Skip to content
1887

Abstract

https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.002043

has been considered one of the predominant microbes in the gut microbiota of healthy human adults. Moreover, due to its beneficial metabolites and its reduced population in patients with various disorders, this organism has been regarded as one of the key gut microbes in human health. However, following recent revisions in the taxonomy of the genus and , the reported population distribution and health benefits of this species have become unclear. In the present study, the population of nine species-level taxonomic groups (hereafter referred to as species) within was quantified at the species level in the faeces of healthy Japanese adults (=88). qPCR, combined with -based species-specific primers, showed that had the highest detection rate (prevalence) and copy number among spp., followed by , and , while the remaining five species were detected only occasionally. The population of varied significantly between age groups, being higher in individuals in their 40s and 50s compared to those in their 20s (=0.047 and 0.002, respectively). The present study indicates that is not the predominant species in the healthy Japanese adults included in the present study. Future studies will shed light on the health benefits of the dominant spp.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (Award 24K08691)
    • Principal Award Recipient: AkihitoEndo
  • This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. This article was made open access via a Publish and Read agreement between the Microbiology Society and the corresponding author’s institution.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.002019
2025-05-23
2026-04-15

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jmm/74/5/jmm002019.html?itemId=/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.002019&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Lopez-Siles M, Duncan SH, Garcia-Gil LJ, Martinez-Medina M. Faecalibacterium prausnitzii: from microbiology to diagnostics and prognostics. ISME J 2017; 11:841–852 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Kinoshita M, Suzuki Y, Saito Y. Butyrate reduces colonic paracellular permeability by enhancing PPARgamma activation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2002; 293:827–831 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Furusawa Y, Obata Y, Fukuda S, Endo TA, Nakato G et al. Commensal microbe-derived butyrate induces the differentiation of colonic regulatory T cells. Nature 2013; 504:446–450 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Zhang X, Shen D, Fang Z, Jie Z, Qiu X et al. Human gut microbiota changes reveal the progression of glucose intolerance. PLoS One 2013; 8:e71108 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Ueda A, Shinkai S, Shiroma H, Taniguchi Y, Tsuchida S et al. Identification of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii strains for gut microbiome-based intervention in Alzheimer’s-type dementia. Cell Rep Med 2021; 2:100398 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Demirci M, Tokman HB, Uysal HK, Demiryas S, Karakullukcu A et al. Reduced Akkermansia muciniphila and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii levels in the gut microbiota of children with allergic asthma. Allergol Immunopathol 2019; 47:365–371 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Sokol H, Pigneur B, Watterlot L, Lakhdari O, Bermúdez-Humarán LG et al. Faecalibacterium prausnitzii is an anti-inflammatory commensal bacterium identified by gut microbiota analysis of Crohn disease patients. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008; 105:16731–16736 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Sokol H, Seksik P, Furet JP, Firmesse O, Nion-Larmurier I et al. Low counts of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii in colitis microbiota. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2009; 15:1183–1189 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Langella P, Guarner F, Martín R. Editorial: next-generation probiotics: from commensal bacteria to novel drugs and food supplements. Front Microbiol 2019; 10:1973 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Duncan SH, Hold GL, Harmsen HJM, Stewart CS, Flint HJ. Growth requirements and fermentation products of Fusobacterium prausnitzii, and a proposal to reclassify it as Faecalibacterium prausnitzii gen. nov., comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2002; 52:2141–2146 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Lopez-Siles M, Khan TM, Duncan SH, Harmsen HJM, Garcia-Gil LJ et al. Cultured representatives of two major phylogroups of human colonic Faecalibacterium prausnitzii can utilize pectin, uronic acids, and host-derived substrates for growth. Appl Environ Microbiol 2012; 78:420–428 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Benevides L, Burman S, Martin R, Robert V, Thomas M et al. New insights into the diversity of the genus Faecalibacterium. Front Microbiol 2017; 8:1790 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Fitzgerald CB, Shkoporov AN, Sutton TDS, Chaplin AV, Velayudhan V et al. Comparative analysis of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii genomes shows a high level of genome plasticity and warrants separation into new species-level taxa. BMC Genom 2018; 19:931 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Tanno H, Maeno S, Salminen S, Gueimonde M, Endo A. 16S rRNA gene sequence diversity in Faecalibacterium prausnitzii-complex taxa has marked impacts on quantitative analysis. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 2022; 98:fiac004 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Tanno H, Chatel J-M, Martin R, Mariat D, Sakamoto M et al. New gene markers for classification and quantification of Faecalibacterium spp. in the human gut. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 2023; 99:fiad035 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Sakamoto M, Sakurai N, Tanno H, Iino T, Ohkuma M et al. Genome-based, phenotypic and chemotaxonomic classification of Faecalibacterium strains: proposal of three novel species Faecalibacterium duncaniae sp. nov., Faecalibacterium hattorii sp. nov. and Faecalibacterium gallinarum sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2022; 72: [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Zou Y, Lin X, Xue W, Tuo L, Chen M-S et al. Characterization and description of Faecalibacterium butyricigenerans sp. nov. and F. longum sp. nov., isolated from human faeces. Sci Rep 2021; 11:11340 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Liou J-S, Zhang W-L, Hsu L-W, Chen C-C, Wang Y-T et al. Faecalibacterium taiwanense sp. nov., isolated from human faeces. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2024; 74:006413 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Miyazawa K, Harata G, Yoda K, Yamazaki K, He F et al. Effects of intake of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG on intestinal environment and skin condition in healthy adults: a rondomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Int J Probiotics Prebiotics 2018; 13:11–18
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Bliss DZ, Savik K, Jung H, Jensen L, LeMoine M et al. Comparison of subjective classification of stool consistency and stool water content. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 1999; 26:137–141 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Oren A, Göker M. Validation List no. 221: valid publication of new names and new combinations effectively published outside the IJSEM. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2025; 75: [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Bartosch S, Fite A, Macfarlane GT, McMurdo MET. Characterization of bacterial communities in feces from healthy elderly volunteers and hospitalized elderly patients by using real-time PCR and effects of antibiotic treatment on the fecal microbiota. Appl Environ Microbiol 2004; 70:3575–3581 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. De Filippis F, Pasolli E, Ercolini D. Newly explored Faecalibacterium diversity is connected to age, lifestyle, geography, and disease. Curr Biol 2020; 30:4932–4943 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Arumugam M, Raes J, Pelletier E, Le Paslier D, Yamada T et al. Enterotypes of the human gut microbiome. Nature 2011; 473:174–180 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Varela E, Manichanh C, Gallart M, Torrejón A, Borruel N et al. Colonisation by Faecalibacterium prausnitzii and maintenance of clinical remission in patients with ulcerative colitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2013; 38:151–161 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Quévrain E, Maubert MA, Michon C, Chain F, Marquant R et al. Identification of an anti-inflammatory protein from Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, a commensal bacterium deficient in Crohn’s disease. Gut 2016; 65:415–425 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Chollet L, Heumel S, Deruyter L, Bouilloux F, Delval L et al. Faecalibacterium duncaniae as a novel next generation probiotic against influenza. Front Immunol 2024; 15:1347676 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.002019
Loading
/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.002019
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error