Skip to content
1887

Journal of Medical Microbiology logo Journal of Medical Microbiology

Volume 74, Issue 4

Comparative genomic analysis of paired clinical isolates from a patient with recurrent melioidosis reveals a low within-host mutation rate Open Access

Abstract

Relapse of melioidosis is not uncommon and can occur due to shorter oral antibiotic therapy in the first episode. In such isolates, low mutation rates were identified amongst paired clinical isolates during relapse, but large-scale structural variants were also common.

Using pair-wise comparison, a low number of mutations, especially amongst the virulence and antibiotic resistance genes, may be present amongst the paired isolates obtained during the study period.

A pair of clinical isolates obtained from a patient with recurrent melioidosis during the study period (January 2018 to June 2021) was analysed for identifying the genomic relatedness and DNA changes that may have caused the relapse.

Using paired-end Illumina sequencing, following appropriate data quality checks, the genomes were assembled using Shovill pipeline, whilst the variants were called using Snippy. Structural variants were detected using TIDDIT, and functional associations were identified using the STRING database searches.

One of the isolates (from the second episode) had a highly fragmented genome, but very few structural variants and SNPs were identified. Both the isolates had similar virulence and antibiotic resistance genes; however, owing to the few structural changes, a slightly lower number of virulence genes were observed. Together, they shared 99.8% of the proteomes, and most variants identified spanned either hypothetical proteins or un-annotated regions.

Based on comprehensive genome analysis the two strains were genetically similar, with a few structural variants, implying the second episode to be a relapse rather than a re-infection. There was no difference in the antibiotic resistance or virulence genes that may have explained the relapse.

