646
/content/journal/mgen/10.1099/mgen.0.000646
/content/journal/mgen/10.1099/mgen.0.000646
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF

Most cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error