1887

Abstract

The UK National External Quality Assessment Service (UK NEQAS) distributes clinically relevant and educational specimens for external quality assessment (EQA). The aim of this report was to assess the suitability of using a freeze-dried specimen format for the EQA of conventional and rapid methods and to review the methods used by participants to screen for meticillin-resistant (MRSA). Of the 714 laboratories that returned a result, 678 reported the presence of MRSA, and results showed a mean of 73 c.f.u. per 25 μl and a median of 50 c.f.u. per 25 μl confirming that the specimen was homogeneous. Four different approaches to MRSA screening were used routinely, including: (i) liquid culture; (ii) direct plating onto conventional media; (iii) direct plating onto chromogenic media; and (iv) rapid methods. A wide variety of methods were used within each of these four categories to screen for MRSA, and many laboratories reported using more than one method. Attempts should be made to determine the most appropriate approach to MRSA screening and to standardize the protocols across the UK.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.019737-0
2010-10-01
2019-10-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jmm/59/10/1153.html?itemId=/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.019737-0&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Brown, D. F., Edwards, D. I., Hawkey, P. M., Morrison, D., Ridgway, G. L., Towner, K. J. & Wren, M. W. ( 2005; ). Guidelines for the laboratory diagnosis and susceptibility testing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). J Antimicrob Chemother 56, 1000–1018.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Carson, J., Lui, B., Rosmus, L., Rennick, H. & Fuller, J. ( 2009; ). Interpretation of MRSASelect screening agar at 24 hours of incubation. J Clin Microbiol 47, 566–568.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Department of Health ( 2006; ). Screening for Meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) colonisation: a strategy for NHS Trusts – a summary of best practice.
  4. Gordon, R. J. & Lowy, F. D. ( 2008; ). Pathogenesis of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection. Clin Infect Dis 46, S350–S359.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Hardy, K. J., Szczepura, A., Davies, R., Bradbury, A., Stallard, N., Gossain, S., Walley, P. & Hawkey, P. M. ( 2007; ). A study of the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of MRSA screening and monitoring on surgical wards using a new, rapid molecular test. BMC Health Serv Res 7, 160.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Kelly, S., Hardwick, R., Wong, J. & Rao, G. G. ( 2004; ). Laboratory evaluation of selective mannitol broth for MRSA screening. J Hosp Infect 58, 239–240.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Kluytmans, J. ( 2007; ). Control of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and the value of rapid tests. J Hosp Infect 65, 100–104.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Svent-Kucina, N., Pirs, M., Mueller-Premru, M., Cvitkovic-Spik, V., Kofol, R. & Seme, K. ( 2009; ). One-year experience with modified BD GeneOhm MRSA assay for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from pooled nasal, skin, and throat samples. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 63, 132–139.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Tande, D., Garo, B., Ansart, S. & Lejeune, B. ( 2008; ). Efficiency of CHROMagar-MRSA in detecting meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a routine setting. J Hosp Infect 70, 388–389.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. van Hal, S. J., Jennings, Z., Stark, D., Marriott, D. & Harkness, J. ( 2009; ). MRSA detection: comparison of two molecular methods (BD GeneOhm PCR assay and Easy-Plex) with two selective MRSA agars (MRSA-ID and Oxoid MRSA) for nasal swabs. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 28, 47–53.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Wolk, D. M., Picton, E., Johnson, D., Davis, T., Pancholi, P., Ginocchio, C. C., Finegold, S., Welch, D. F., de Boer, M. & other authors ( 2009; ). Multicenter evaluation of the Cepheid Xpert methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) test as a rapid screening method for detection of MRSA in nares. J Clin Microbiol 47, 758–764.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.019737-0
Loading
/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.019737-0
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error