1887

Abstract

Introduction:

is a Gram‐positive facultative anaerobic coccoid rod bacterium that grows slowly in culture. This bacterium was classified as a new genus in 1997 but is often overlooked or considered a contaminant because of both its resemblance to the normal bacterial flora on skin and mucosa and the overgrowth of other bacteria. During the past decade, has emerged as a more common urinary tract pathogen than previously thought.

Case presentation:

Here, we describe the case of a patient with an untreated urinary tract infection that turned into urosepsis.

Conclusion:

This case shows that the invasive potential of this bacterium should not always be ruled out.

  • This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jmmcr/10.1099/jmmcr.0.000030
2015-04-01
2024-04-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jmmcr/2/2/jmmcr000030.html?itemId=/content/journal/jmmcr/10.1099/jmmcr.0.000030&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Andersen P.K., Søby K.M., Bank S., Prag J. ( 2011). In vitro susceptibility of Actinobaculum schaalii to mecillinam. J Antimicrob Chemother 66:2181–2182 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Andersen L.B., Bank S., Hertz B., Søby K.M., Prag J. ( 2012). Actinobaculum schaalii, a cause of urinary tract infections in children?. Acta Paediatr 101:e232–e234 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bank S., Jensen A., Hansen T.M., Søby K.M., Prag J. ( 2010). Actinobaculum schaalii, a common uropathogen in elderly patients, Denmark. Emerg Infect Dis 16:76–80 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bank S., Hansen T.M., Søby K.M., Lund L., Prag J. ( 2011). Actinobaculum schaalii in urological patients, screened with real‐time polymerase chain reaction. Scand J Urol Nephrol 45:406–410 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Barberis C., Cittadini R., del Castillo M., Acevedo P., García Roig C., Ramírez M.S., Pérez S., Almuzara M., Vay C. ( 2014). Actinobaculum schaalii causing urinary tract infections: report of four cases from Argentina. J Infect Dev Ctries 13:240–244
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Beguelin C., Genne D., Varca A., Tritten M.L., Siegrist H.H., Jaton K., Lienhard R. ( 2011). Actinobaculum schaalii: clinical observation of 20 cases. Clin Microbiol Infect 17:1027–1031 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Cattoir V., Varca A., Greub G., Prod'hom G., Legrand P., Lienhard R. ( 2010). In vitro susceptibility of Actinobaculum schaalii to 12 antimicrobial agents and molecular analysis of fluoroquinolone resistance. J Antimicrob Chemother 65:2514–2517 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Cattoir V. ( 2012). Actinobaculum schaalii: review of an emerging uropathogen. J Infect 64:260–267 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Gomez E., Gustafson D.R., Rosenblatt J.E., Patel R. ( 2011). Actinobaculum bacteremia: a report of 12 cases. J Clin Microbiol 49:4311–4313 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Larios O.E., Bernard K.A., Manickam K., Ng B., Alfa M., Ronald A. ( 2010). First report of Actinobaculum schaalii urinary tract infection in North America. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 67:282–285 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Lawson P.A., Falsen E., Akervall E., Vandamme P., Collins M.D. ( 1997). Characterization of some Actinomyces‐like isolates from human clinical specimens: reclassification of Actinomyces suis (Soltys and Spratling) as Actinobaculum suis comb. nov. and description of Actinobaculum schaalii sp. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol 47:899–903 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. McKew G., Watson B., Chan R., van Hal S.J. ( 2013). “Probable contaminants” no more: rapid identification of Gram‐positive rods leads to improved clinical care. J Clin Microbiol 51:1641 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Nielsen H.L., Søby K.M., Christensen J.J., Prag J. ( 2010). Actinobaculum schaalii: a common cause of urinary tract infection in the elderly population. Bacteriological and clinical characteristics. Scand J Infect Dis 42:43–47 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Olsen A.B., Andersen P.K., Bank S., Søby K.M., Lund L., Prag J. ( 2013). Actinobaculum schaalii, a commensal of the urogenital area. Br J Urol Int 112:394–397 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Reinhard M., Prag J., Kemp M., Andresen K., Klemmensen B., Højlyng N., Sørensen S.H., Christensen J.J. ( 2005). Ten cases of Actinobaculum schaalii infection: clinical relevance, bacterial identification, and antibiotic susceptibility. J Clin Microbiol 43:5305–5308 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Sandlund J., Glimåker M., Svahn A., Brauner A. ( 2014). Bacteraemia caused by Actinobaculum schaalii: an overlooked pathogen?. Scand J Infect Dis 46:605–608 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Sturm P.D.J., Van Eijk J., Veltman S., Meuleman E., Schülin T. ( 2006). Urosepsis with Actinobaculum schaalii and Aerococcus urinae . J Clin Microbiol 44:652–654 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Tavassoli P., Paterson R., Grant J. ( 2012). Actinobaculum schaalii: an emerging uropathogen?. Case Rep Urol468516–468517
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Tschudin‐Sutter S., Frei R., Weisser M., Goldenberger D., Widmer A.F. ( 2011). Actinobaculum schaalii – invasive pathogen or innocent bystander? A retrospective observational study. BMC Infect Dis 11:289–293 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Vasquez M.A., Marne C., López‐Calleja A.I., Martín‐Saco G., Revillo M.J. ( 2013). Actinobaculum schaalii recurrent urinary infection in a centenarian patient. Geriatr Gerontol Int 13:807–808 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Zimmermann P., Berlinger L., Liniger B., Grunt S., Agyeman P., Ritz N. ( 2012). Actinobaculum schaalii an emerging pediatric pathogen?. BMC Infect Dis 12:201–205 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/jmmcr/10.1099/jmmcr.0.000030
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error