Skip to content
1887

Abstract

biofilms are one of the major causes of bloodstream infections related to the use of medical devices. The diagnosis of these infections is challenging, delaying their treatment and resulting in increased morbidity and mortality rates. As such, it is urgent to characterize the mechanisms employed by this bacterium to endure antibiotic treatments and the response of the host immune system, to develop more effective therapeutic strategies. In several bacterial species, the gene was shown to encode a protein that regulates the expression of genes involved in biofilm formation and immune evasion. Additionally, in a previous study, our group generated evidence indicating that is involved in the emergence of viable but non-culturable (VBNC) cells in .

As such, we hypothesized that the gene codY has have an important role in this bacterium virulence.

This study aimed to assess, for the first time, the impact of the deletion of the gene in virulence, namely, in antibiotic susceptibility, biofilm formation, VBNC state emergence and host immune system response.

Using an allelic replacement strategy, we constructed and then characterized an strain lacking in regards to biofilm and VBNC cell formation, susceptibility to antibiotics as well as their role in the interaction with human blood and plasma. Additionally, we investigate whether the gene can impact the activation of innate immune cells by evaluating the production of both pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines by THP-1 macrophages.

We demonstrated that the deletion of the gene resulted in biofilms with less c.f.u. counts and fewer VBNC cells. Furthermore, we show that although WT and mutant cells were similarly internalized by human macrophages, a stronger cytokine response was elicited by the mutant in a toll-like receptor 4-dependent manner.

