Preliminary evaluation of one conventional nested and two real-time PCR assays for the detection of in immunocompromised patients Free

Abstract

Toxoplasma reactivation is a serious complication in patients receiving allogenic stem cell transplantation. Real-time PCR assays allow a rapid diagnosis of toxoplasma infection; however, no comparative data are available on the performance of real-time PCR protocols under routine conditions. Therefore, the aim of this study was to amplify DNA from routine samples of allogenic stem cell recipients using two real-time PCR assays on a LightCycler, and using conventional nested PCR. Conventional nested PCR revealed DNA in 16 samples. Only 12 of the 16 samples yielded a positive result in both real-time PCRs. The accuracy of the conventional PCR results was demonstrated by direct sequencing. Amplification and detection of the amplicon was completed in only 1 h using the real-time PCR assays. Thus, real-time PCR substantially accelerates the detection of DNA in the majority of positive specimens; however, conventional nested PCR is required for detection of DNA in some samples.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.45566-0
2004-07-01
2024-03-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jmm/53/7/JM530707.html?itemId=/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.45566-0&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Bell A. S., Ranford-Cartwright L. C. 2002; Real-time quantitative PCR in parasitology. Trends Parasitol 18:337–342
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Burg J. L., Grover C. M., Pouletty P., Boothroyd J. C. 1989; Direct and sensitive detection of a pathogenic protozoan, Toxoplasma gondii , by polymerase chain reaction. J Clin Microbiol 27:1787–1792
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Costa J. M., Pautas C., Ernault P., Foulet F., Cordonnier C., Bretagne S. 2000; Real-time PCR for diagnosis and follow-up of toxoplasma reactivation after allogeneic stem cell transplantation using fluorescence resonance energy transfer hybridization probes. J Clin Microbiol 38:2929–2932
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Homan W. L., Vercammen M., De Braekeleer J., Verschueren H. 2000; Identification of a 200- to 300-fold repetitive 529 bp DNA fragment in Toxoplasma gondii , and its use for diagnostic and quantitative PCR. Int J Parasitol 30:69–75 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Mele A., Paterson P. J., Prentice H. G., Leoni P., Kibbler C. C. 2002; Toxoplasmosis in bone marrow transplantation: a report of two cases and systematic review of the literature. Bone Marrow Transplant 29:691–698 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Murray L. J., Lee R., Martens C. 1990; In vivo cytokine gene expression in T cell subsets of the autoimmune MRL/Mp-lpr/lpr mouse. Eur J Immunol 20:163–170 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Reischl U., Bretagne S., Krüger D., Ernault P., Costa J. M. 2003; Comparison of two DNA targets for the diagnosis of toxoplasmosis by real-time PCR using fluorescence resonance energy transfer hybridization probes. BMC Infect Dis 3:7– 7 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Roth A., Roth B., Hoffken G., Steuber S., Khalifa K. I., Janitschke K. 1992; Application of the polymerase chain reaction in the diagnosis of pulmonary toxoplasmosis in immunocompromised patients. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 11:1177–1181 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Roth A., Mauch H., Göbel U. B. 2001; Quality standards for microbiological diagnostic techniques for infectious diseases. In Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques pp 1–28 Munich: Urban & Fischer;
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Teo I. A., Choi J. W., Morlese J., Taylor G., Shaunak S. 2002; LightCycler qPCR optimisation for low copy number target DNA. J Immunol Methods 270:119–133 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.45566-0
Loading
/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.45566-0
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most cited Most Cited RSS feed