Skip to content
1887

Abstract

Ceftobiprole is an advanced-generation broad-spectrum parenteral cephalosporin with activity against MSSA and MRSA.

Ceftobiprole is not currently approved for use to treat bacteremia and phase three clinical trials are taking place. Drug approval requires further pre-clinical evidence to support this new indication.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of ceftobiprole at the human equivalent efficacious exposure (considering a 500 mg q8h dosing regimen infused over 2 h) against MSSA and MRSA strains in a neutropenic murine model of bacteremia and disseminated infection.

Two bioluminescent-tagged strains (one MSSA and one MRSA strain) were selected based on their susceptibility and growth profiles. Bacterial c.f.u. counts in the blood, lung, kidney, and liver were determined 48 h post-infection or after death. The bioluminescent-tag allowed the visualization of the real-time effects of ceftobiprole therapy compared to the natural progression of the infection in untreated controls.

Treatment with ceftobiprole resulted in a significant reduction of the bacterial load with the bioluminescence reduced by 2-log units and bacterial c.f.u. counts reduced by 3- to 6-log units, depending on the organ and bacterial strain. Survival was 100 % in the ceftobiprole-treated group compared to only 0–20 % survival in the untreated control animals for both strains tested.

These results suggest that treatment with ceftobiprole using a 500 mg q8h dosing regimen studied in several successful phase three trials, has potential as an antibiotic therapy to treat bacteremia and associated disseminated infections caused by either methicillin-susceptible or methicillin-resistant strains of .

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (Award HHSO100201600002C)
    • Principle Award Recipient: NotApplicable
  • This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.001755
2023-10-04
2025-01-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jmm/72/10/jmm001755.html?itemId=/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.001755&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Rudd KE, Johnson SC, Agesa KM, Shackelford KA, Tsoi D et al. Global, regional, and national sepsis incidence and mortality, 1990-2017: analysis for the global burden of disease study. Lancet 2020; 395:200–211 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Rello J, Valenzuela-Sánchez F, Ruiz-Rodriguez M, Moyano S. Sepsis: a review of advances in management. Adv Ther 2017; 34:2393–2411 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Cecconi M, Evans L, Levy M, Rhodes A. Sepsis and septic shock. Lancet 2018; 392:75–87 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Hassoun A, Linden PK, Friedman B. Incidence, prevalence, and management of MRSA bacteremia across patient populations-a review of recent developments in MRSA management and treatment. Crit Care 2017; 21:211 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Steinkraus G, White R, Friedrich L. Vancomycin MIC creep in non-vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (VISA), vancomycin-susceptible clinical methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) blood isolates from 2001-05. J Antimicrob Chemother 2007; 60:788–794 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Sharma M, Riederer K, Chase P, Khatib R. High rate of decreasing daptomycin susceptibility during the treatment of persistent Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2008; 27:433–437 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Shang W, Rao Y, Zheng Y, Yang Y, Hu Q et al. β-Lactam antibiotics enhance the pathogenicity of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus via SarA-controlled lipoprotein-like cluster expression. mBio 2019; 10:e00880-19 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Soriano A, Morata L. Ceftobripole: experience in staphylococcal bacteremia. Rev Esp Quimioter 2019; 32:24–28 [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Morosini MI, Díez-Aguilar M, Cantón R. Mechanisms of action and antimicrobial activity of ceftobiprole. Rev Esp Quimioter 2019; 32:3–10 [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Lupia T, Pallotto C, Corcione S, Boglione L, De Rosa FG. Ceftobiprole Perspective: current and Potential Future Indications. Antibiotics 2021; 10:170 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Hamed K, Engelhardt M, Jones ME, Saulay M, Holland TL et al. Ceftobiprole versus daptomycin in Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: a novel protocol for a double-blind, Phase III trial. Future Microbiol 2020; 15:35–48 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Abraham L, Bamberger DM. Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: contemporary management. Mo Med 2020; 117:341–345 [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Pfaller MA, Flamm RK, Mendes RE, Streit JM, Smart JI et al. Ceftobiprole activity against gram-positive and -negative pathogens collected from the United States in 2006 and 2016. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2019; 63:e01566-18 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Wenk M, Vozeh S, Follath F. Serum level monitoring of antibacterial drugs. A review. Clin Pharmacokinet 1984; 9:475–492 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Francis KP, Joh D, Bellinger-Kawahara C, Hawkinson MJ, Purchio TF et al. Monitoring bioluminescent Staphylococcus aureus infections in living mice using a novel luxABCDE construct. Infect Immun 2000; 68:3594–3600 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically; approved standard. In CLSI Document M07-A9, Ninth. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2012
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; Twenty-Second informational supplement. In CLSI Document M100-S24 Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2014
    [Google Scholar]
  18. European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Clinical breakpoints – bacterial (version 8.0); 2018
  19. Flamm RK, Duncan LR, Hamed KA, Smart JI, Mendes RE et al. Ceftobiprole Activity against bacteria from skin and skin structure infections in the United States from 2016 through 2018. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2020; 64:e02566-19 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Pfaller MA, Flamm RK, Duncan LR, Streit JM, Castanheira M et al. Antimicrobial activity of ceftobiprole and comparator agents when tested against contemporary gram-positive and -negative organisms collected from Europe (2015). Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2018; 91:77–84 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Murthy B, Schmitt-Hoffmann A. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ceftobiprole, an anti-MRSA cephalosporin with broad-spectrum activity. Clin Pharmacokinet 2008; 47:21–33 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Antimicrobial Resistance Collaborators Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: a systematic analysis. Lancet 202202724 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Zhao M, Lepak AJ, Andes DR. Animal models in the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic evaluation of antimicrobial agents. Bioorg Med Chem 2016; 24:6390–6400 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Uchino S, Kellum JA, Bellomo R, Doig GS, Morimatsu H et al. Beginning and ending supportive therapy for the kidney (BEST kidney) investigators. acute renal failure in critically ill patients: a multinational, multicenter study. J Am Med Assoc 2005; 94:813–818 [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Bhalodi AA, Crandon JL, Biek D, Nicolau DP. Efficacy of ceftaroline fosamil in a Staphylococcal murine pneumonia model. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2012; 56:6160–6165 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.001755
Loading
/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.001755
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error