1887

Abstract

The anti-staphylococcal activity of an ethanol extract of and its pure compound, rhodomyrtone, as well as their effects on staphylococcal biofilm formation and biofilm-grown cells were assessed. MIC and minimal bactericidal concentration values of the ethanol extract and rhodomyrtone against planktonic cultures and biofilms of five clinical strains each of and , and American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) strains of both species, were 32–512 and 0.25–2 µg ml, respectively. Results from time–kill studies indicated that rhodomyrtone at a concentration of 4× MIC could reduce the number of ATCC 25923 and ATCC 35984 cells by 99.9 % within 3 and 13 h, respectively. The ability of rhodomyrtone and the ethanol extract to prevent biofilm formation and kill mature biofilms was assessed: both demonstrated better activity than vancomycin at inhibiting staphylococcal biofilm formation. In addition, the viability of 24 h and 5-day staphylococcal biofilm-grown cells decreased after treatment with the ethanol extract and rhodomyrtone. The ability to reduce biofilm formation and kill mature biofilms occurred in a dose-dependent manner. Scanning electron microscopy clearly confirmed that treatment with rhodomyrtone at 16× MIC could reduce 24 h biofilm formation and the numbers of staphylococci, whilst at 64× MIC this compound destroyed the organisms in the 5-day established biofilm. These results suggest that rhodomyrtone has the potential for further drug development for the treatment of biofilm-forming staphylococcal infections.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.033092-0
2011-12-01
2020-12-03
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jmm/60/12/1793.html?itemId=/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.033092-0&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Cerca N., Martins S., Cerca F., Jefferson K. K., Pier G. B., Oliveira R., Azeredo J. 2005; Comparative assessment of antibiotic susceptibility of coagulase-negative staphylococci in biofilm versus planktonic culture as assessed by bacterial enumeration or rapid XTT colorimetry. J Antimicrob Chemother 56:331–336 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. CLSI 2006; Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria that Grow Aerobically, 7th edn; Approved Standard. M7-A7. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute;
  3. Cowan M. M. 1999; Plant products as antimicrobial agents. Clin Microbiol Rev 12:564–582[PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Frank K. L., Reichert E. J., Piper K. E., Patel R. 2007; In vitro effects of antimicrobial agents on planktonic and biofilm forms of Staphylococcus lugdunensis clinical isolates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 51:888–895 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Götz F. 2002; Staphylococcus and biofilms. Mol Microbiol 43:1367–1378 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Hui W.-H., Li M.-M., Luk K. 1975; Triterpenoids and steroids from Rhodomyrtus tomentosa . Phytochemistry 14:833–834 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Jefferson K. K., Goldmann D. A., Pier G. B. 2005; Use of confocal microscopy to analyze the rate of vancomycin penetration through Staphylococcus aureus biofilms. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 49:2467–2473 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Karaolis D. K., Rashid M. H., Chythanya R., Luo W., Hyodo M., Hayakawa Y. 2005; c-di-GMP (3′-5′-cyclic diguanylic acid) inhibits Staphylococcus aureus cell–cell interactions and biofilm formation. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 49:1029–1038 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Knowles J. R., Roller S., Murray D. B., Naidu A. S. 2005; Antimicrobial action of carvacrol at different stages of dual-species biofilm development by Staphylococcus aureus and Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:797–803 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Kuźma L., Rózalski M., Walencka E., Rózalska B., Wysokińska H. 2007; Antimicrobial activity of diterpenoids from hairy roots of Salvia sclarea L.: salvipisone as a potential anti-biofilm agent active against antibiotic resistant staphylococci. Phytomedicine 14:31–35 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Kwieciński J., Eick S., Wójcik K. 2009; Effects of tea tree (Melaleuca alternifolia) oil on Staphylococcus aureus in biofilms and stationary growth phase. Int J Antimicrob Agents 33:343–347 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Limsuwan S., Voravuthikunchai S. P. 2008; Boesenbergia pandurata (Roxb.) Schltr., Eleutherine americana Merr. and Rhodomyrtus tomentosa (Aiton) Hassk. as antibiofilm producing and antiquorum sensing in Streptococcus pyogenes . FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 53:429–436 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Limsuwan S., Trip E. N., Kouwen T. R., Piersma S., Hiranrat A., Mahabusarakam W., Voravuthikunchai S. P., van Dijl J. M., Kayser O. 2009; Rhodomyrtone: a new candidate as natural antibacterial drug from Rhodomyrtus tomentosa . Phytomedicine 16:645–651 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Limsuwan S., Hesseling-Meinders A., Voravuthikunchai S. P., van Dijl J. M., Kayser O. 2011; Potential antibiotic and anti-infective effects of rhodomyrtone from Rhodomyrtus tomentosa (Aiton) Hassk. on Streptococcus pyogenes as revealed by proteomics. Phytomedicine 18:934–940 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Liu Y., Hou A., Ji C., Wu Y. 1998; Isolation and structure of hydrolysable tannins from Rhodomyrtus tomentosa . Tianran Chanwu Yanjiu Yu Kaifa 10:14–19
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Mah T.-F. C., O’Toole G. A. 2001; Mechanisms of biofilm resistance to antimicrobial agents. Trends Microbiol 9:34–39 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Marino A., Bellinghieri V., Nostro A., Miceli N., Taviano M. F., Güvenç A., Bisignano G. 2010; In vitro effect of branch extracts of Juniperus species from Turkey on Staphylococcus aureus biofilm. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 59:470–476[PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Nishimura S., Tsurumoto T., Yonekura A., Adachi K., Shindo H. 2006; Antimicrobial susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms isolated from infected total hip arthroplasty cases. J Orthop Sci 11:46–50 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Nostro A., Sudano Roccaro A., Bisignano G., Marino A., Cannatelli M. A., Pizzimenti F. C., Cioni P. L., Procopio F., Blanco A. R. 2007; Effects of oregano, carvacrol and thymol on Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms. J Med Microbiol 56:519–523 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Saising J., Hiranrat A., Mahabusarakam W., Ongsakul M., Voravuthikunchai S. P. 2008; Rhodomyrtone from Rhodomyrtus tomentosa (Aiton) Hassk. as a natural antibiotic for staphylococcal cutaneous infections. J Health Sci 54:589–595 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Salni D., Sargent M. V., Skelton B. W., Soediro I., Sutisna M., White A. H., Yulinah E. 2002; Rhodomyrtone, an antibiotic from Rhodomyrtus tomentosa . Aust J Chem 55:229–232 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Sianglum W., Srimanote P., Wonglumsom W., Kittiniyom K., Voravuthikunchai S. P. 2011; Proteome analyses of cellular proteins in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus treated with rhodomyrtone, a novel antibiotic candidate. PLoS ONE 6:e16628 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Voravuthikunchai S. P., Dolah S., Charernjiratrakul W. 2010; Control of Bacillus cereus in foods by Rhodomyrtus tomentosa (Ait.) Hassk. leaf extract and its purified compound. J Food Prot 73:1907–1912[PubMed] [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Wang X., Yao X., Zhu Z., Tang T., Dai K., Sadovskaya I., Flahaut S., Jabbouri S. 2009; Effect of berberine on Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm formation. Int J Antimicrob Agents 34:60–66 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.033092-0
Loading
/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.033092-0
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most cited this month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error