1887

Abstract

Periodontitis is among the most widespread oral bacterial diseases affecting 15-20% of the world population.

. This study aimed to develop dental floss impregnated with povidone-iodine (PVP-I) as an antimicrobial delivery system against periodontopathogenic bacteria in a planktonic form and within biofilms.

Identical lengths of dental floss impregnated with PVP-I formulations were placed on agar along with previously grown periodontal pathogens. The bioactivity of the dental floss was investigated by response-surface methodology. In order to explore the antibacterial activity of the selected formulation and the potential application in the prevention and treatment of plaque-caused diseases such as periodontitis and caries, the antibacterial and anti-biofilm activity of the selected PVP-I formulation against pathogenic bacteria were investigated.

The results indicated that the coating formulation containing Eudragit L-100 2.90 %, PVP-I 24.58 % and PEG 400 3.73 % had antimicrobial activity for all pathogens. The mechanism of this formulation involved disruption of bacterial cell membranes. Moreover, this formulation inhibited the formation of oral pathogenic biofilms.

It was concluded that Eudragit L-100 and PVP-I-coated dental floss represented a potential therapeutic agent to prevent periodontal diseases and dental caries and exhibited non-toxicity to periodontal ligament cells.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.001126
2020-01-24
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jmm/69/2/298.html?itemId=/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.001126&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Corbet EF. Periodontal diseases in Asians. J Int Acad Periodontol 2006; 8:136–144
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Corbet EF, Leung WK. Epidemiology of periodontitis in the Asia and Oceania regions. Periodontol 2000 2011; 56:25–64 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Emani S, Gunjiganur G, Mehta D. Determination of the antibacterial activity of simvastatin against periodontal pathogens, Porphyromonas gingivalis and Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans: An in vitro study. Contemp Clin Dent 2014; 5:377–382 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Asadoorian J. Oral rinsing. Can J Dent Hyg 2006; 40:1–13
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Gunsolley JC. Clinical efficacy of antimicrobial mouthrinses. J Dent 2010; 38:S6–S10 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Zamora JL. Chemical and microbiologic characteristics and toxicity of povidone iodine solutions. Am J Surg 1996; 151:401–406
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Chundamala J, Wright JG. The efficacy and risks of using povidone iodine irrigation to prevent surgical site infection: an evidence-based review. Can J Surg 2007; 50:473–481
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Mycock G. Methicillin/antiseptic-resistant Staphylococcus aureus . The Lancet 1985; 326:949–950 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Lacey RW, Catto A. Action of povidone–iodine against methicillin-sensitive and -resistant cultures of Staphylococcus aureus . Postgrad Med J 1993; 69:78–83
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Zasloff M. Antimicrobial peptides of multicellular organisms. Nature 2002; 415:389–395 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Faot F, Cavalcanti YW, e Bertolini MdeM, Pinto LdeR, da Silva WJ et al. Efficacy of citric acid denture cleanser on the Candida albicans biofilm formed on poly(methyl methacrylate): effects on residual biofilm and recolonization process. BMC Oral Health 2014; 14:1–7 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. López-Jornet P, Plana-Ramon E, Leston JS, Pons-Fuster A. Short-term side effects of 0.2% alcohol-free chlorhexidine mouthrinse in geriatric patients: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Gerodontology 2012; 29:292–298 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Salas ML, McClellan AC, MacNeill SR, Satheesh KM, Cobb CM. Interproximal cervical lesions caused by incorrect flossing technique. Int J Dent Hyg 2012; 10:83–85 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Asadoorian J, Locker D. The impact of quality assurance programming: a comparison of two Canadian dental hygienist programs. J Dent Educ 2006; 70:965–971
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Hujoel PP, Cunha-Cruz J, Banting DW, Loesche WJ. Dental flossing and interproximal caries: a systematic review. J Dent Res 2006; 85:298–305 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Haas AN, Wagner TP, Muniz FWMG, Fiorini T, Cavagni J et al. Essential oils-containing mouthwashes for gingivitis and plaque: meta-analyses and meta-regression. J Dent 2016; 55:7–15 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Widjaja M, Gan J, Talpaneni J, Tjandrawinata R. Determination of Eudragit L100 in an enteric-coated tablet formulation using size-exclusion chromatography with charged-aerosol detection. Sci Pharm 2018; 86:38–8 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Cilurzo F, Selmin F, Minghetti P, Rimoldi I, Demartin F et al. Fast-dissolving mucoadhesive microparticulate delivery system containing piroxicam. Eur J Pharm Sci 2005; 24:355–361 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Nehal Siddiqui MD, Garg G, Sharma PK. A short review on “A novel approach in oral fast dissolving drug delivery system and their patents”. Advan Biol Res 2011; 5:291–303
