1887

Journal of Medical Microbiology logo

Volume 61, Issue 11

Evaluation of dry and wet transport of at-home self-collected vaginal swabs for human papillomavirus testing Free

Abstract

Our objective was to compare human papillomavirus (HPV) detection in paired self-collected vaginal samples transported by overnight mail in liquid specimen transport medium (STM) (wet) or in dry tubes (dry). Women aged 18–24 years were recruited online to self-collect vaginal swab samples at home for HPV testing and 159 women returned paired wet and dry samples. Dry samples were rehydrated with STM upon arrival at the laboratory. HPV was detected by the Roche Linear Array HPV genotyping test (37 genotypes) and Kappa and McNemar statistics were used to compare wet versus dry samples for detecting HPV. Of the subjects tested in this study, 51 % were HPV-positive (in either sample) and 40 % were positive for high-risk HPV. A total of 216 type-specific infections were detected among the 80 HPV-positive women. Almost perfect agreement was observed between paired samples for detecting any HPV (subject-level positive agreement: 91.9 %, κ: 0.85) or type-specific HPV (positive agreement across types: 90.1 %, κ: 0.90). Similar agreement between sample types was seen when testing for high-risk types and 81.9 % of all type-specific infections were detected in both samples. Among discordant pairs, wet samples were 3.3 times more likely to be positive for type-specific HPV than dry samples ( = 0.02). However, in 63.6 % of wet-positive/dry-negative discordant pairs analysed for viral load, type-specific HPV was either undetectable or detected at a low level (<100 copies) in the wet samples, suggesting that the majority of infections missed by using dry samples are less likely to be clinically relevant. Our results indicate that dry transport is a feasible option for transporting at-home self-collected vaginal samples for HPV DNA testing.