Our results indicate that contributes to virulence, which in turn may have an impact on our ability to manage the biofilm-associated infections caused by this bacterium.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (Award UIDB/04469/2020)
    • Principle Award Recipient: NotApplicable
  • Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (Award POCI-01-0145-FEDER-029553)
    • Principle Award Recipient: NotApplicable
  • Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (Award PTDC/BIA-MOL/29553/2017)
    • Principle Award Recipient: NotApplicable
  • Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (Award DL57/2016/CP1377/CT0032)
    • Principle Award Recipient: AngelaFrança
  • Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (Award SFRH/BD/136998/2018 and COVID/BD/152917/2023)
    • Principle Award Recipient: NathalieLopes
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.001837
2024-05-14
2025-04-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Khatoon Z, McTiernan CD, Suuronen EJ, Mah TF, Alarcon EI. Bacterial biofilm formation on implantable devices and approaches to its treatment and prevention. Heliyon 2018; 4:1–36 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Cerca F, Andrade F, França Â, Andrade EB, Ribeiro A et al. Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms with higher proportions of dormant bacteria induce a lower activation of murine macrophages. J Med Microbiol 2011; 60:1717–1724 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Li L, Mendis N, Trigui H, Oliver JD, Faucher SP. The importance of the viable but non-culturable state in human bacterial pathogens. Front Microbiol 2014; 5:1–20 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Zhang S, Guo L, Yang K, Zhang Y, Ye C et al. Induction of Escherichia coli Into a VBNC state by continuous-flow UVC and subsequent changes in metabolic activity at the single-cell level. Front Microbiol 2018; 9:1–11 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Gu H, Hou S, Yongyat C, De Tore S, Ren D. Patterned biofilm formation reveals a mechanism for structural heterogeneity in bacterial biofilms. Langmuir 2013; 29:11145–11153 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Kranjec C, Angeles DM, Mårli MT, Fernández L, García P et al. Staphylococcal biofilms: challenges and novel therapeutic perspectives. Antibiotics (Basel) 2021; 10:1–30 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Cerca F, Trigo G, Correia A, Cerca N, Azeredo J et al. SYBR green as a fluorescent probe to evaluate the biofilm physiological state of Staphylococcus epidermidis, using flow cytometry. Can J Microbiol 2011; 57:850–856 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Carvalhais V, França A, Cerca F, Vitorino R, Pier GB et al. Dormancy within Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms: a transcriptomic analysis by RNA-seq. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2014; 98:1–12 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Carvalhais V, Cerveira F, Vilanova M, Cerca N, Vitorino R. An immunoproteomic approach for characterization of dormancy within Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms. Mol Immunol 2015; 65:429–435 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Tu Quoc PH, Genevaux P, Pajunen M, Savilahti H, Georgopoulos C et al. Isolation and characterization of biofilm formation-defective mutants of Staphylococcus aureus. Infect Immun 2007; 75:1079–1088 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Majerczyk CD, Sadykov MR, Luong TT, Lee C, Somerville GA et al. Staphylococcus aureus CodY negatively regulates virulence gene expression. J Bacteriol 2008; 190:2257–2265 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Frenzel E, Doll V, Pauthner M, Lücking G, Scherer S et al. CodY orchestrates the expression of virulence determinants in emetic Bacillus cereus by impacting key regulatory circuits. Mol Microbiol 2012; 85:67–88 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Pellegrini A, Lentini G, Famà A, Bonacorsi A, Scoffone VC et al. CodY is a global transcriptional regulator required for virulence in Group B Streptococcus. Front Microbiol 2022; 13:1–15 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Gaio V, Lopes N, Cerca N, França A. codY and pdhA expression is induced in Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm and planktonic populations with higher proportions of viable but non-culturable cells. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2021; 11:1–8 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Roux A, Todd DA, Velázquez JV, Cech NB, Sonenshein AL. CodY-mediated regulation of the Staphylococcus aureus Agr system integrates nutritional and population density signals. J Bacteriol 2014; 196:1184–1196 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Waters NR, Samuels DJ, Behera RK, Livny J, Rhee KY et al. A spectrum of CodY activities drives metabolic reorganization and virulence gene expression in Staphylococcus aureus. Mol Microbiol 2016; 101:495–514 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Pohl K, Francois P, Stenz L, Schlink F, Geiger T et al. CodY in Staphylococcus aureus: a regulatory link between metabolism and virulence gene expression. J Bacteriol 2009; 191:2953–2963 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Poudel S, Hefner Y, Szubin R, Sastry A, Gao Y et al. Coordination of CcpA and CodY regulators in Staphylococcus aureus USA300 strains. mSystems 2022; 7:1–13 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Gao Y, Poudel S, Seif Y, Shen Z, Palsson BO. Elucidating the Cody Regulon in Staphylococcus aureus USA300 Substrains. Am Soc Microbiol 20231–17
