Skip to content
1887

Abstract

clade B has recently been re-classified as . Although was previously associated with food products and probiotics, the recent re-classification has prompted the need for the accurate identification of this species and re-interpretation of its disease-causing ability. Since the re-classified can currently only be identified by molecular techniques such as whole-genome sequencing, we constructed a MALDI Biotyper custom database to rapidly identify and differentiate causing bacteraemia from .

The re-classification of clade B as warrants the development of rapid and accurate identification methods to distinguish these species, particularly in clinical settings where may be misidentified as .

The aim of this study was to construct a MALDI Biotyper custom database to rapidly identify and differentiate causing bacteraemia from .

A total of 97 enterococcal isolates, including 38 , 51 and 8 non- non- enterococci (, , , , , , , , and ) were investigated. Whole-genome sequence analysis was used to confirm the species of each isolate. A MALDI Biotyper in-house database was constructed using 29 isolates and the ethanol/formic acid/acetonitrile preparation protocol. The in-house database was validated using the 97 enterococcal isolates and the extended direct transfer preparation protocol.

Our in-house database correctly identified all isolates at the species level, including the isolates, all of which were misidentified as by the BioTyper MBT Compass reference library (2022). Of the 38 isolates, 84.2% (=32) were identified at the high probable species level (score ≥2.300), while the remaining 15.8% (=6) were identified at the probable species level (score 2.000–2.299). Similarly, all isolates (=51) were accurately identified, including 84.3% (=43/51) identified at the high probable species level and 15.7% (=8/51) identified at the probable species level.

Our study provides a ready-to-use custom MALDI spectral database that can be implemented in clinical diagnostic and research laboratories to accurately identify which is currently misidentified as by the standard spectrum database available on commercial platforms.

