1887

Abstract

Meticillin-resistant isolates were classified into three mupirocin susceptibility groups by the disc diffusion method using 5 and 200 μg mupirocin discs. The zone diameter observed for a 5 μg disc distinguished Mup from the resistant strains (either Mup or Mup). On the other hand, a 200 μg disc distinguished the high-resistance Mup strains from the other two (Mup or Mup). Thus, the concomitant use of 5 and 200 μg mupirocin discs allowed the clear distinction among the three mupirocin susceptibility groups, Mup, Mup or Mup.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.46965-0
2007-07-01
2020-08-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jmm/56/7/937.html?itemId=/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.46965-0&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Bastos M. C. F., Mondino P. J. J., Azevedo M. L., Santos K. R. N., Giambiagi-deMarval M. 1999; Molecular characterization and transfer among Staphylococcus strains of a plasmid conferring high-level resistance to mupirocin. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 18:393–398 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. CLSI 2006 Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk Susceptibility Tests , 9th edn. approved standard M2-A9 Wayne, PA: Clinical Laboratory Standard Institute;
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Deshpande L. M., Fix A. M., Pfaller M. A., Jones R. N. SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program Participants Group 2002; Emerging elevated mupirocin resistance rates among staphylococcal isolates in the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (2000): correlations of results from disk diffusion, E-test and reference dilution methods. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 42:283–290 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Eltringham I. 1997; Mupirocin resistance and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). J Hosp Infect 35:1–8
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Finlay J. E., Millar L. A., Poupard J. A. 1997; Interpretive criteria for testing susceptibility of staphylococci to mupirocin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 41:1137–1139
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Fuchs P. C., Jones R. N., Barry A. L. 1990; Interpretive criteria for disk diffusion susceptibility testing of mupirocin, a topical antibiotic. J Clin Microbiol 28:608–609
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Hudson I. R. 1994; The efficacy of intranasal mupirocin in the prevention of staphylococcal infections: a review of recent experience. J Hosp Infect 27:81–98 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Lowy F. D. 2003; Antimicrobial resistance: the example of Staphylococcus aureus . J Clin Invest 111:1265–1273 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Mondino P. J. J., Santos K. R. N., Bastos M. C. F., Giambiagi-deMarval M. 2003; Improvement of mupirocin E-test for susceptibility testing of Staphylococcus aureus . J Med Microbiol 52:385–387 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Nunes E. L., Santos K. R. N., Mondino P. J., Bastos M. C., Giambiagi-deMarval M. 1999; Detection of ileS-2 gene encoding mupirocin resistance in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus by multiplex PCR. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 34:77–81 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Palepou M. F., Johnson A. P., Cookson B. D., Beattie H., Charlett A., Woodford N. 1998; Evaluation of disc diffusion and Etest for determining the susceptibility of S taphylococcus aureus to mupirocin. J Antimicrob Chemother 42:577–583 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Santos K. R. N., Teixeira L. M., Leal G. S., Fonseca L. S., Gontijo Filho P. P. 1999; DNA typing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus : isolates and factors associated with nosocomial acquisition in two Brazilian university hospitals. J Med Microbiol 48:17–23 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.46965-0
Loading
/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.46965-0
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most cited this month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error