Introduction. Totally implanted venous access ports (TIVAPs) are widely used in patients receiving long-term chemotherapy but may lead to serious complications such as catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs). Diagnosis of CRBSI requires catheter culture, but there is no consensus on microbiological culture methods to be adopted.
Aim. To compare three different procedures to recover bacterial cells from colonized catheters and to determine which section of the TIVAP (i.e. tip, septum, reservoir) is the probable source of infection. To investigate the correlation between blood culture results and TIVAP culture in order to get further evidence about the utility of differential time to positivity (DTP) as a diagnostic tool before TIVAP removal.
Hypothesis/Gap statement. Comparisons of different diagnostic procedures for catheter culture have been rarely reported for TIVAPs. We hypothesized that the optimization of methods to recover micro-organisms from different parts of TIVAPs may help to decrease the number of false-negative results in the diagnosis of TIVAP-related bloodstream infections.
Methodology. A total of 53 TIVAPs removed because of suspected infection (n=36) or end of use (n=17) were evaluated. The reservoir, the septum and the catheter tip were separated and subjected to different treatments for the recovery of adherent micro-organisms: (a) flushing of the catheter lumen, (b) sonication and flushing, (c) treatment with dithiothreitol and flushing. The three methods were also evaluated in an in vitro catheter infection model with Staphylococcus epidermidis. Culture results were compared to those obtained from paired blood cultures drawn from TIVAP and peripheral vein and to the relative DTP.
Results. The results obtained demonstrated that vigorous flushing/vortexing of the catheter lumen/septum, allows the recovery of a number of micro-organisms comparable to that of more complex procedures such as sonication or chemical treatment. Among 24 positive TIVAP-cultures, nine were tip-culture negative, whereas the corresponding reservoirs and septa were culture positive. A good correlation was observed between DTP and TIVAP cultures (P<0.001).
Conclusions. The results support the evidence that sending the port reservoir in addition to the catheter tip to the microbiology laboratory may increase the sensitivity and the accuracy of CRBSI diagnosis. Moreover, when a TIVAP-related infection is suspected, DTP is a useful diagnostic tool to decide between device removal or a more conservative approach.
LebeauxD,
Fernández-HidalgoN,
ChauhanA,
LeeS,
GhigoJM et al. Management of infections related to totally implantable venous-access ports: challenges and perspectives. Lancet Infect Dis2014; 14:146–159 [View Article][PubMed]
MachatS,
EisenhuberE,
PfarlG,
StüblerJ,
KoelblingerC et al. Complications of central venous port systems: a pictorial review. Insights Imaging2019; 10:86 [View Article][PubMed]
ShimJ,
SeoTS,
SongMG,
ChaIH,
KimJS et al. Incidence and risk factors of infectious complications related to implantable venous-access ports. Korean J Radiol2014; 15:494–500 [View Article][PubMed]
NarducciF,
Jean-LaurentM,
BoulangerL,
El BédouiS,
MalletY et al. Totally implantable venous access port systems and risk factors for complications: a one-year prospective study in a cancer centre. Eur J Surg Oncol2011; 37:913–918 [View Article][PubMed]
BouzaE,
AlvaradoN,
AlcaláL,
PérezMJ,
RincónC et al. A randomized and prospective study of 3 procedures for the diagnosis of catheter-related bloodstream infection without catheter withdrawal. Clin Infect Dis2007; 44:820–826 [View Article][PubMed]
MermelLA,
AllonM,
BouzaE,
CravenDE,
FlynnP et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of intravascular catheter-related infection: 2009 update by the infectious diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis2009; 49:1–45 [View Article][PubMed]
GominetM,
CompainF,
BeloinC,
LebeauxD.
Central venous catheters and biofilms: where do we stand in 2017?. APMIS2017; 125:365–375 [View Article][PubMed]
BouzaE,
AlvaradoN,
AlcaláL,
Sánchez-CondeM,
PérezMJ et al. A prospective, randomized, and comparative study of 3 different methods for the diagnosis of intravascular catheter colonization. Clin Infect Dis2005; 40:1096–1100 [View Article][PubMed]
MakiDG,
WeiseCE,
SarafinHW.
A semiquantitative culture method for identifying intravenous-catheter-related infection. N Engl J Med Overseas Ed1977; 296:1305–1309 [View Article]
PinelliF,
CeceroE,
Degl'InnocentiD,
SelmiV,
GiuaR et al. Infection of totally implantable venous access devices: a review of the literature. J Vasc Access2018; 19:230–242 [View Article][PubMed]
SlobbeL,
El BarzouhiA,
BoersmaE,
RijndersBJA.
Comparison of the roll plate method to the sonication method to diagnose catheter colonization and bacteremia in patients with long-term tunnelled catheters: a randomized prospective study. J Clin Microbiol2009; 47:885–888 [View Article][PubMed]
DragoL,
RomanòCL,
MattinaR,
SignoriV,
De VecchiE.
