Whole-genome sequencing of dog-specific assemblages C and D of from single and pooled cysts indicates host-associated genes Open Access

Abstract

(syn. or ) infSAects over 280 million people each year and numerous animals. can be subdivided into eight assemblages with different host specificity. Unculturable assemblages have so far resisted genome sequencing efforts. In this study, we isolated single and pooled cysts of assemblages C and D from dog faeces by FACS, and sequenced them using multiple displacement amplification and Illumina paired-end sequencing. The genomes of assemblages C and D were compared with genomes of assemblages A and B from humans and assemblage E from ruminants and pigs. The genomes obtained from the pooled cysts and from the single cysts were considered complete (>99 % marker genes observed) and the allelic sequence heterozygosity (ASH) values of assemblages C and D were 0.89 and 0.74 %, respectively. These ASH values were slightly higher than for assemblage B (>0.43 %) and much higher than for assemblages A and E, which ranged from 0.002 to 0.037 %. The flavohaemoglobin and 4Fe-4S binding domain family encoding genes involved in O and NO detoxification were only present in assemblages A, B and E. Cathepsin B orthologs were found in all genomes. Six clades of cathepsin B orthologs contained one gene of each genome, while in three clades not all assemblages were represented. We conclude that whole-genome sequencing from a single cyst results in complete draft genomes, making the genomes of unculturable assemblages accessible. Observed differences between the genomes of assemblages C and D on one hand and the assemblages A, B and E on the other hand are possibly associated with host specificity.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/mgen/10.1099/mgen.0.000302
2019-12-01
2024-03-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/mgen/5/12/mgen000302.html?itemId=/content/journal/mgen/10.1099/mgen.0.000302&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Lane S, Lloyd D. Current trends in research into the waterborne parasite Giardia. Crit Rev Microbiol 2002; 28:123–147 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Sprong H, Cacciò SM, van der Giessen JWB. ZOOPNET Network and Partners Identification of zoonotic genotypes of Giardia duodenalis . PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2009; 3:e558
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Feng Y, Xiao L. Zoonotic potential and molecular epidemiology of Giardia species and giardiasis. Clin Microbiol Rev 2011; 24:110–140 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Franzén O, Jerlström-Hultqvist J, Castro E, Sherwood E, Ankarklev J et al. Draft genome sequencing of Giardia intestinalis assemblage B isolate GS: is human giardiasis caused by two different species?. PLoS Pathog 2009; 5:e1000560 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Jerlström-Hultqvist J, Ankarklev J, Svärd SG. Is human giardiasis caused by two different Giardia species?. Gut Microbes 2010; 1:379–382 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Monis PT, Andrews RH, Mayrhofer G, Ey PL. Genetic diversity within the morphological species Giardia intestinalis and its relationship to host origin. Infect Genet Evol 2003; 3:29–38 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Morrison HG, McArthur AG, Gillin FD, Aley SB, Adam RD et al. Genomic minimalism in the early diverging intestinal parasite Giardia lamblia . Science 2007; 317:1921–1926 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Poxleitner MK, Carpenter ML, Mancuso JJ, Wang C-JR, Dawson SC et al. Evidence for karyogamy and exchange of genetic material in the binucleate intestinal parasite Giardia intestinalis . Science 2008; 319:1530–1533 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Adam RD, Dahlstrom EW, Martens CA, Bruno DP, Barbian KD et al. Genome sequencing of Giardia lamblia genotypes A2 and B isolates (DH and Gs) and comparative analysis with the genomes of genotypes A1 and E (WB and pig). Genome Biol Evol 2013; 5:2498–2511 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Jerlström-Hultqvist J, Franzén O, Ankarklev J, Xu F, Nohýnková E et al. Genome analysis and comparative genomics of a Giardia intestinalis assemblage E isolate. BMC Genomics 2010; 11:e543 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Dubourg A, Xia D, Winpenny JP, Al Naimi S, Bouzid M et al. Giardia secretome highlights secreted tenascins as a key component of pathogenesis. Gigascience 2018; 7:giy003 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Bhargava A, Cotton JA, Dixon BR, Gedamu L, Yates RM et al. Giardia duodenalis surface cysteine proteases induce cleavage of the intestinal epithelial cytoskeletal protein villin via myosin light chain kinase. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0136102 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Liu J, Ma'ayeh S, Peirasmaki D, Lundström-Stadelmann B, Hellman L et al. Secreted Giardia intestinalis cysteine proteases disrupt intestinal epithelial cell junctional complexes and degrade chemokines. Virulence 2018; 9:879–894 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Hanevik K, Bakken R, Brattbakk HR, Saghaug CS, Langeland N. Whole genome sequencing of clinical isolates of Giardia lamblia . Clin Microbiol Infect 2015; 21:192.e1–192.e3 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Troell K, Hallström B, Divne A-M, Alsmark C, Arrighi R et al. Cryptosporidium as a testbed for single cell genome characterization of unicellular eukaryotes. BMC Genomics 2016; 17:471 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Uiterwijk M, Nijsse R, Kooyman FNJ, Wagenaar JA, Mughini-Gras L et al. Comparing four diagnostic tests for Giardia duodenalis in dogs using latent class analysis. Parasit Vectors 2018; 11:439 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Cacciò SM, Beck R, Lalle M, Marinculic A, Pozio E. Multilocus genotyping of Giardia duodenalis reveals striking differences between assemblages A and B. Int J Parasitol 2008; 38:1523–1531 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Tseng YC, Ho GD, Chen T TW, Huang BF, Cheng PC et al. Prevalence and genotype of Giardia duodenalis from faecal samples of stray dogs in Hualien city of eastern Taiwan. Trop Biomed 2014; 31:305–311
