1887

Abstract

An increase in the prevalence of tuberculosis (TB) in recent years has accelerated the search for novel tools for the rapid diagnosis of TB infection. This study evaluated the GenoType Mycobacteria Direct (GTMD) assay (Hain Lifescience) for direct detection of the complex (MTBC) from sputum samples and compared it with conventional methods. The GTMD test is a commercial assay produced using strip techniques and works based on a nucleic acid sequence-based amplification technique. This test allows 23S rRNA amplification-based detection of MTBC, , , and directly from decontaminated clinical samples within 6 h. In the present study, 115 sputum samples were processed to detect acid-fast bacilli (AFB) using two microscopy methods (carbol fuchsin and fluorescent staining), two culture methods [Löwenstein–Jensen (LJ) and BACTEC 12B media] and the GTMD test. The results showed that 86 of the samples were positive by direct microscopy, 84 were positive by BACTEC 12B culture, 73 were positive by LJ culture and 95 were positive by the GTMD test. All of the isolates turned out to be MTBC. Moreover, the sensitivity and specificity of the GTMD test for MTBC in patients were 97 and 58 %, respectively, taking the culture combination as the gold standard. When the test was compared with culture of samples from anti-TB-treated patients, the sensitivity and specificity for the test were 100 and 15 %, respectively. Low specificity in treated people might arise from depressed proliferation of AFB. As the two methods target the same living bacilli, the difference is obviously notable. When the culture results and clinical findings of the patients were evaluated together (true-positive specimens), the sensitivity and specificity values of the GTMD test for all patients were 97 and 90 %, respectively. However, both of these values increased to 100 % for the patients receiving anti-TB treatment. These results implied that, to determine whether the patient's sputum contains living AFB, more sensitive techniques should be employed during the follow-up of the patients. These observations suggest that the GTMD method can be useful for early diagnosis of clinically and radiologically suspicious TB cases where smears are negative for . In addition, the use of a GTMD test in smear-positive cases is helpful and practical in order to identify MTBC quickly. This allows more rapid treatment decisions and infection control precautions.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.013490-0
2010-08-01
2020-08-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jmm/59/8/930.html?itemId=/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.013490-0&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. American Thoracic Society Workshop 1997; Rapid diagnostic test for tuberculosis. What is the appropriate use?. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 155:1804–1814 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Boden D., Weizenegger M., Benz K., Ponstingl W., Hengstler M., Rusch-Gerdes S., Fahr A., Bartel J. 1998; Reverse hybridization assay for rapid identification of mycobacteria from cultured samples. Clin Lab 44:687–692
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Corbett E. L., Watt C. J., Walker N., Maher D., Williams B. G., Raviglione M. C., Dye C. 2003; The growing burden of tuberculosis: global trends and interactions with the HIV epidemic. Arch Intern Med 163:1009–1021 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Drobniewski F. A., Caws M., Gibson A., Young D. 2003; Modern laboratory diagnosis of tuberculosis. Lancet Infect Dis 3:141–147 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Franco-Alvarez de Luna F., Ruiz P., Gutiérrez J., Casal M. 2006; Evaluation of the GenoType Mycobacteria Direct assay for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex and four atypical mycobacterial species in clinical samples. J Clin Microbiol 44:3025–3027 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Hellyer T. J., Fletcher T. W., Bates J. H., Stead W. W., Templeton G. C., Cave M. D., Eisenach K. D. 1996; Strand displacement amplification and the polymerase chain reaction for monitoring response to treatment in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis. J Infect Dis 173:934–941 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Marks G. L. 1993; Genetics of tuberculosis. Med Clin North Am 77:1219–1233
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Metchock B. G., Nolte F. S., Wallace R. J. 1999; Mycobacterium. In Manual of Clinical Microbiology , 7th edn. pp 399–437 Edited by Murray P. R., Baron E. J., Pfaller M. A., Tenover F. C., Yolken R. H. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology;
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Murray P. R., Rosenthal K. S., Pfaller M. A. 2005; Mycobacterium. In Medical Microbiology , 5th edn. pp 297–310 Philadelphia: Elsevier Mosby;
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Piersimoni C., Scarparo C. 2003; Relevance of commercial amplification methods for direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in clinical samples. J Clin Microbiol 41:5355–5365 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Piersimoni C., Scarparo C., Piccoli P., Rigon A., Ruggiero G., Nista D., Bornigia S. 2002; Performance assessment of two commercial amplification assays for direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex from respiratory and extrapulmonary specimens. J Clin Microbiol 40:4138–4142 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Seagar A.-L., Prendergast C., Emmanuel F. X., Rayner A., Thomson S., Laurenson I. F. 2008; Evaluation of the GenoType Mycobacteria Direct assay for the simultaneous detection of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex and four atypical mycobacterial species in smear-positive respiratory specimens. J Med Microbiol 57:605–611 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Singh P., Kant L., Shah B., Muthuswamy V., Saxena N. C. 2002; What is new in the diagnosis of tuberculosis? Part I: Techniques for diagnosis of tuberculosis. Indian Counc Med Res Bull 32: http://www.icmr.nic.in/buaug02.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Van der Vliet G. M., Schepers P., Schukkink R. A., van Gemen B., Klatser P. R. 1994; Assessment of mycobacterial viability by RNA amplification. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 38:1959–1965 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Weizenegger M., Hengstler M., Feldmann K., Fahr A. 2004; Direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis -complex and four nontuberculosis mycobacteria: preliminary data of an evaluation in a hospital and a private laboratory [poster presentation]. In 25th Annual Congress of the European Society of Mycobacteriology (ESM) 27-30 June 2004 Alghero, Sardinia, Italy:
    [Google Scholar]
  16. WHO 2007; Global tuberculosis control – surveillance, planning, financing. WHO/HTM/TB/2007.376. http://www.who.int/tb/publications/global_report/2007/en
  17. Woods G. L. 2001; Molecular techniques in mycobacterial detection. Arch Pathol Lab Med 125:122–126
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.013490-0
Loading
/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.013490-0
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most cited this month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error