  • Received:
  • Accepted:
  • Published Online:
Keyword(s): Burkholderia pseudomallei , genome sequencing , melioidosis and relapse
Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Indian Council of Medical Research (Award OMI-FELLOWSHIP/3/2020-ECD-I)
    • Principle Award Recipient: SreeramChandra Murthy Peela
  • Jawaharlal Institute Of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (Award JIP/RES/INTRAMURAL/PHS1/2018-19)
    • Principle Award Recipient: SujathaSistla
© 2025 The Authors
  • This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.002003
2025-04-15
2025-04-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jmm/74/4/jmm002003.html?itemId=/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.002003&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Chapple SNJ, Sarovich DS, Holden MTG, Peacock SJ, Buller N et al. Whole-genome sequencing of a quarter-century melioidosis outbreak in temperate Australia uncovers a region of low-prevalence endemicity. Microb Genom 2016; 2:e000067 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Gassiep I, Armstrong M, Norton R. Human melioidosis. Clin Microbiol Rev 2020; 33:e00006-19 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Holden MTG, Titball RW, Peacock SJ, Cerdeño-Tárraga AM, Atkins T et al. Genomic plasticity of the causative agent of melioidosis, Burkholderia pseudomallei. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004; 101:14240–14245 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Raj S, Sistla S, Sadanandan DM, Kadhiravan T, Rameesh BMS et al. Clinical profile and predictors of mortality among patients with melioidosis. J Glob Infect Dis 2023; 15:72–78 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Hayden HS, Lim R, Brittnacher MJ, Sims EH, Ramage ER et al. Evolution of Burkholderia pseudomallei in recurrent melioidosis. PLoS One 2012; 7:e36507 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Seng R, Phunpang R, Saiprom N, Dulsuk A, Chewapreecha C et al. Phenotypic and genetic alterations of Burkholderia pseudomallei in patients during relapse and persistent infections. Front Microbiol 2023; 14:1103297 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Seemann T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinforma Oxf Engl 2014; 30:2068–2069 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Jolley KA, Maiden MC. BIGSdb: scalable analysis of bacterial genome variation at the population level. BMC Bioinform 2010; 11:595 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Chen L, Zheng D, Liu B, Yang J, Jin Q. VFDB 2016: hierarchical and refined dataset for big data analysis--10 years on. Nucleic Acids Res 2016; 44:D694–7 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Feldgarden M, Brover V, Haft DH, Prasad AB, Slotta DJ et al. Validating the AMRfinder tool and resistance gene database by using antimicrobial resistance genotype-phenotype correlations in a collection of isolates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2019; 63:e00483-19 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Ondov BD, Treangen TJ, Melsted P, Mallonee AB, Bergman NH et al. Mash: fast genome and metagenome distance estimation using MinHash. Genome Biol 2016; 17:132 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Alikhan N-F, Petty NK, Ben Zakour NL, Beatson SA. BLAST Ring Image Generator (BRIG): simple prokaryote genome comparisons. BMC Genom 2011; 12:402 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Sun J, Lu F, Luo Y, Bie L, Xu L et al. OrthoVenn3: an integrated platform for exploring and visualizing orthologous data across genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 2023; 51:W397–W403 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Eisfeldt J, Vezzi F, Olason P, Nilsson D, Lindstrand A. TIDDIT, an efficient and comprehensive structural variant caller for massive parallel sequencing data. F1000Res 2017; 6:664 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Chowdhury S, Barai L, Afroze SR, Ghosh PK, Afroz F et al. The epidemiology of melioidosis and its association with diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pathogens 2022; 11:149 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Sarovich DS, Ward L, Price EP, Mayo M, Pitman MC et al. Recurrent melioidosis in the darwin prospective melioidosis study: improving therapies mean that relapse cases are now rare. J Clin Microbiol 2014; 52:650–653 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Halim I, Shaw T, Tellapragada C, Vandana KE, Mukhopadhyay C. Melioidosis: reinfection going incognito as relapse. Indian J Med Microbiol 2017; 35:593–596 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Limmathurotsakul D, Chaowagul W, Chantratita N, Wuthiekanun V, Biaklang M et al. A simple scoring system to differentiate between relapse and re-infection in patients with recurrent melioidosis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2008; 2:e327 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Gan Y-H. Interaction between Burkholderia pseudomallei and the host immune response: sleeping with the enemy?. J Infect Dis 2005; 192:1845–1850 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Vadivelu J, Vellasamy KM, Thimma J, Mariappan V, Kang W-T et al. Survival and intra-nuclear trafficking of Burkholderia pseudomallei: strategies of evasion from immune surveillance?. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2017; 11:e0005241 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Limmathurotsakul D, Chaowagul W, Chierakul W, Stepniewska K, Maharjan B et al. Risk factors for recurrent melioidosis in northeast Thailand. Clin Infect Dis 2006; 43:979–986 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Cheng AC, Currie BJ. Melioidosis: epidemiology, pathophysiology, and management. Clin Microbiol Rev 2005; 18:383–416 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Aziz A, Sarovich DS, Harris TM, Kaestli M, McRobb E et al. Suspected cases of intracontinental Burkholderia pseudomallei sequence type homoplasy resolved using whole-genome sequencing. Microb Genom 2017; 3:e000139 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Jayasinghearachchi HS, Corea EM, Krishnananthasivam S, Sathkumara HD, Francis VR et al. Whole-genome sequences of eight clinical isolates of Burkholderia pseudomallei from melioidosis patients in eastern Sri Lanka. Microbiol Resour Announc 2019; 8:e00645-19 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Sarovich DS, Chapple SNJ, Price EP, Mayo M, Holden MTG et al. Whole-genome sequencing to investigate a non-clonal melioidosis cluster on a remote Australian island. Microb Genom 2017; 3:e000117 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Amladi A, Devanga Ragupathi NK, Vasudevan K, Venkatesan M, Anandan S et al. First report of Burkholderia pseudomallei ST412 and ST734 clones harbouring blaOXA-57 but susceptible to imipenem in India. New Microbes New Infect 2019; 32:100613 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Mukhopadhyay C, Shaw T, Varghese GM, Dance DAB. Melioidosis in South Asia (India, Nepal, Pakistan, Bhutan and Afghanistan). Trop Med Infect Dis 2018; 3:51 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Tellapragada C, Kamthan A, Shaw T, Ke V, Kumar S et al. Unravelling the molecular epidemiology and genetic diversity among Burkholderia pseudomallei isolates from South India using multi-locus sequence typing. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0168331 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Mukhopadhyay C, Kaestli M, Vandana KE, Sushma K, Mayo M et al. Molecular characterization of clinical Burkholderia pseudomallei isolates from India. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2011; 85:121–123 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Kamthan A, Shaw T, Mukhopadhyay C, Kumar S. Molecular analysis of clinical Burkholderia pseudomallei isolates from southwestern coastal region of India, using multi-locus sequence typing. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2018; 12:e0006915 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Balaji V, Perumalla S, Perumal R, Inbanathan FY, Rajamani Sekar SK et al. Multi locus sequence typing of Burkholderia pseudomallei isolates from India unveils molecular diversity and confers regional association in Southeast Asia. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2018; 12:e0006558 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Panya M, Thirat S, Wanram S, Panomket P, Nilsakul J. Prevalence of bla(pena) and bla(OXA) in burkholderia pseudomallei isolated from patients at sappasitthiprasong hospital and their susceptibility to ceftazidime and carbapenems. J Med Assoc Thail Chotmaihet Thangphaet 2016; 99:S12–S16
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Limmathurotsakul D, Paeyao A, Wongratanacheewin S, Saiprom N, Takpho N et al. Role of Burkholderia pseudomallei biofilm formation and lipopolysaccharide in relapse of melioidosis. Clin Microbiol Infect 2014; 20:O854–6 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Anuntagool N, Wuthiekanun V, White NJ, Currie BJ, Sermswan RW et al. Lipopolysaccharide heterogeneity among Burkholderia pseudomallei from different geographic and clinical origins. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2006; 74:348–352 [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Nikolakakis K, Amber S, Wilbur JS, Diner EJ, Aoki SK et al. The toxin/immunity network of Burkholderia pseudomallei contact-dependent growth inhibition (CDI) systems. Mol Microbiol 2012; 84:516–529 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Wallner A, Moulin L, Busset N, Rimbault I, Béna G. Genetic diversity of type 3 secretion system in Burkholderia s.l. and links with plant host adaptation. Front Microbiol 2021; 12:761215 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Jank T, Aktories K. Structure and mode of action of clostridial glucosylating toxins: the ABCD model. Trends Microbiol 2008; 16:222–229 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Walpole GFW, Plumb JD, Chung D, Tang B, Boulay B et al. Inactivation of rho GTPases by Burkholderia cenocepacia induces a WASH-mediated actin polymerization that delays phagosome maturation. Cell Rep 2020; 31:107721 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.002003
Loading
Comparative genomic analysis of paired clinical isolates from a patient with recurrent melioidosis reveals a low within-host mutation rate
J. Med. Microbiol. 74, 002003 (2025); https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.002003
/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.002003
/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.002003
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

EXCEL

Supplementary material 2

PDF

Most cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error