  • Received:
  • Accepted:
  • Published Online:
© 2012 SGM
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.046110-0
2012-11-01
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jmm/61/11/1538.html?itemId=/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.046110-0&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Agorastos T., Dinas K., Lloveras B., Font R., Kornegay J. R., Bontis J., de Sanjose S. 2005; Self-sampling versus physician-sampling for human papillomavirus testing. Int J STD AIDS 16:727–729 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Baay M. F., Verhoeven V., Lambrechts H. A., Pattyn G. G., Lardon F., Van Royen P., Vermorken J. B. 2009; Feasibility of collecting self-sampled vaginal swabs by mail: quantity and quality of genomic DNA. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 28:1285–1289 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Balasubramanian A., Kulasingam S. L., Baer A., Hughes J. P., Myers E. R., Mao C., Kiviat N. B., Koutsky L. A. 2010; Accuracy and cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer screening by high-risk human papillomavirus DNA testing of self-collected vaginal samples. J Low Genit Tract Dis 14:185–195 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Banura C., Franceschi S., van Doorn L. J., Wabwire-Mangen F., Mbidde E. K., Weiderpass E. 2008; Detection of cervical human papillomavirus infection in filter paper samples: a comparative study. J Med Microbiol 57:253–255 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Bauer H. M., Ting Y., Greer C. E., Chambers J. C., Tashiro C. J., Chimera J., Reingold A., Manos M. M. 1991; Genital human papillomavirus infection in female university students as determined by a PCR-based method. JAMA 265:472–477 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Cicchetti D. V., Feinstein A. R. 1990; High agreement but low kappa: II. Resolving the paradoxes. J Clin Epidemiol 43:551–558 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Cuzick J., Arbyn M., Sankaranarayanan R., Tsu V., Ronco G., Mayrand M. H., Dillner J., Meijer C. J. 2008; Overview of human papillomavirus-based and other novel options for cervical cancer screening in developed and developing countries. Vaccine 26:Suppl. 10K29–K41 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Feng Q., Cherne S., Winer R. L., Popov V., Zambrano H., Yerovi C., Hawes S. E., Koutsky L. A., Kiviat N. B. 2010; Evaluation of transported dry and wet cervical exfoliated samples for detection of human papillomavirus infection. J Clin Microbiol 48:3068–3072 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Gaydos C. A., Crotchfelt K. A., Shah N., Tennant M., Quinn T. C., Gaydos J. C., McKee K. T. Jr, Rompalo A. M. 2002; Evaluation of dry and wet transported intravaginal swabs in detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections in female soldiers by PCR. J Clin Microbiol 40:758–761 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Gravitt P. E., Belinson J. L., Salmeron J., Shah K. V. 2011; Looking ahead: a case for human papillomavirus testing of self-sampled vaginal specimens as a cervical cancer screening strategy. Int J Cancer 129:517–527 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Kahn J. A., Slap G. B., Huang B., Rosenthal S. L., Wanchick A. M., Kollar L. M., Hillard P. A., Witte D., Groen P., Bernstein D. I. 2004; Comparison of adolescent and young adult self-collected and clinician-collected samples for human papillomavirus. Obstet Gynecol 103:952–959 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Kailash U., Hedau S., Gopalkrishna V., Katiyar S., Das B. C. 2002; A simple ‘paper smear’ method for dry collection, transport and storage of cervical cytological specimens for rapid screening of HPV infection by PCR. J Med Microbiol 51:606–610[PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Landis J. R., Koch G. G. 1977; The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Moscicki A. B. 1993; Comparison between methods for human papillomavirus DNA testing: a model for self-testing in young women. J Infect Dis 167:723–725 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Muñoz N., Castellsagué X., de González A. B., Gissmann L. 2006; Chapter 1: HPV in the etiology of human cancer. Vaccine 24:Suppl. 3S1–10 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Schlecht N. F., Trevisan A., Duarte-Franco E., Rohan T. E., Ferenczy A., Villa L. L., Franco E. L. 2003; Viral load as a predictor of the risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Int J Cancer 103:519–524 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Schmeink C. E., Bekkers R. L., Massuger L. F., Melchers W. J. 2011; The potential role of self-sampling for high-risk human papillomavirus detection in cervical cancer screening. Rev Med Virol 21:139–153 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Sellors J. W., Lorincz A. T., Mahony J. B., Mielzynska I., Lytwyn A., Roth P., Howard M., Chong S., Daya D. other authors 2000; Comparison of self-collected vaginal, vulvar and urine samples with physician-collected cervical samples for human papillomavirus testing to detect high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions. CMAJ 163:513–518[PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Shah K. V., Daniel R. W., Tennant M. K., Shah N., McKee K. T. Jr, Gaydos C. A., Gaydos J. C., Rompalo A. 2001; Diagnosis of human papillomavirus infection by dry vaginal swabs in military women. Sex Transm Infect 77:260–264 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Shukla S., Bharti A. C., Mahata S., Hussain S., Hedau S., Sharma R., Pillai M. R., Krishna S., Chiplunkar S. other authors 2010; Application of a multiplex PCR to cervical cells collected by a paper smear for the simultaneous detection of all mucosal human papillomaviruses (HPVs) and typing of high-risk HPV types 16 and 18. J Med Microbiol 59:1303–1310 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  21. StataCorp 2009 Stata Statistical Software: Release 11 College Station, TX: StataCorp LP;
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Weaver B. A., Feng Q., Holmes K. K., Kiviat N., Lee S. K., Meyer C., Stern M., Koutsky L. A. 2004; Evaluation of genital sites and sampling techniques for detection of human papillomavirus DNA in men. J Infect Dis 189:677–685 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Winer R. L., Lee S. K., Hughes J. P., Adam D. E., Kiviat N. B., Koutsky L. A. 2003; Genital human papillomavirus infection: incidence and risk factors in a cohort of female university students. Am J Epidemiol 157:218–226 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Winer R. L., Feng Q., Hughes J. P., Yu M., Kiviat N. B., O’Reilly S., Koutsky L. A. 2007; Concordance of self-collected and clinician-collected swab samples for detecting human papillomavirus DNA in women 18 to 32 years of age. Sex Transm Dis 34:371–377[PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.046110-0
Loading
Evaluation of dry and wet transport of at-home self-collected vaginal swabs for human papillomavirus testing
J. Med. Microbiol. 61, 1538 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.046110-0
/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.046110-0
/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.046110-0
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error