Skip to content
1887

Abstract

The FnBPA and FnBPB proteins promote acid-induced biofilm accumulation. Meticillin-resistant (MRSA) isolates from device-related infections with both and produced significantly more biofilm than isolates with either gene alone. Under mildly acidic growth conditions, FnBP-mediated biofilm and and transcript levels were substantially higher during growth at 37 °C than at 30 °C. Thus, in addition to a lowered pH, carriage of both and and growth at 37 °C promote MRSA biofilm development, further supporting a role for the FnBPA and FnBPB surface proteins in the pathogenesis of MRSA device-related infections.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.005504-0
2009-04-01
2025-11-13

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Christensen G. D., Simpson W. A., Younger J. J., Baddour L. M., Barrett F. F., Melton D. M., Beachey E. H. 1985; Adherence of coagulase-negative staphylococci to plastic tissue culture plates: a quantitative model for the adherence of staphylococci to medical devices. J Clin Microbiol 22:996–1006
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Fitzpatrick F., Humphreys H., O'Gara J. P. 2005; Evidence for icaADBC -independent biofilm development mechanism in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates. J Clin Microbiol 43:1973–1976 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Foster T. J., Hook M. 1998; Surface protein adhesins of Staphylococcus aureus . Trends Microbiol 6:484–488 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Goerke C., Campana S., Bayer M. G., Doring G., Botzenhart K., Wolz C. 2000; Direct quantitative transcript analysis of the agr regulon of Staphylococcus aureus during human infection in comparison to the expression profile in vitro . Infect Immun 68:1304–1311 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Montdargent B., Letourneur D. 2000; Toward new biomaterials. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 21:404–410 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. O'Gara J. P. 2007; ica and beyond: biofilm mechanisms and regulation in Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus aureus . FEMS Microbiol Lett 270:179–188 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. O'Grady N. P. 2002; Applying the science to the prevention of catheter-related infections. J Crit Care 17:114–121 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. O'Neill E., Pozzi C., Houston P., Smyth D., Humphreys H., Robinson D. A., O'Gara J. P. 2007; Association between methicillin susceptibility and biofilm regulation in Staphylococcus aureus isolates from device-related infections. J Clin Microbiol 45:1379–1388 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. O'Neill E., Pozzi C., Houston P., Humphreys H., Robinson D. A., Loughman A., Foster T. J., O'Gara J. P. 2008; A novel Staphylococcus aureus biofilm phenotype mediated by the fibronectin-binding proteins, FnBPA and FnBPB. J Bacteriol 190:3835–3850 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Ziebuhr W., Heilmann C., Gotz F., Meyer P., Wilms K., Straube E., Hacker J. 1997; Detection of the intercellular adhesion gene cluster ( ica ) and phase variation in Staphylococcus epidermidis blood culture strains and mucosal isolates. Infect Immun 65:890–896
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.005504-0
Loading
/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.005504-0
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error