Skip to content
1887

Abstract

Fungal keratitis, particularly in tropical and subtropical regions, poses significant therapeutic challenges due to biofilm formation by fungal pathogens. These biofilms confer increased resistance to antifungal treatments and are associated with poorer clinical outcomes.

. Despite growing recognition of their impact, there remains a lack of comprehensive synthesis on the role of fungal biofilms in corneal ulcers.

This study aims to determine the impact of and how biofilm formation influences the chronicity and treatment outcomes in fungal corneal ulcers.

A comprehensive literature search was performed across PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus and the Cochrane Library in April 2025. Only English articles were included, and animal studies were excluded. Eligible studies included clinical and investigations that assessed biofilm formation in fungal corneal ulcers and its impact on antifungal susceptibility and treatment outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) 2020 guidelines and registered under PROSPERO (an international systematic review registry, ID:CRD420251017502). Independent data extraction was done by two reviewers. Data on MICs were synthesized using random-effects models, and heterogeneity was assessed with I² statistics and Cochran’s Q test. Clinical outcomes were analysed narratively due to reporting variability.

Seven studies were included, spanning Brazil, India, China and Mexico, and covering both and clinical designs. Meta-analysis showed significantly increased MIC values for biofilm-forming fungal isolates: amphotericin B [pooled log fold change=5.31; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.92–7.70], voriconazole (6.06; 95% CI: 2.25–9.87) and natamycin (1.25; 95% CI: 0.48–2.02). High heterogeneity was noted for amphotericin B and voriconazole, while results for natamycin were consistent. Narrative synthesis of clinical data indicated that biofilm formation is associated with prolonged healing times, increased recurrence rates, reduced visual acuity and higher complication risks.

Biofilm formation by fungal pathogens significantly reduces antifungal susceptibility and worsens clinical outcomes in fungal keratitis. Elevated MIC, delayed healing and increased rates of complications emphasize the need for targeted biofilm-disrupting therapies and standardized diagnostic protocols. Future research should focus on developing clinical strategies that integrate biofilm assessment to improve patient outcomes.

  • This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.002106
2025-12-18
2026-01-16