Does dithiothreitol improve bacterial detection from infected prostheses? A pilot study. Clin Orthop Relat Res2012; 470:2915–2925 [View Article][PubMed]
De VecchiE,
BottagisioM,
BortolinM,
ToscanoM,
LovatiAB et al. Improving the bacterial recovery by using dithiothreitol with aerobic and anaerobic broth in biofilm-related prosthetic and joint infections. Adv Exp Med Biol2017; 973:31–39 [View Article][PubMed]
LonguetP,
DouardMC,
ArletG,
MolinaJM,
BenoitC et al. Venous access port-related bacteremia in patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome or cancer: the reservoir as a diagnostic and therapeutic tool. Clin Infect Dis2001; 32:1776–1783 [View Article][PubMed]
BouzaE,
Martín-RabadánP,
EchenagusiaA,
CamúñezF,
Rodríguez-RosalesG et al. Diagnosis of venous access port colonization requires cultures from multiple sites: should guidelines be amended?. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis2014; 78:162–167 [View Article][PubMed]
MagiorakosA-P,
SrinivasanA,
CareyRB,
CarmeliY,
FalagasME et al. Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria: an international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance. Clin Microbiol Infect2012; 18:268–281 [View Article][PubMed]
BrancatisanoFL,
MaisettaG,
Di LucaM,
EsinS,
BottaiD et al. Inhibitory effect of the human liver-derived antimicrobial peptide hepcidin 20 on biofilms of polysaccharide intercellular adhesin (PIA)-positive and PIA-negative strains of Staphylococcus epidermidis
. Biofouling2014; 30:435–446 [View Article][PubMed]
RaadI,
CostertonW,
SabharwalU,
SacilowskiM,
AnaissieE et al. Ultrastructural analysis of indwelling vascular catheters: a quantitative relationship between luminal colonization and duration of placement. J Infect Dis1993; 168:400–407 [View Article][PubMed]
ErbS,
FreiR,
SchregenbergerK,
DangelM,
NogarthD et al. Sonication for diagnosis of catheter-related infection is not better than traditional roll-plate culture: a prospective cohort study with 975 central venous catheters. Clin Infect Dis2014; 59:541–544 [View Article][PubMed]
GuembeM,
Martín-RabadánP,
EchenagusiaA,
CamúñezF,
Rodríguez-RosalesG et al. How should long-term tunneled central venous catheters be managed in microbiology laboratories in order to provide an accurate diagnosis of colonization?. J Clin Microbiol2012; 50:1003–1007 [View Article][PubMed]
DragoL,
SignoriV,
De VecchiE,
VassenaC,
PalazziE et al. Use of dithiothreitol to improve the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infections. J Orthop Res2013; 31:1694–1699 [View Article][PubMed]
Di LucaM,
NavariE,
EsinS,
MenichiniM,
BarniniS et al. Detection of biofilms in biopsies from chronic rhinosinusitis patients: in vitro biofilm forming ability and antimicrobial susceptibility testing in biofilm mode of growth of isolated bacteria. Adv Exp Med Biol2018; 1057:1–27 [View Article][PubMed]
LebeauxD,
LarroqueB,
Gellen-DautremerJ,
Leflon-GuiboutV,
DreyerC et al. Clinical outcome after a totally implantable venous access port-related infection in cancer patients: a prospective study and review of the literature. Medicine2012; 91:309–318 [View Article][PubMed]
LorenteL,
MartínMM,
VidalP,
RebolloS,
OstabalMI et al. Working group on catheter related infection suspicion management of GTEIS/SEMICYUC. Should central venous catheter be systematically removed in patients with suspected catheter related infection?. Crit Care2014; 18:564
TimsitJ-F,
RuppM,
BouzaE,
ChopraV,
KärpänenT et al. A state of the art review on optimal practices to prevent, recognize, and manage complications associated with intravascular devices in the critically ill. Intensive Care Med2018; 44:742–759 [View Article][PubMed]
RaadI,
HannaHA,
AlakechB,
ChatzinikolaouI,
JohnsonMM et al. Differential time to positivity: a useful method for diagnosing catheter-related bloodstream infections. Ann Intern Med2004; 140:18–25 [View Article][PubMed]
ChadwickPR,
RyanK,
TeubnerA,
BondA,
AbrahamA et al. Sensitivity of differential time to positivity compared to pour plates for diagnosing catheter-related blood stream infection: an evaluation in patients with chronic intestinal failure. Clin Nutr2020; 39:33161–33169 [View Article][PubMed]
RijndersBJ,
VerwaestC,
PeetermansWE,
WilmerA,
VandecasteeleS et al. Difference in time to positivity of hub-blood versus nonhub-blood cultures is not useful for the diagnosis of catheter-related bloodstream infection in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med2001; 29:1399–1403 [View Article][PubMed]
BouzaE,
AlcaláL,
MuñozP,
Martin-RabadánP,
GuembeM et al. GEIDI and the COMIC study groups. Can microbiologists help to assess catheter involvement in candicaemic patients before removal?. Clin Microbiol Infect2013; 19:E129–E135
Orihuela-MartínJ,
Rodríguez-NúñezO,
MorataL,
CardozoC,
Puerta-AlcaldeP et al. Performance of differential time to positivity as a routine diagnostic test for catheter-related bloodstream infections: a single-centre experience. Clin Microbiol Infect2020; 26:383.e1–38383 [View Article][PubMed]