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Meghil MM, Rueggeberg F, El-Awady A, Miles B, Tay F et al. Novel coating of surgical suture confers antimicrobial activity against Porphyromonas gingivalis and Enterococcus faecalis . J Periodontol 2015; 86:788–794 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Sa A, Sawatdee S, Phadoongsombut N, Buatong W, Nakpeng T et al. Quantitative analysis of povidone-iodine thin films by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and their physicochemical properties. Acta Pharm 2017; 67:169–186 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Tsaousoglou P, Nietzsche S, Cachovan G, Sculean A, Eick S. Antibacterial activity of moxifloxacin on bacteria associated with periodontitis within a biofilm. J Med Microbiol 2014; 63:284–292 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute M7-A7. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically; approved standard, 7th ed. Wayne PA: 2006
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Liu Y, Wang L, Zhou X, Hu S, Zhang S et al. Effect of the antimicrobial decapeptide KSL on the growth of oral pathogens and Streptococcus mutans biofilm. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2011; 37:33–38 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Rojanarat W, Nakpheng T, Thawithong E, Yanyium N, Srichana T. Levofloxacin-proliposomes: opportunities for use in lung tuberculosis. Pharmaceutics 2012; 4:385–412 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Ding Y, Wang W, Fan M, Tong Z, Kuang R et al. Antimicrobial and anti-biofilm effect of Bac8c on major bacteria associated with dental caries and Streptococcus mutans biofilms. Peptides 2014; 52:61–67 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Takahashi N, Ishihara K, Kato T, Okuda K. Susceptibility of Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans to six antibiotics decreases as biofilm matures. J Antimicrob Chemother 2007; 59:59–65 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Wang H-Y, Cheng J-W, Yu H-Y, Lin L, Chih Y-H et al. Efficacy of a novel antimicrobial peptide against periodontal pathogens in both planktonic and polymicrobial biofilm states. Acta Biomater 2015; 25:150–161 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Aramwit P, Kanokpanont S, De-Eknamkul W, Kamei K, Srichana T. The effect of sericin with variable amino-acid content from different silk strains on the production of collagen and nitric oxide. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 2009; 20:1295–1306 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Selvaggi G, Monstrey S, Van Landuyt K, Hamdi M, Blondeel P. The role of iodine in antisepsis and wound management: a reappraisal. Acta Chir Belg 2003; 103:241–247 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Reimer K, Wichelhaus TA, Schäfer V, Rudolph P, Kramer A et al. Antimicrobial effectiveness of povidone-iodine and consequences for new application areas. Dermatology 2002; 204:114–120 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Shimizu M, Okuzumi K, Yoneyama A, Kunisada T, Araake M et al. In vitro antiseptic susceptibility of clinical isolates from nosocomial infections. Dermatology 2002; 204:21–27 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Kumar BPR, Maddi A, Ramesh KV, Baliga MJ, Rao SN et al. Is povidone-iodine a hemostyptic? a clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006; 35:765–766 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Kalil SJ, Maugeri F, Rodrigues MI. Response surface analysis and simulation as a tool for bioprocess design and optimization. Process Biochem 2000; 35:539–550 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  35. König B, Reimer K, Fleischer W, König W. Effects of Betaisodona on parameters of host defense. Dermatology 1997; 195:42–48 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Brogden KA. Antimicrobial peptides: pore formers or metabolic inhibitors in bacteria?. Nat Rev Microbiol 2005; 3:238–250 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Mason AJ, Chotimah INH, Bertani P, Bechinger B. A spectroscopic study of the membrane interaction of the antimicrobial peptide pleurocidin. Mol Membr Biol 2006; 23:185–194 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Rackur H. New aspects of mechanism of action of povidone-iodine. J Hosp Infect 1985; 6 Suppl A:13–23 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Farquharson SI, Germaine GR, Gray GR. Isolation and characterization of the cell-surface polysaccharides of Porphyromonas gingivalis ATCC 53978. Oral Microbiol Immunol 2000; 15:151–157 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Socransky SS, Haffajee AD. Periodontal microbial ecology. Periodontol 2005; 38:135–187 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Oduwole KO, Glynn AA, Molony DC, Murray D, Rowe S et al. Anti-biofilm activity of sub-inhibitory povidone-iodine concentrations against Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus aureus . J Orthop Res 2010; 28:1252–1256 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Yanai R, Yamada N, Ueda K, Tajiri M, Matsumoto T et al. Evaluation of povidone-iodine as a disinfectant solution for contact lenses: antimicrobial activity and cytotoxicity for corneal epithelial cells. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2006; 29:85–91 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.001126
Loading
/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.001126
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error