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Feng L, Zhu J, Chang H, Gao X, Gao C et al. The CodY regulator is essential for virulence in Streptococcus suis serotype 2. Sci Rep 2016; 6:1–15 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Lobel L, Sigal N, Borovok I, Belitsky BR, Sonenshein AL et al. The metabolic regulator CodY links Listeria monocytogenes metabolism to virulence by directly activating the virulence regulatory gene prfA. Mol Microbiol 2015; 95:624–644 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Freitas AI, Vasconcelos C, Vilanova M, Cerca N. Optimization of an automatic counting system for the quantification of Staphylococcus epidermidis cells in biofilms. J Basic Microbiol 2014; 54:750–757 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Monk IR, Shah IM, Xu M, Tan M-W, Foster TJ. Transforming the untransformable: application of direct transformation to manipulate genetically Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis. mBio 2012; 3:1–11 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Monk IR, Foster TJ. Genetic manipulation of Staphylococci-breaking through the barrier. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2012; 2:1–9 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Brückner R. A series of shuttle vectors for Bacillus subtilis and Escherichia coli. Gene 1992; 122:187–192 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. França A, Carvalhais V, Maira-Litrán T, Vilanova M, Cerca N et al. Alterations in the Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm transcriptome following interaction with whole human blood. Pathog Dis 2014; 70:444–448 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. França A, Cerca N. Plasma is the main regulator of Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms virulence genes transcription in human blood. Pathog Dis 2016; 74:1–5 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. França A, Pérez-Cabezas B, Correia A, Pier GB, Cerca N et al. Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm-released cells induce a prompt and more marked In vivo inflammatory-type response than planktonic or biofilm cells. Front Microbiol 2016; 7:1–12 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Brás S, França A. Transcriptome mining to identify molecular markers for the diagnosis of Staphylococcus epidermidis bloodstream infections. Antibiotics (Basel) 2022; 11:1596 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Cerca F, França Â, Pérez-Cabezas B, Carvalhais V, Ribeiro A et al. Dormant bacteria within Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms have low inflammatory properties and maintain tolerance to vancomycin and penicillin after entering planktonic growth. J Med Microbiol 2014; 63:1274–1283 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Chabi R, Momtaz H. Virulence factors and antibiotic resistance properties of the Staphylococcus epidermidis strains isolated from hospital infections in Ahvaz, Iran. Trop Med Health 2019; 47:1–9 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Hirayama D, Iida T, Nakase H. The Phagocytic Function of Macrophage-Enforcing Innate Immunity and Tissue Homeostasis. IJMS 2018; 19:92 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Strunk T, Power Coombs MR, Currie AJ, Richmond P, Golenbock DT et al. TLR2 mediates recognition of live Staphylococcus epidermidis and clearance of bacteremia. PLoS One 2010; 5:2–9 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. McDowell EJ, Callegari EA, Malke H, Chaussee MS. CodY-mediated regulation of Streptococcus pyogenes exoproteins. BMC Microbiol 2012; 12:1–8 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Hsueh YH, Somers EB, Wong ACL. Characterization of the codY gene and its influence on biofilm formation in Bacillus cereus. Arch Microbiol 2008; 189:557–568 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Lopes SP, Azevedo NF, Pereira MO. Quantitative assessment of individual populations within polymicrobial biofilms. Sci Rep 2018; 8:1–13 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Wi YM, Greenwood-Quaintance KE, Brinkman CL, Lee JYH, Howden BP et al. Rifampicin resistance in Staphylococcus epidermidis: molecular characterisation and fitness cost of rpoB mutations. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2018; 51:670–677 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Galac MR, Stam J, Maybank R, Hinkle M, Mack D et al. Complete genome sequence of Staphylococcus epidermidis 1457. Am Soc Microbiol 2017; 5:15–17 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Pidwill GR, Gibson JF, Cole J, Renshaw SA, Foster SJ. The role of macrophages in Staphylococcus aureus infection. Front Immunol 2021; 11:1–30 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Uribe-Querol E, Rosales C. Phagocytosis: our current understanding of a universal biological process. Front Immunol 2020; 11:1–13 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Li H, Jiang T, Li MQ, Zheng XL, Zhao GJ. Transcriptional regulation of macrophages polarization by microRNAs. Front Immunol 2018; 9:1–12 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Ross EA, Devitt A, Johnson JR. Macrophages: the good, the bad, and the gluttony. Front Immunol 2021; 12:3234 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Kaya E, Batoni G, Di Luca M, Apolloni E, Mazzoni A et al. Planktonic and biofilm-associated Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus epidermidis elicit differential human peripheral blood cell responses. Microorganisms 2021; 9: [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Zwicker P, Schmidt T, Hornschuh M, Lode H, Kramer A et al. In vitro response of THP-1 derived macrophages to antimicrobially effective PHMB-coated Ti6Al4V alloy implant material with and without contamination with S. epidermidis and P. aeruginosa. Biomater Res 2022; 26:1–13 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Strunk T, Prosser A, Levy O, Philbin V, Simmer K et al. Responsiveness of human monocytes to the commensal bacterium Staphylococcus epidermidis develops late in gestation. Pediatr Res 2012; 72:10–18 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Montgomery CP, Boyle-Vavra S, Roux A, Ebine K, Sonenshein AL et al. CodY deletion enhances in vivo virulence of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clone USA300. Infect Immun 2012; 80:2382–2389 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Stenzel W, Soltek S, Sanchez-Ruiz M, Akira S, Miletic H et al. Both TLR2 and TLR4 are required for the effective immune response in Staphylococcus aureus-induced experimental murine brain abscess. Am J Pathol 2008; 172:132–145 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Liu B, Fu Y, Feng S, Zhang X, Liu Z et al. Involvement of RP105 and toll-like receptors in the activation of mouse peritoneal macrophages by Staphylococcus aureus. Scand J Immunol 2013; 78:8–16 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.001837
Loading
/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.001837
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error