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jmm/74/12/jmm002106.html?itemId=/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.002106&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Byrd LB, Gurnani B, Ulcer MNC. Corneal ulcer. In StatPearls Treasure Island: StatPearls Publishing; 2024
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Mohan M, Natarajan R, Kaur K, Gurnani B. Clinical approach to corneal ulcers. TNOA J Ophthalmic Sci Res 2023; 61:386–395 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Ahmed F, House RJ, Feldman BH. Corneal abrasions and corneal foreign bodies. Prim Care 2015; 42:363–375 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Lamas-Francis D, Navarro D, Mansilla R, de-Rojas V, Moreno C et al. Fungal keratitis in Northwestern Spain: epidemiology, risk factors and outcomes. J Fungi (Basel) 2024; 10:689 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Ahmadikia K, Aghaei Gharehbolagh S, Fallah B, Naeimi Eshkaleti M, Malekifar P et al. Distribution, prevalence, and causative agents of fungal keratitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis (1990 to 2020). Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2021; 11:698780 [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bartimote C, Foster J, Watson S. The spectrum of microbial keratitis: an updated review. Open Ophthalmol J 2019; 13:100–130 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Khor W-B, Prajna VN, Garg P, Mehta JS, Xie L et al. The Asia cornea society infectious keratitis study: a prospective multicenter study of infectious keratitis in Asia. Am J Ophthalmol 2018; 195:161–170 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Donovan C, Arenas E, Ayyala RS, Margo CE, Espana EM. Fungal keratitis: mechanisms of infection and management strategies. Surv Ophthalmol 2022; 67:758–769 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Tuft S, Evans J, Gordon I, Leck A, Stone N et al. Antimicrobial resistance in topical treatments for microbial keratitis: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e069338 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Awad R, Ghaith AA, Awad K, Mamdouh Saad M, Elmassry AA. Fungal keratitis: diagnosis, management, and recent advances. Clin Ophthalmol 2024; 18:85–106 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Das S, Sanjeev H, Banik A. Fungal corneal ulcer: A prospective study on the causative fungus and the response to the present treatment protocol at ANIIMS, Andaman and Nicobar Islands-first time present. Med J DY Patil Vidyapeeth 2019; 12:105 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Suman S, Kumar A, Saxena I, Kumar M. Fungal Keratitis: Recent Advances in Diagnosis and Treatment. In Infectious Eye Diseases - Recent Advances in Diagnosis and Treatment IntechOpen; 2021 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Maharana PK, Sharma N, Nagpal R, Jhanji V, Das S et al. Recent advances in diagnosis and management of mycotic keratitis. Indian J Ophthalmol 2016; 64:346–357 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Gopinathan U, Sharma S, Garg P, Rao GN. Review of epidemiological features, microbiological diagnosis and treatment outcome of microbial keratitis: experience of over a decade. Indian J Ophthalmol 2009; 57:273–279 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Prajna NV, Srinivasan M, Mascarenhas J, Lalitha P, Rajaraman R et al. Visual impairment in fungal versus bacterial corneal ulcers 4 years after successful antimicrobial treatment. Am J Ophthalmol 2019; 204:124–129 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Austin A, Lietman T, Rose-Nussbaumer J. Update on the management of infectious keratitis. Ophthalmology 2017; 124:1678–1689 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Lin HC, Lin JL, Lin-Tan DT, Ma HK, Chen HC. Early keratectomy in the treatment of moderate fusarium keratitis. PLoS One 2012; 7:e42126 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Gurnani B, Kaur K. Therapeutic Keratoplasty StatPearls Publishing; 2023
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Costa-Orlandi C, Sardi J, Pitangui N, De Oliveira H, Scorzoni L et al. Fungal biofilms and polymicrobial diseases. J Fungi 2017; 3:22 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Petrillo F, Sinoca M, Fea AM, Galdiero M, Maione A et al. Candida biofilm eye infection: main aspects and advance in novel agents as potential source of treatment. Antibiotics 2023; 12:1277 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Fingerhut L, Cheng KKW, Ali A, Mills B. Implications of Fungal Biofilms in Microbial Keratitis. In Fungal Biofilms 2025 pp 335–394 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Fattahi M, Ghasemi R, Pinegina O, Bahrami MM, Hosseini M et al. Effect of voriconazole on biofilm of filamentous species isolated from keratitis. Arch Clin Infect Dis 2022; 16: [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Yi J, Sun Y, Zeng C, Kostoulias X, Qu Y. The role of biofilms in contact lens associated fungal keratitis. Antibiotics (Basel) 2023; 12:1533 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Gulati M, Lohse MB, Ennis CL, Gonzalez RE, Perry AM et al. In vitro culturing and screening of Candida albicans biofilms. Curr Protoc Microbiol 2018; 50:e60 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Salvador A, Veiga FF, Svidzinski TIE, Negri M. In vitro ability of Fusarium keratoplasticum to form biofilms in venous catheter. Microb Pathog 2022; 173:105868 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Zhang X, Sun X, Wang Z, Zhang Y, Hou W. Keratitis-associated fungi form biofilms with reduced antifungal drug susceptibility. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2012; 53:7774–7778 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Calvillo-Medina RP, Reyes-Grajeda JP, Barba-Escoto L, Bautista-Hernandez LA, Campos-Guillén J et al. Proteome analysis of biofilm produced by a Fusarium falciforme keratitis infectious agent. Microb Pathog 2019; 130:232–241 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. de Chaves MA, Ferreira do Amaral T, Monteiro da Silva Rodrigues Coutinho N, Fernanda Andrzejewski Kaminski T, Teixeira ML et al. Synergistic association of clioquinol with antifungal drugs against biofilm forms of clinical Fusarium isolates. Mycoses 2020; 63:1069–1082 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Ranjith K, Sontam B, Sharma S, Joseph J, Chathoth KN et al. Candida species from eye infections: drug susceptibility, virulence factors, and molecular characterization. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2017; 58:4201–4209 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Bezerra FM, Rocchetti TT, Lima SL, Yu MCZ, da Matta DA et al. Candida species causing fungal keratitis: molecular identification, antifungal susceptibility, biofilm formation, and clinical aspects. Braz J Microbiol 2023; 54:629–636 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. da Cunha Neto JF, da Silva Rocha WP, Makris G, Sandoval-Denis M, Hagen F et al. Fusarioid keratitis and other superficial infections: a 10-years prospective study from Northeastern Brazil. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2024; 18:e0012247 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. de Souza P de F, Milanez EPR, de Andrade ARC, Silva ML, Silva ML et al. Antifungal susceptibility, clinical findings, and biofilm resistance of Fusarium species causing keratitis: a challenge for disease control. Braz J Microbiol 2025; 56:341–352 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Sengupta J, Saha S, Banerjee D, Mandal S et al. A comparative analysis of antifungal susceptibility of keratitis associated fungal biofilm and planktonic cultures. Int J Adv Res 2017; 5:1248–1252 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Calvillo-Medina RP, Martínez-Neria M, Mena-Portales J, Barba-Escoto L, Raymundo T et al. Identification and biofilm development by a new fungal keratitis aetiologic agent. Mycoses 2019; 62:62–72 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Iñigo M, Del Pozo JL. Fungal biofilms: from bench to bedside. Rev Esp Quimioter 2018; 31 Suppl 1:35–38 [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Mukherjee PK, Chandra J, Yu C, Sun Y, Pearlman E et al. Characterization of Fusarium keratitis outbreak isolates: contribution of biofilms to antimicrobial resistance and pathogenesis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2012; 53:4450 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Wang D, Zeng N, Li C, Li Z, Zhang N et al. Fungal biofilm formation and its regulatory mechanism. Heliyon 2024; 10:e32766 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Córdova-Alcántara IM, Venegas-Cortés DL, Martínez-Rivera , Pérez NO, Rodriguez-Tovar AV. Biofilm characterization of Fusarium solani keratitis isolate: increased resistance to antifungals and UV light. J Microbiol 2019; 57:485–497 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Ramage G, Rajendran R, Sherry L, Williams C. Fungal biofilm resistance. Int J Microbiol 2012; 2012:528521 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Akinduti PA, George OW, Ohore HU, Ariyo OE, Popoola ST et al. Evaluation of efflux-mediated resistance and biofilm formation in virulent Pseudomonas aeruginosa Associated with Healthcare Infections. Antibiotics (Basel) 2023; 12:626 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Holmes AR, Cardno TS, Strouse JJ, Ivnitski-Steele I, Keniya MV et al. Targeting efflux pumps to overcome antifungal drug resistance. Future Med Chem 2016; 8:1485–1501 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Cordeiro RDA, Portela FVM, Pereira LMG, De Andrade ARC, De Sousa JK et al. Efflux pump inhibition controls growth and enhances antifungal susceptibility of Fusarium Solani species complex. Future Microbiol 2020; 15:9–20 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Mills B, Radhakrishnan N, Karthikeyan Rajapandian SG, Rameshkumar G, Lalitha P et al. The role of fungi in fungal keratitis. Exp Eye Res 2021; 202:108372 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Sitnova AV, Svetozarskiy SN. Modern technologies in diagnosis of fungal keratitis (Review). Sovrem Tekhnologii Med 2023; 15:73–84 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Fanning S, Mitchell AP. Fungal biofilms. PLoS Pathog 2012; 8:e1002585 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Sharma S, Singh S, Goel S, Farooq U. Role of Biofilms in Fungal Keratitis- An Overview. JBMOA 2017; 5:409–412 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Voinescu A, Licker M, Muntean D, Musuroi C, Musuroi SI et al. A comprehensive review of microbial biofilms on contact lenses: challenges and solutions. Infect Drug Resist 2024; 17:2659–2671 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Ranjith K, Nagapriya B, Shivaji S. Polymicrobial biofilms of ocular bacteria and fungi on ex vivo human corneas. Sci Rep 2022; 12:11606 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Shivaji S, Nagapriya B, Ranjith K. Differential susceptibility of mixed polymicrobial biofilms involving ocular coccoid bacteria (Staphylococcus aureus and S. epidermidis) and a filamentous fungus (Fusarium solani) on Ex vivo human corneas. Microorganisms 2023; 11:413 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Ratitong B, Pearlman E. Pathogenic Aspergillus and Fusarium as important causes of blinding corneal infections - the role of neutrophils in fungal killing, tissue damage and cytokine production. Curr Opin Microbiol 2021; 63:195–203 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.002106
Loading
/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.002106
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error