Skip to content
1887

Abstract

is a sexually transmitted bacterium associated with non-gonococcal urethritis (NGU) in men. The rising macrolide and fluoroquinolone resistance in has become a public health concern, requiring close surveillance.

typing is commonly used to study genotype distribution and resistance patterns of in men who have sex with men (MSM); however, data for men who have sex with women (MSW) are limited.

The aim of this study was to explore the epidemiology of based on / molecular typing in isolates from men diagnosed with NGU, comparing MSM and MSW. Additionally, antibiotic resistance was evaluated to assess associations between the genotypes, antimicrobial resistance profiles, and epidemiological determinants.

A subset of previously collected isolates from men diagnosed with NGU in Amsterdam, the Netherlands, between May 2018 and November 2019 was analysed. Molecular typing was performed by sequencing relevant regions of the and loci. Macrolide resistance was assessed by detecting mutations in the 23S rRNA gene via quantitative polymerase chain reaction, while fluoroquinolone resistance was determined through sequencing and .

A total of 62 . samples were analysed from 33 MSM and 29 MSW. The overall macrolide and fluoroquinolone resistance was 75.8% and 24.2 %, respectively. At the locus, 24 sequence types (STs) were identified, with ST4 most prevalent in MSM and ST2 in MSW. The locus revealed 12 distinct short tandem repeat numbers, with repeat 10 being most common in both groups. Phylogenetic analysis based on sequences revealed two clusters: cluster A included significantly more MSW, whereas cluster B predominantly comprised MSM (<0.001). Macrolide and fluoroquinolone resistance was significantly higher in cluster B compared with cluster A (<0.01 and <0.05, respectively).

Molecular typing of revealed two clusters that differed by sexual preference and antibiotic resistance, highlighting the importance of surveillance of resistance across genotypes. The findings suggest multiclonal spread of resistance through independent mutations. Future studies using next-generation sequencing are needed to further explore the links between sexual transmission and genetic diversity in .

