1887

Abstract

serovar Typhimurium is the leading cause of salmonellosis in Australia, and the ability to identify outbreaks and their sources is vital to public health. Here, we examined the utility of whole-genome sequencing (WGS), including complete genome sequencing with Oxford Nanopore technologies, in examining 105 isolates from an endemic multi-locus variable number tandem repeat analysis (MLVA) type over 5 years. The MLVA type was very homogeneous, with 90 % of the isolates falling into groups with a five SNP cut-off. We developed a new two-step approach for outbreak detection using WGS. The first clustering at a zero single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) cut-off was used to detect outbreak clusters that each occurred within a 4 week window and then a second clustering with dynamically increased SNP cut-offs were used to generate outbreak investigation clusters capable of identifying all outbreak cases. This approach offered optimal specificity and sensitivity for outbreak detection and investigation, in particular of those caused by endemic MLVA types or clones with low genetic diversity. We further showed that inclusion of complete genome sequences detected no additional mutational events for genomic outbreak surveillance. Phylogenetic analysis found that the MLVA type was likely to have been derived recently from a single source that persisted over 5 years, and seeded numerous sporadic infections and outbreaks. Our findings suggest that SNP cut-offs for outbreak cluster detection and public-health surveillance should be based on the local diversity of the relevant strains over time. These findings have general applicability to outbreak detection of bacterial pathogens.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/mgen/10.1099/mgen.0.000310
2019-11-04
2019-11-12
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/mgen/10.1099/mgen.0.000310/mgen000310.html?itemId=/content/journal/mgen/10.1099/mgen.0.000310&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Phillips A, Sotomayor C, Wang Q, Holmes N, Furlong C et al. Whole genome sequencing of Salmonella Typhimurium illuminates distinct outbreaks caused by an endemic multi-locus variable number tandem repeat analysis type in Australia, 2014. BMC Microbiol 2016;16: 211 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Ford L, Carter GP, Wang Q, Seemann T, Sintchenko V et al. Incorporating whole-genome sequencing into public health surveillance: lessons from prospective sequencing of Salmonella Typhimurium in Australia. Foodborne Pathog Dis 2018;15: 161– 167 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Mook P, Gardiner D, Verlander NQ, McCormick J, Usdin M et al. Operational burden of implementing Salmonella Enteritidis and Typhimurium cluster detection using whole genome sequencing surveillance data in England: a retrospective assessment. Epidemiol Infect 2018;146: 1452– 1460 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Anonymous Whole genome sequencing for foodborne disease surveillance: landscape paper Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018
  5. Octavia S, Wang Q, Tanaka MM, Kaur S, Sintchenko V et al. Delineating community outbreaks of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium by use of whole-genome sequencing: insights into genomic variability within an outbreak. J Clin Microbiol 2015;53: 1063– 1071 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Mair-Jenkins J, Borges-Stewart R, Harbour C, Cox-Rogers J, Dallman T et al. Investigation using whole genome sequencing of a prolonged restaurant outbreak of Salmonella Typhimurium linked to the building drainage system, England, February 2015 to March 2016. Euro Surveill 2017;22: [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Gymoese P, Sørensen G, Litrup E, Olsen JE, Nielsen EM et al. Investigation of outbreaks of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium and its monophasic variants using whole-genome sequencing, Denmark. Emerg Infect Dis 2017;23: 1631– 1639 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bloomfield SJ, Benschop J, Biggs PJ, Marshall JC, Hayman DTS et al. Genomic analysis of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium DT160 associated with a 14-year outbreak, New Zealand, 1998-2012. Emerg Infect Dis 2017;23: 906– 913 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Mather AE, Reid SWJ, Maskell DJ, Parkhill J, Fookes MC et al. Distinguishable epidemics of multidrug-resistant Salmonella Typhimurium DT104 in different hosts. Science 2013;341: 1514– 1517 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Zhang S, Li S, Gu W, den Bakker H, Boxrud D et al. Zoonotic source attribution of Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium using genomic surveillance data, United States. Emerg Infect Dis 2019;25: 82– 91 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Ford L, Wang Q, Stafford R, Ressler K-A, Norton S et al. Seven Salmonella Typhimurium outbreaks in Australia linked by trace-back and whole genome sequencing. Foodborne Pathog Dis 2018;15: 285– 292 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Wick RR, Judd LM, Gorrie CL, Holt KE. Completing bacterial genome assemblies with multiplex MinION sequencing. Microb Genom 2017;3: e000132 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. De Coster W, D'Hert S, Schultz DT, Cruts M, Van Broeckhoven C. NanoPack: visualizing and processing long-read sequencing data. Bioinformatics 2018;34: 2666– 2669 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Wick RR, Judd LM, Gorrie CL, Holt KE. Unicycler: resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads. PLoS Comput Biol 2017;13: e1005595 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Koren S, Walenz BP, Berlin K, Miller JR, Bergman NH et al. Canu: scalable and accurate long-read assembly via adaptive k-mer weighting and repeat separation. Genome Res 2017;27: 722– 736 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Seemann T. 2015; snippy: fast bacterial variant calling from NGS reads, v3.1. GitHub https://github.com/tseemann/snippy
