1887

Abstract

Introduction:

Brucellosis is a zoonotic disease that has a significant economic, social and public health impact in many parts of the world. The causative agents are members of the genus currently comprising 11 species and with an expanding known host range in recent years.

Case presentation:

One of a pair of White’s tree frogs () developed skin lesions from which a pure growth of a haemolytic organism was obtained. The isolate was identified as by matrix‐assisted laser desorption/ionization time‐of‐flight mass spectrometry, although the colony morphology was inconsistent with this identification. Applying the classical biotyping approach used to subdivide members of the genus , the isolate did not correspond to any known sp. However, PCR targeting of genes specific for members of the genus was strongly positive and 16S rRNA gene sequencing revealed a close relationship with extant spp. In order to place the isolate more accurately, a multilocus sequencing approach was applied, which confirmed that the isolate represented a novel member of the emerging ‘atypical’ group, which includes isolates from human disease, from rodents and, more recently, reported isolations from frogs in Germany.

Conclusion:

This case represents the first report of isolation of a sp. from frogs outside Germany and suggests that these isolates may be widespread. Whilst there is no evidence to date that these isolates represent a zoonotic threat, the association of other ‘atypical’ sp. with human disease suggests that appropriate measures should be taken to avoid unnecessary contact with potentially infected amphibians until the zoonotic potential of this group is better understood.

