Biofilm formation on intrauterine devices in relation to duration of use

References

1. Bhagavan B. S., Gupta P. K. 1978; Genital actinomycosis and intrauterine contraceptive devices.Cytopathologic diagnosis and clinical significance. Hum Pathol 9:567–568 [CrossRef]
   [Google Scholar]
2. Farley T. M., Rosenberg M. J., Rowe P. J., Chen J. H., Meirik O. 1992; Intrauterine devices and pelvic inflammatory disease: an international perspective. Lancet 339:785–788 [CrossRef]
   [Google Scholar]
3. Ferraz do Lago R., Simoes J. A., Bahamondes L., Camargo R. P. S., Perrotti M., Monteiro I. 2003; Follow-up of users of intrauterine device with and without bacterial vaginosis and other cervicovaginal infections. Contraception 68:105–109 [CrossRef]
   [Google Scholar]
4. Grimes D. A. 1987; Intrauterine devices and pelvic inflammatory disease: recent developments. Contraception 36:97–107 [CrossRef]
   [Google Scholar]
5. Grimes D. A., Schultz K. F. 1999; Prophylactic antibiotics for intrauterine device insertion: a metaanalysis of the randomized controlled trials. Contraception 60:57–63 [CrossRef]
   [Google Scholar]
6. Gristina G. A. 1994; Biofilms and chronic bacterial infections. Clin Microbiol Newsl 16:171–176 [CrossRef]
   [Google Scholar]
7. Guerreiro D., Gigante M. A. M., Teles L. C. 1998; Sexually transmitted diseases and reproductive tract infections among contraceptive users. Int J Gynecol Obstet 63:167–173 [CrossRef]
   [Google Scholar]
8. Gupta P. K. 1982; Intrauterine contraceptive devices.Vaginal cytology, pathologic changes and clinical implications. Acta Cytol 26:571–613
   [Google Scholar]
9. Joesoef M. R., Karundeng A., Runtupalit C., Moran J. S., Lewis J. S., Ryan C. A. 2001; High rate of bacterial vaginosis among women with intrauterine devices in Manado, Indonesia. Contraception 64:169–172 [CrossRef]
   [Google Scholar]
10. Marrie T. J., Costerton J. W. 1983; A scanning and transmission electron microscopic study of the surfaces of intrauterine contraceptive devices. Am J Obstet Gynecol 146:384–394
    [Google Scholar]
11. Mishell D. R., Bell J. H., Good R. G., Moyer D. L. 1966; The intrauterine device: a bacteriologic study of the endometrial cavity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 96:119–126
    [Google Scholar]
12. Neuteboom K., de Kroon C. D., Dersjant-Roorda M., Jansen F. W. 2003; Follow-up visits after IUD-insertion: sense or nonsense? A technology assessment study to analyze the effectiveness of follow-up visits after IUD insertion. Contraception 68:101–104 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
13. Peterson H. B., Xia Z., Hughes J. M., Wilcox L. S., Tylor L. R., Trussell J. 1996; The risk of pregnancy after tubal sterilization: findings from the US Collaborative Preview of Sterilization. Am J Obstet Gynecol 174:1161–1170 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
14. Steen R., Shapiro K. 2004; Intrauterine contraceptive devices and risk of pelvic inflammatory disease: standard of care in high STI prevalence settings. Reprod Health Matters 23:136–143
    [Google Scholar]
15. Tsanadis G., Kalantaridou S. N., Kaponis A. & 7 other authors; 2002; Bacteriological cultures of removed intrauterine devices and pelvic inflammatory disease. Contraception 65:339–342 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]