  • This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. This article was made open access via a Publish and Read agreement between the Microbiology Society and the corresponding author’s institution.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.001995
2025-04-04
2025-04-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jmm/74/4/jmm001995.html?itemId=/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.001995&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Boucher HW, Talbot GH, Bradley JS, Edwards JE, Gilbert D et al. Bad bugs, no drugs: no ESKAPE! An update from the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 2009; 48:1–12 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. World Health Organization WHO bacterial priority pathogens list, 2024: Bacterial pathogens of public health importance to guide research, development and strategies to prevent and control antimicrobial resistance. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2024 https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240093461 accessed 27 November 2024
  3. Eisenberger D, Tuschak C, Werner M, Bogdan C, Bollinger T et al. Whole-genome analysis of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium causing nosocomial outbreaks suggests the occurrence of few endemic clonal lineages in Bavaria, Germany. J Antimicrob Chemother 2020; 75:1398–1404 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Belloso Daza MV, Cortimiglia C, Bassi D, Cocconcelli PS. Genome-based studies indicate that the Enterococcus faecium Clade B strains belong to Enterococcus lactis species and lack of the hospital infection associated markers. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2021; 71: [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Lebreton F, van Schaik W, McGuire AM, Godfrey P, Griggs A et al. Emergence of epidemic multidrug-resistant Enterococcus faecium from animal and commensal strains. mBio 2013; 4:e00534-13 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Morandi S, Cremonesi P, Povolo M, Brasca M. Enterococcus lactis sp. nov., from Italian raw milk cheeses. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2012; 62:1992–1996 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Sharma A, Lavania M, Singh R, Lal B. Identification and probiotic potential of lactic acid bacteria from camel milk. Saudi J Biol Sci 2021; 28:1622–1632 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Sharma S, Chaturvedi J, Chaudhari BP, Singh RL, Kakkar P. Probiotic Enterococcus lactis IITRHR1 protects against acetaminophen-induced hepatotoxicity. Nutrition 2012; 28:173–181 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Nami Y, Haghshenas B, Haghshenas M, Abdullah N, Yari Khosroushahi A. The prophylactic effect of probiotic Enterococcus lactis IW5 against different human cancer cells. Front Microbiol 2015; 6:1317 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Boyaci Gunduz CP, Gaglio R, Franciosi E, Settanni L, Erten H. Molecular analysis of the dominant lactic acid bacteria of chickpea liquid starters and doughs and propagation of chickpea sourdoughs with selected Weissella confusa. Food Microbiol 2020; 91:103490 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Ohkusu K. Enterococcus faecium 129 BIO 3B is classified as Enterococcus lactis 129 BIO 3B. Biosci Microbiota Food Health; 2023
  12. Bampidis V, Azimonti G, Bastos M de L, Christensen H, Durjava M et al. Assessment of the feed additive consisting of Enterococcus lactis DSM 7134 and Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus DSM 7133 (Provita LE) for calves for rearing for the renewal of its authorisation (Lactosan GmbH & Co.KG). EFSA J 2023; 21:e08350 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Coombs GW, Daley DA, Shoby P. Australian enterococcal surveillance outcome program (AESOP) bloodstream infection annual report 2022. Commun Dis Intell 2023 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Koutsoumanis K, Allende A, Alvarez-Ordóñez A, Bolton D et al. Update of the list of QPS-recommended biological agents intentionally added to food or feed as notified to EFSA 15: suitability of taxonomic units notified to EFSA until September 2021. EFSA J 2022; 20:e07045 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Shan X, Yang M, Wang N, Schwarz S, Li D et al. Plasmid fusion and recombination events that occurred during conjugation of poxtA-carrying plasmids in enterococci. Microbiol Spectr 2022; 10:e0150521 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Coombs GW, Daley DA, Shoby P. Australian enterococcal sepsis outcome program (AESOP) annual report 2021. Commun Dis Intell 2022 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Kim E, Yang SM, Kim HJ, Kim HY. Differentiating between Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus lactis by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Foods 2022; 11:1046 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Oviaño M, Rodríguez-Sánchez B. MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry in the 21st century clinical microbiology laboratory. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin (Engl Ed) 2021; 39:192–200 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M et al. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 2012; 19:455–477 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Homan WL, Tribe D, Poznanski S, Li M, Hogg G et al. Multilocus sequence typing scheme for Enterococcus faecium. J Clin Microbiol 2002; 40:1963–1971 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Jolley KA, Bliss CM, Bennett JS, Bratcher HB, Brehony C et al. Ribosomal multilocus sequence typing: universal characterization of bacteria from domain to strain. Microbiology (Reading) 2012; 158:1005–1015 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Seemann T. Snippy: fast bacterial variant calling from NGS reads; 2015 https://github.com/tseemann/snippy accessed 6 August 2024
  23. Letunic I, Bork P. Interactive tree of life (iTOL) v3: an online tool for the display and annotation of phylogenetic and other trees. Nucleic Acids Res 2016; 44:W242–5 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Patel R. Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry in clinical microbiology. Clin Infect Dis 2013; 57:564–572 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Sauer S, Freiwald A, Maier T, Kube M, Reinhardt R et al. Classification and identification of bacteria by mass spectrometry and computational analysis. PLoS One 2008; 3:e2843 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Monaghan TF, Rahman SN, Agudelo CW, Wein AJ, Lazar JM et al. Foundational statistical principles in medical research: sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value. Medicina 2021; 57:503 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Pietta E, Montealegre MC, Roh JH, Cocconcelli PS, Murray BE. Enterococcus faecium PBP5-S/R, the missing link between PBP5-S and PBP5-R. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2014 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Lu J, Shen T, Zhang Y, Ma X, Xu S et al. Safety assessment of Enterococcus lactis based on comparative genomics and phenotypic analysis. Front Microbiol 2023; 14: [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Coombs GW, Daley DA, Yee NWT, Mowlaboccus S. Australian Group on Antimicrobial Resistance (AGAR) Australian Enterococcal Sepsis Outcome Programme (AESOP) Annual Report 2020. Commun Dis Intell (2018) 2022; 46: [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Hou TY, Chiang-Ni C, Teng SH. Current status of MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry in clinical microbiology. J Food Drug Anal 2019; 27:404–414 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Cuénod A, Foucault F, Pflüger V, Egli A. Factors associated with MALDI-TOF mass spectral quality of species identification in clinical routine diagnostics. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2021; 11:646648 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Veloo ACM, Elgersma PE, Friedrich AW, Nagy E, van Winkelhoff AJ. The influence of incubation time, sample preparation and exposure to oxygen on the quality of the MALDI-TOF MS spectrum of anaerobic bacteria. Clin Microbiol Infect 2014; 20:O1091–7 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.001995
Loading
/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.001995
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error