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Ellegaard KM, Klasson L, Andersson SGE. Testing the reproducibility of multiple displacement amplification on genomes of clonal endosymbiont populations. PLoS One 2013; 8:e82319 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Lasken RS. Single-cell genomic sequencing using multiple displacement amplification. Curr Opin Microbiol 2007; 10:510–516 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Buchfink B, Xie C, Huson DH. Fast and sensitive protein alignment using diamond. Nat Methods 2015; 12:59–60 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Huson DH, Beier S, Flade I, Górska A, El-Hadidi M et al. MEGAN community edition - interactive exploration and analysis of large-scale microbiome sequencing data. PLoS Comput Biol 2016; 12:e1004957 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M et al. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 2012; 19:455–477 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Ekseth OK, Kuiper M, Mironov V. orthAgogue: an agile tool for the rapid prediction of orthology relations. Bioinformatics 2014; 30:734–736 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Enright AJ, Van Dongen S, Ouzounis CA. An efficient algorithm for large-scale detection of protein families. Nucleic Acids Res 2002; 30:1575–1584 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Edgar RC. Muscle: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res 2004; 32:1792–1797 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Nguyen L-T, Schmidt HA, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ. IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol 2015; 32:268–274 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Hoang DT, Chernomor O, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ, Vinh LS. UFBoot2: improving the ultrafast bootstrap approximation. Mol Biol Evol 2018; 35:518–522 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol 2013; 30:2725–2729 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Jain C, Rodriguez-R LM, Phillippy AM, Konstantinidis KT, Aluru S. High throughput ani analysis of 90K prokaryotic genomes reveals clear species boundaries. Nat Commun 2018; 9:
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Sajid M, McKerrow JH. Cysteine proteases of parasitic organisms. Mol Biochem Parasitol 2002; 120:1–21 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Ankarklev J, Lebbad M, Einarsson E, Franzén O, Ahola H et al. A novel high-resolution multilocus sequence typing of Giardia intestinalis assemblage A isolates reveals zoonotic transmission, clonal outbreaks and recombination. Infect Genet Evol 2018; 60:7–16 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Ansell BRE, Baker L, Emery SJ, McConville MJ, Svärd SG et al. Transcriptomics indicates active and passive metronidazole resistance mechanisms in three seminal Giardia lines. Front Microbiol 2017; 8:e00398 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Ma'ayeh SY, Knörr L, Svärd SG. Transcriptional profiling of Giardia intestinalis in response to oxidative stress. Int J Parasitol 2015; 45:925–938 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Mastronicola D, Testa F, Forte E, Bordi E, Pucillo LP et al. Flavohemoglobin and nitric oxide detoxification in the human protozoan parasite Giardia intestinalis . Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2010; 399:654–658 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Bernander R, Palm JED, Svärd SG. Genome ploidy in different stages of the Giardia lamblia life cycle. Cell Microbiol 2001; 3:55–62 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Monis PT, Andrews RH, Mayrhofer G, Ey PL. Molecular systematics of the parasitic protozoan Giardia intestinalis . Mol Biol Evol 1999; 16:1135–1144 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Monis P, Thompson RCA. Giardia – from genome to proteome. In Rollinson D, Hay SI. (editors) Advances in Parasitology 78 London and Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2012 pp 57–95
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Ryan U, Cacciò SM. Zoonotic potential of Giardia . Int J Parasitol 2013; 43:943–956 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Pallant L, Barutzki D, Schaper R, Thompson RCA. The epidemiology of infections with Giardia species and genotypes in well cared for dogs and cats in Germany. Parasit Vectors 2015; 8:2 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Cotton JA, Bhargava A, Ferraz JG, Yates RM, Beck PL et al. Giardia duodenalis cathepsin B proteases degrade intestinal epithelial interleukin-8 and attenuate interleukin-8-induced neutrophil chemotaxis. Infect Immun 2014; 82:2772–2787 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Emery SJ, Mirzaei M, Vuong D, Pascovici D, Chick JM et al. Induction of virulence factors in Giardia duodenalis independent of host attachment. Sci Rep 2016; 6:20765 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Xu F, Jerlström-Hultqvist J, Einarsson E, Ástvaldsson A, Svärd SG et al. The genome of Spironucleus salmonicida highlights a fish pathogen adapted to fluctuating environments. PLoS Genet 2014; 10:e1004053 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/mgen/10.1099/mgen.0.000302
Loading
/content/journal/mgen/10.1099/mgen.0.000302
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF

Supplementary material 2

EXCEL

Most cited Most Cited RSS feed