1887

Abstract

Clindamycin is a possible antibiotic treatment of infections by Gram-positive cocci. However, its use can be limited by inducible clindamycin resistance. To screen for the presence of this type of resistance, the D-zone test is used. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of SirScan paper disks with that of Rosco Neo-Sensitabs for the D-zone test at distances according to dispensers provided by the manufacturers (25 mm) and when the disks are placed at a distance of 15 mm. We studied 364 Gram-stain-positive cocci representing clinical isolates that were resistant to erythromycin and susceptible to clindamycin. Out of these isolates, 207 (57 %) gave a positive D-zone test result at 25 mm distance using SirScan paper disks. When the test was repeated with the same disks placed 15 mm from the 157 (43 %) isolates that had previously given a negative result, 58 (36.9 %) gave a positive D-zone test result. The same isolates were also found to test positive when Rosco Neo-Sensitabs were used. Placing the disks at a distance of 15 mm instead of 25 mm led to an 84.3 % increase in positive D-tests among , 43.8 % among group B streptococci (GBS) and 6.4 % among coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS). In conclusion, the SirScan paper disks are equivalent to Rosco Neo-Sensitabs in screening for inducible resistance to clindamycin. The D-test needs to be performed at a shorter distance (15 mm) to prevent false-negative reporting.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.074641-0
2014-08-01
2021-10-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jmm/63/8/1052.html?itemId=/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.074641-0&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. EUCAST 2013; Antimicrobial susceptibility testing: EUCAST disk diffusion method, version 3.0.
  2. Fiebelkorn K. R., Crawford S. A., McElmeel M. L., Jorgensen J. H. 2003; Practical disk diffusion method for detection of inducible clindamycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci. J Clin Microbiol 41:4740–4744 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Fokas S., Fokas S., Tsironi M., Kalkani M., Dionysopouloy M. 2005; Prevalence of inducible clindamycin resistance in macrolide-resistant Staphylococcus spp. Clin Microbiol Infect 11:337–340 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Hamilton-Miller J. M., Shah S. 2000; Patterns of phenotypic resistance to the macrolide-lincosamide-ketolide-streptogramin group of antibiotics in staphylococci. J Antimicrob Chemother 46:941–949 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Hombach M., Zbinden R., Böttger E. C. 2013; Standardisation of disk diffusion results for antibiotic susceptibility testing using the sirscan automated zone reader. BMC Microbiol 13:225 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Jones R. N., Low D. E., Pfaller M. A. 1999; Epidemiologic trends in nosocomial and community-acquired infections due to antibiotic-resistant Gram-positive bacteria: the role of streptogramins and other newer compounds. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 33:101–112 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Jorgensen J. H., Crawford S. A., McElmeel M. L., Fiebelkorn K. R. 2004; Detection of inducible clindamycin resistance of staphylococci in conjunction with performance of automated broth susceptibility testing. J Clin Microbiol 42:1800–1802 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Lewis J. S. II, Jorgensen J. H. 2005; Inducible clindamycin resistance in Staphylococci: should clinicians and microbiologists be concerned?. Clin Infect Dis 40:280–285 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. O’Sullivan M. V., Cai Y., Kong F., Zeng X., Gilbert G. L. 2006; Influence of disk separation distance on accuracy of the disk approximation test for detection of inducible clindamycin resistance in Staphylococcus spp. J Clin Microbiol 44:4072–4076 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Siberry G. K., Tekle T., Carroll K., Dick J. 2003; Failure of clindamycin treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus expressing inducible clindamycin resistance in vitro. Clin Infect Dis 37:1257–1260 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Swenson J. M., Patel J. J. J. 2011; Special phenotypic methods for detecting antibacterial resistance. In Manual of Clinical Microbiology, 10th edn. vol. 2 pp. 1164–1165 Edited by Versalovic J., Jorgensen J. H., Funke G., Landry M. L., Warnock D. W. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology;
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.074641-0
Loading
/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.074641-0
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most cited this month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error