Keyword(s): Brucella , brucellosis , frog and MALDI‐ToF
  • This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jmmcr/10.1099/jmmcr.0.000017
2015-02-01
2024-03-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jmmcr/2/1/jmmcr000017.html?itemId=/content/journal/jmmcr/10.1099/jmmcr.0.000017&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Cunningham S.A., Patel R. ( 2013). Importance of using Bruker’s security‐relevant library for biotyper identification of Burkholderia pseudomallei, Brucella species and Francisella tularensis . J Clin Microbiol 51:1639–1640 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. De B.K., Stauffer L., Koylass M.S., Sharp S.E., Gee J.E., Helsel L.O., Steigerwalt A.G., Vega R., Clark T.A. other authors.( 2008). Novel Brucella strain (BO1) associated with a prosthetic breast implant infection. J Clin Microbiol 46:43–49 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Eisenberg T., Hamann H.P., Kaim U., Schlez K., Seeger H., Schauerte N., Melzer F., Tomaso H., Scholz H.C. other authors.( 2012). Isolation of potentially novel Brucella spp. from frogs. Appl Environ Microbiol 78:3753–3755 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Fischer D., Lorenz N., Heuser W., Kämpfer P., Scholz H.C., Lierz M. ( 2012). Abscesses associated with a Brucella inopinata‐like bacterium in a big‐eyed tree frog (Leptopelis vermiculatus). J Zoo Wildl Med 43:625–628 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Gee J.E., De B.K., Levett P.N., Whitney A.M., Novak R.T., Popovic T. ( 2004). Use of 16S rRNA gene sequencing for rapid confirmatory identification of Brucella isolates. J Clin Microbiol 42:3649–3654 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Godfroid J., Scholz H.C., Barbier T., Nicolas C., Wattiau P., Fretin D., Whatmore A.M., Cloeckaert A., Blasco J.M. other authors.( 2011). Brucellosis at the animal/ecosystem/human interface at the beginning of the 21st century. Prev Vet Med 102:118–131 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Jiménez de Bagüés M.P., Iturralde M., Arias M.A., Pardo J., Clooeckaert A., Zygmunt M.S. ( 2014). The new strains Brucella inopinata BO1 and Brucella species 83‐210 behave biologically like classic infectious Brucella species and cause death in murine models of infection. J Infect Dis 210:467–472 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Lapaque N., Moriyon I., Moreno E., Gorvel J.P. ( 2005). Brucella lipopolysaccharide acts as a virulence factor. Curr Opin Microbiol 8:60–66 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. López‐Goñi I., García‐Yoldi D., Marín C.M., de Miguel M.J., Barquero‐Calvo E., Guzmán‐Verri C., Albert D., Garin‐Bastuji B. ( 2011). New Bruce‐ladder multiplex PCR assay for the biovar typing of Brucella suis and the discrimination of Brucella suis and Brucella canis . Vet Microbiol 154:152–155 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Matero P., Hemmilä H., Tomaso H., Piiparinen H., Rantakokko‐Jalava K., Nuotio L., Nikkari S. ( 2011). Rapid field detection assays for Bacillus anthracis, Brucella spp., Francisella tularensis and Yersinia pestis . Clin Microbiol Infect 17:34–43 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Probert W.S., Schrader K.N., Khuong N.Y., Bystrom S.L., Graves M.H. ( 2004). Real‐time multiplex PCR assay for detection of Brucella spp., B. . abortus, and B. melitensis. J Clin Microbiol 42:1290–1293 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Scholz H.C., Nöckler K., Göllner C., Bahn P., Vergnaud G., Tomaso H., Al Dahouk S., Kämpfer P., Cloeckaert A. other authors ( 2010). Brucella inopinata sp. nov., isolated from a breast implant infection. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 60:801–808 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Tiller R.V., Gee J.E., Frace M.A., Taylor T.K., Setubal J.C., Hoffmaster A.R., De B.K. ( 2010a). Characterization of novel Brucella strains originating from wild native rodent species in North Queensland, Australia. Appl Environ Microbiol 76:5837–5845 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Tiller R.V., Gee J.E., Lonsway D.R., Gribble S., Bell S.C., Jennison A.V., Bates J., Coulter C., Hoffmaster A.R., De B.K. ( 2010b). Identification of an unusual Brucella strain (BO2) from a lung biopsy in a 52 year‐old patient with chronic destructive pneumonia. BMC Microbiol 10:23 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Wattam A.R., Inzana T.J., Williams K.P., Mane S.P., Shukla M., Almeida N.F., Dickerman A.W., Mason S., Moriyón I. other authors.( 2012). Comparative genomics of early‐diverging Brucella strains reveals a novel lipopolysaccharide biosynthesis pathway. MBio 3:e00246–12 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Wattam A.R., Foster J.T., Mane S.P., Beckstrom‐Sternberg S.M., Beckstrom‐Sternberg J.M., Dickerman A.W., Keim P., Pearson T., Shukla M. other authors( 2014). Comparative phylogenomics and evolution of the Brucellae: a path to virulence. J Bacteriol 196:920–930 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Whatmore A.M. ( 2009). Current understanding of the genetic diversity of Brucella, an expanding genus of zoonotic pathogens. Infect Genet Evol 9:1168–1184 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Whatmore A.M., Gopaul K.K. ( 2012). Recent advances in molecular approaches to Brucella diagnostics and epidemiology. In Brucella: Molecular Microbiology and Genomics pp. 57–88 Edited by I. Lopez‐Goni & D. O’Callaghan, D. (eds) Norwich, UK: Caister Academic Press;
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Whatmore A.M., Perrett L.L., MacMillan A.P. ( 2007). Characterisation of the genetic diversity of Brucella by multilocus sequencing. BMC Microbiol 7:34 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Whatmore A.M., Davison N., Cloeckaert A., Al Dahouk S., Zygmunt M.S., Brew S.D., Perrett L.L., Koylass M.S., Vergnaud G. other authors.( 2014). Brucella papionis sp. nov. isolated from baboons (Papio spp.). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 64:4120–4128 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Zygmunt M.S., Jacques I., Bernardet N., Cloeckaert A. ( 2012). Lipopolysaccharide heterogeneity in the atypical group of novel emerging Brucella species. Clin Vaccine Immunol 19:1370–1373 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/jmmcr/10.1099/jmmcr.0.000017
Loading
/content/journal/jmmcr/10.1099/jmmcr.0.000017
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error