  • This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.001999
2025-04-25
2025-05-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jmm/74/4/jmm001999.html?itemId=/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.001999&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Gnanadurai R, Fifer H. Mycoplasma genitalium: a review. Microbiology 2020; 166:21–29 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Taylor-Robinson D, Jensen JS. Mycoplasma genitalium: from chrysalis to multicolored butterfly. Clin Microbiol Rev 2011; 24:498–514 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bradshaw CS, Tabrizi SN, Read TRH, Garland SM, Hopkins CA et al. Etiologies of nongonococcal urethritis: bacteria, viruses, and the association with orogenital exposure. J Infect Dis 2006; 193:336–345 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Jensen JS, Cusini M, Gomberg M, Moi H, Wilson J et al. 2021 European guideline on the management of Mycoplasma genitalium infections. Acad Dermatol Venereol 2022; 36:641–650 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Jensen JS, Unemo M. Antimicrobial treatment and resistance in sexually transmitted bacterial infections. Nat Rev Microbiol 2024; 22:435–450 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Jensen JS, Bradshaw CS, Tabrizi SN, Fairley CK, Hamasuna R. Azithromycin treatment failure in Mycoplasma genitalium-positive patients with nongonococcal urethritis is associated with induced macrolide resistance. Clin Infect Dis 2008; 47:1546–1553 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Hjorth SV, Björnelius E, Lidbrink P, Falk L, Dohn B et al. Sequence-based typing of Mycoplasma genitalium reveals sexual transmission. J Clin Microbiol 2006; 44:2078–2083 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Ma L, Martin DH. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the rRNA operon and variable numbers of tandem repeats in the lipoprotein gene among Mycoplasma genitalium strains from clinical specimens. J Clin Microbiol 2004; 42:4876–4878 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Ma L, Taylor S, Jensen JS, Myers L, Lillis R et al. Short tandem repeat sequences in the Mycoplasma genitalium genome and their use in a multilocus genotyping system. BMC Microbiol 2008; 8:130 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Dumke R. Molecular tools for typing Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Mycoplasma genitalium. Front Microbiol 2022; 13:904494 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Guiraud J, Helary M, Le Roy C, Elguero E, Pereyre S et al. Molecular typing reveals distinct Mycoplasma genitalium transmission networks among a cohort of men who have sex with men and a cohort of women in France. Microorganisms 2022; 10:1587 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Dumke R, Rust M, Glaunsinger T. mgpB types among Mycoplasma genitalium strains from men who have sex with men in Berlin, Germany, 2016–2018. Pathogens 2020; 9:12 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Braam JF, van Dam AP, Bruisten SM, van Rooijen MS, de Vries HJC et al. Macrolide-resistant Mycoplasma genitalium impairs clinical improvement of male urethritis after empirical treatment. Sex Transm Dis 2022; 49:360–367 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Jensen JS, Björnelius E, Dohn B, Lidbrink P. Use of TaqMan 5’ nuclease real-time PCR for quantitative detection of Mycoplasma genitalium DNA in males with and without urethritis who were attendees at a sexually transmitted disease clinic. J Clin Microbiol 2004; 42:683–692 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Braam JF, Hetem DJ, Vergunst CE, Kuizenga Wessel S, van Rooijen MS et al. Evaluating the prevalence and risk factors for macrolide resistance in Mycoplasma genitalium using a newly developed qPCR assay. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0240836 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Deguchi T, Maeda S, Tamaki M, Yoshida T, Ishiko H et al. Analysis of the gyrA and parC genes of Mycoplasma genitalium detected in first-pass urine of men with non-gonococcal urethritis before and after fluoroquinolone treatment. J Antimicrob Chemother 2001; 48:742–744 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Jensen JS, Uldum SA, Søndergård-Andersen J, Vuust J, Lind K. Polymerase chain reaction for detection of Mycoplasma genitalium in clinical samples. J Clin Microbiol 1991; 29:46–50 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Guiraud J, Lounnas M, Boissière A, Le Roy C, Elguero E et al. Lower mgpB diversity in macrolide-resistant Mycoplasma genitalium infecting men visiting two sexually transmitted infection clinics in Montpellier, France. J Antimicrob Chemother 2021; 76:43–47 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Jolley K, Bray J, Maiden M. Open-access bacterial population genomics: BIGSdb software, the PubMLST.org website and their applications. Wellcome Open Res 2018; 3:124 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Hunter PR, Gaston MA. Numerical index of the discriminatory ability of typing systems: an application of simpson’s index of diversity. J Clin Microbiol 1988; 26:2465–2466 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Fernández-Huerta M, Serra-Pladevall J, Esperalba J, Moreno-Mingorance A, Fernández-Naval C et al. Single-locus-sequence-based typing of the mgpB gene reveals transmission dynamics in Mycoplasma genitalium. J Clin Microbiol 2020; 58:58 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Fookes MC, Hadfield J, Harris S, Parmar S, Unemo M et al. Mycoplasma genitalium: whole genome sequence analysis, recombination and population structure. BMC Genomics 2017; 18:993 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Machalek DA, Tao Y, Shilling H, Jensen JS, Unemo M et al. Prevalence of mutations associated with resistance to macrolides and fluoroquinolones in Mycoplasma genitalium: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis 2020; 20:1302–1314 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Piñeiro L, Idigoras P, Cilla G. Molecular typing of Mycoplasma genitalium-positive specimens discriminates between persistent and recurrent infections in cases of treatment failure and supports contact tracing. Microorganisms 2019; 7: [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Kenyon C, De Baetselier I, Vanbaelen T, Buyze J, Florence E. The population-level effect of screening for Mycoplasma genitalium on antimicrobial resistance: a quasi-experimental study. Sex Transm Dis 2021; 48:629–634 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Read TRH, Fairley CK, Murray GL, Jensen JS, Danielewski J et al. Outcomes of resistance-guided sequential treatment of Mycoplasma genitalium infections: a prospective evaluation. Clin Infect Dis 2019; 68:554–560 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Soni S, Horner P, Rayment M, Pinto-Sander N, Naous N et al. British association for sexual health and HIV national guideline for the management of infection with Mycoplasma genitalium (2018). Int J STD AIDS 2019; 30:938–950 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. ASHM 2024 Australian STI management guidelines for use in primary care Mycoplasma genitalium https://sti.guidelines.org.au/sexually-transmissible-infections/mycoplasma-genitalium/
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Dumke R, Spornraft-Ragaller P. Antibiotic resistance and genotypes of Mycoplasma genitalium during a resistance-guided treatment regime in a German University Hospital. Antibiotics 2021; 10:962 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Anagrius C, Loré B, Jensen JS. Treatment of Mycoplasma genitalium. Observations from a Swedish STD clinic. PLoS One 2013; 8:e61481 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.001999
Loading
/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.001999
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error