1887

Abstract

Farmers' lung disease (FLD) is a pulmonary disease that results from repeated inhalation of antigens from mouldy hay or straw. The objective of this prospective study was to assess the reliability of four serological techniques in FLD diagnosis. Sera from 15 consecutive patients with FLD, 15 healthy control farmers and 30 urban controls were analysed using four serological techniques [electrosyneresis (ES), Ouchterlony double diffusion (DD), ELISA and Western blot (WB)] with four antigens (, , and ). In the authors' region, ES on cellulose acetate with antigen was the most relevant diagnostic tool for discriminating FLD patients from healthy exposed farmers (sensitivity 87 %, specificity 100 %). DD tests were in accordance with ES, but their discriminatory power was lower. No threshold indicating both good sensitivity and specificity could be established with ELISA. WB analysis failed to identify specific bands for FLD. This study demonstrates the efficacy of determining precipitin levels with an appropriate technique, using a panel of antigens consistent with the specific exposure of a given area.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.46953-0
2007-10-01
2024-04-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jmm/56/10/1317.html?itemId=/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.46953-0&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. American Thoracic Society. 1998; Respiratory health hazards in agriculture. Medical Section of the American Lung Association. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 158:S1–S76 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Brummund W., Kurup V. P., Resnick A., Milson T. J., Fink J. N. 1988; Immunologic response to Faenia rectivirgula ( Micropolyspora faeni ) in a dairy family. J Allergy Clin Immunol 82:190–195 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Burrell P., Rylander R. 1981; A critical review of the role of precipitins in hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Eur J Respir Dis 62:332–343
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Cormier Y., Belanger J. 1989; The fluctuant nature of precipitating antibodies in dairy farmers. Thorax 44:469–473 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Cormier Y., Letourneau L., Racine G. 2004; Significance of precipitins and asymptomatic lymphocytic alveolitis: a 20-yr follow-up. Eur Respir J 23:523–525 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Dalphin J. C., Toson B., Monnet E., Pernet D., Dubiez A., Laplante J. J., Aiache J. M., Depierre A. 1994; Farmer's lung precipitins in Doubs (a department of France): prevalence and diagnostic value. Allergy 49:744–750 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Engvall E., Perlman P. 1971; Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Quantitative assay of immunoglobulin G. Immunochemistry 8:871–874 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Erkinjuntti-Pekkanen R., Reiman M., Kokkarinen J. I., Tukiainen H. O., Terho E. O. 1999; IgG antibodies, chronic bronchitis, and pulmonary function values in farmer's lung patients and matched controls. Allergy 54:1181–1187 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Gari M., Smets P., Pinon J. M., Recco P., Seguela J. P. 1982; Use of immuno-electro-diffusion on cellulose acetate for the research of the precipitating antibodies in the screening of patients suspected of farmer's lung disease. Mycopathologia 78:151–153 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Gariepy L., Cormier Y., Laviolette M., Tardif A. 1989; Predictive value of bronchoalveolar lavage cells and serum precipitins in asymptomatic dairy farmers. Am Rev Respir Dis 140:1386–1389 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Gruchow H. W., Hoffman R. G., Marx J. J. Jr, Emanuel D. A., Rimm A. A. 1981; Precipitating antibodies of farmer's lung antigens in a Wisconsin farming population. Am Rev Respir Dis 124:411–415
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Katila M. L., Mäntyjärvi R. A. 1987; Prognosis value of precipitins for working ability in dairy farmers. Eur J Respir Dis Suppl 152:146–154
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Lacasse Y., Selman M., Costabel U., Dalphin J. C., Ando M., Morell F., Erkinjuntti-Pekkanen R., Müller N., Colby T. V. other authors 2003; Clinical diagnosis of hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 168:952–958 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Laemmli U. K. 1970; Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227:680–685 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Lappalainen S., Pasanen A. L., Reiman M., Kalliokoski P. 1998; Serum IgG antibodies against Wallemia sebi and Fusarium species in Finnish farmers. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 81:585–592 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Ojanen T. 1992; Class specific antibodies in serodiagnosis of farmer's lung. Br J Ind Med 49:332–336
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Ouchterlony O. 1953; Antigen-antibody reaction in gels. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand 32:231–240
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Patel A. M., Ryu J. H., Reed C. E. 2001; Hypersensitivity pneumonitis: current concepts and future questions. J Allergy Clin Immunol 108:661–670 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Pépys J. 1969; Hypersensitivity diseases of the lungs due to fungi and organic dusts. Monogr Allergy 4:1–147
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Rautalahti M., Terho E. O., Ojanen T. 1990; Changes in the titers of IgG antibodies against farmer's lung antigens in the sera of healthy dairy farmers. Ann Allergy 64:455–458
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Reboux G., Piarroux R., Mauny F., Madroszyk A., Millon L., Bardonnet K., Dalphin J. C. 2001; Role of molds in farmer's lung disease in Eastern France. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 163:1534–1539 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Schuyler M., Cormier Y. 1997; The diagnosis of hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Chest 111:534–536 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Zweig M. H., Campbell G. 1993; Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine. Clin Chem 39:561–577
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.46953-0
Loading
/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.46953-0
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error