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Cingolani P, Platts A, Wang LL, Coon M, Nguyen T et al. A program for annotating and predicting the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms, SnpEff: SNPs in the genome of Drosophila melanogaster strain w(1118); iso-2; iso-3. Fly 2012;6: 80– 92 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Choi Y, Chan AP. PROVEAN web server: a tool to predict the functional effect of amino acid substitutions and indels. Bioinformatics 2015;31: 2745– 2747 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Arndt D, Grant JR, Marcu A, Sajed T, Pon A et al. PHASTER: a better, faster version of the PHAST phage search tool. Nucleic Acids Res 2016;44: W16– W21 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol 2016;33: 1870– 1874 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Letunic I, Bork P. Interactive tree of life (iTOL) V3: an online tool for the display and annotation of phylogenetic and other trees. Nucleic Acids Res 2016;44: W242– W245 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Darling AE, Mau B, Perna NT. progressiveMauve: multiple genome alignment with gene gain, loss and rearrangement. PLoS One 2010;5: e11147 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Thorvaldsdóttir H, Robinson JT, Mesirov JP. Integrative genomics Viewer (IGV): high-performance genomics data visualization and exploration. Brief Bioinform 2013;14: 178– 192 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Sintchenko V, Wang Q, Howard P, Ha CW, Kardamanidis K et al. Improving resolution of public health surveillance for human Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium infection: 3 years of prospective multiple-locus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis (MLVA). BMC Infect Dis 2012;12: 78 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Dubarry N, Possoz C, Barre F-X. Multiple regions along the Escherichia coli FtsK protein are implicated in cell division. Mol Microbiol 2010;78: 1088– 1100 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Kang MS, Kwon YK, Oh JY, Call DR, An BK et al. Multilocus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis for subtyping Salmonella enterica serovar Gallinarum. Avian Pathol 2011;40: 559– 564 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Vignaud M-L, Cherchame E, Marault M, Chaing E, Le Hello S et al. MLVA for Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Dublin: development of a method suitable for inter-laboratory surveillance and application in the context of a raw milk cheese outbreak in France in 2012. Front Microbiol 2017;8: 295 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Guiney DG, Fierer J. The role of the spv genes in Salmonella pathogenesis. Front Microbiol 2011;2: 129 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Ahmer BM, Tran M, Heffron F. The virulence plasmid of Salmonella Typhimurium is self-transmissible. J Bacteriol 1999;181: 1364– 1368
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Fu S, Hiley L, Octavia S, Tanaka MM, Sintchenko V et al. Comparative genomics of Australian and international isolates of Salmonella Typhimurium: correlation of core genome evolution with CRISPR and prophage profiles. Sci Rep 2017;7: 9733 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Bekal S, Berry C, Reimer AR, Van Domselaar G, Beaudry G et al. Usefulness of high-quality core genome single-nucleotide variant analysis for subtyping the highly clonal and the most prevalent Salmonella enterica serovar Heidelberg clone in the context of outbreak investigations. J Clin Microbiol 2016;54: 289– 295 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Leekitcharoenphon P, Nielsen EM, Kaas RS, Lund O, Aarestrup FM. Evaluation of whole genome sequencing for outbreak detection of Salmonella enterica. PLoS One 2014;9: e87991 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Sintchenko V, Wang Q, Howard P, Ha CW, Kardamanidis K et al. Improving resolution of public health surveillance for human Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium infection: 3 years of prospective multiple-locus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis (MLVA). BMC Infect Dis 2012;12: 78 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Tyler AD, Mataseje L, Urfano CJ, Schmidt L, Antonation KS et al. Evaluation of Oxford Nanopore's MinION sequencing device for microbial whole genome sequencing applications. Sci Rep 2018;8: 10931 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/mgen/10.1099/mgen.0.000310
Loading
/content/journal/mgen/10.1099/mgen.0.000310
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 2

EXCEL

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error