Introduction: Onychomycosis is a debilitating, difficult-to-treat nail fungal infection with increasing prevalence worldwide. The main etiological agents are dermatophytes, which are common causative pathogens in superficial fungal mycoses. Conventional detection methods such as fungal culture have low sensitivity and specificity and are time-consuming.
Aim: The main objective of this study was to design, develop and validate a real-time probe-based multiplex qPCR assay for the detection of dermatophytes and Fusarium species.
Methodology: The performance characteristics of the qPCR assays were evaluated. The multiplex qPCR assays targeted four genes (assay 1: pan-dermatophytes/Fusarium spp.; assay 2: Trichophyton rubrum/Microsporum spp.). Analytical validation was accomplished using 150 fungal isolates and clinical validation was done on 204 nail specimens. The performance parameters were compared against the gold standard (fungal culture) and expanded gold standard (culture in conjunction with sequencing).
Results: Both the single-plex and multiplex qPCR assays performed well especially when compared against the expanded gold standard. Among the 204 tested nail specimens, the culture method showed that 125 (61.3 %) were infected with at least one organism, of which 40 yielded positive results for dermatophytes and Fusarium spp. These target organisms detected include 20 dermatophytes and 22 Fusarium spp. The developed qPCR assays demonstrated excellent limit of detection, efficiency, coefficient of determination, analytical and clinical sensitivity and specificity.
Conclusion: The multiplex qPCR assays were reliable for the diagnosis of onychomycosis, with shorter turn-around time as compared to culture method. This aids in the planning of treatment strategies to achieve optimal therapeutic outcome.
MiyajimaY,
SatohK,
UchidaT,
YamadaT,
AbeM et al. Rapid real-time diagnostic PCR for Trichophyton rubrum and Trichophyton mentagrophytes in patients with tinea unguium and tinea pedis using specific fluorescent probes. J Dermatol Sci2013; 69:229–235 [View Article]
ChandranNS,
PanJY,
PramonoZAD,
TanHH,
SeowCS.
Complementary role of a polymerase chain reaction test in the diagnosis of onychomycosis. Australas J Dermatol2013; 54:105–108 [View Article]
HaldaneDJ,
RobartE.
A comparison of calcofluor white, potassium hydroxide, and culture for the laboratory diagnosis of superficial fungal infection. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis1990; 13:337–339 [View Article]
HaghaniI,
ShokohiT,
HajheidariZ,
KhalilianA,
AghiliSR.
Comparison of diagnostic methods in the evaluation of onychomycosis. Mycopathologia2013; 175:315–321 [View Article]
Brillowska-DabrowskaA,
SaunteDM,
ArendrupMC.
Five-hour diagnosis of dermatophyte nail infections with specific detection of Trichophyton rubrum. J Clin Microbiol2007; 45:1200–1204 [View Article]
GutzmerR,
MommertS,
KüttlerU,
WerfelT,
KappA.
Rapid identification and differentiation of fungal DNA in dermatological specimens by LightCycler PCR. J Med Microbiol2004; 53:1207–1214 [View Article]
KondoriN,
AbrahamssonAL,
AtaollahyN,
WenneråsC.
Comparison of a new commercial test, Dermatophyte-PCR kit, with conventional methods for rapid detection and identification of Trichophyton rubrum in nail specimens. Med Mycol2010; 48:1005–1008 [View Article]
BorkowskiP,
WilliamsM,
HolewinskiJ,
BakoticB.
Onychomycosis: an analysis of 50 cases and a comparison of diagnostic techniques. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc2001; 91:351–355 [View Article]
WisselinkGJ,
van ZantenE,
Kooistra-SmidAMD.
Trapped in keratin; a comparison of dermatophyte detection in nail, skin and hair samples directly from clinical samples using culture and real-time PCR. J Microbiol Methods2011; 85:62–66 [View Article]
ArabatzisM,
Bruijnesteijn van CoppenraetLES,
KuijperEJ,
de HoogGS,
LavrijsenAPM et al. Diagnosis of common dermatophyte infections by a novel multiplex real-time polymerase chain reaction detection/identification scheme. Br J Dermatol2007; 157:681–689 [View Article]
MuraosaY,
SchreiberAZ,
TrabassoP,
MatsuzawaT,
TaguchiH et al. Development of cycling probe-based real-time PCR system to detect Fusarium species and Fusarium solani species complex (FSSC). Int J Med Microbiol2014; 304:505–511 [View Article]
LeawSN,
ChangHC,
SunHF,
BartonR,
BoucharaJP et al. Identification of medically important yeast species by sequence analysis of the internal transcribed spacer regions. J Clin Microbiol2006; 44:693–699 [View Article]
BergmansAMC,
van der EntM,
KlaassenA,
BöhmN,
AndriesseGI et al. Evaluation of a single-tube real-time PCR for detection and identification of 11 dermatophyte species in clinical material. Clin Microbiol Infect2010; 16:704–710 [View Article]
Brillowska-DabrowskaA,
NielsenSS,
NielsenHV,
ArendrupMC.
Optimized 5-hour multiplex PCR test for the detection of tinea unguium: performance in a routine PCR laboratory. Med Mycol2010; 48:828–831 [View Article]
MotamediM,
MirhendiH,
ZomorodianK,
KhodadadiH,
KharaziM et al. Clinical evaluation of β-tubulin real-time PCR for rapid diagnosis of dermatophytosis, a comparison with mycological methods. Mycoses2017; 60:692–696 [View Article]
PaugamA,
L'ollivierC,
ViguiéC,
AnayaL,
MaryC et al. Comparison of real-time PCR with conventional methods to detect dermatophytes in samples from patients with suspected dermatophytosis. J Microbiol Methods2013; 95:218–222 [View Article]
SpiliopoulouA,
BartzavaliC,
JelastopuluE,
AnastassiouED,
ChristofidouM.
Evaluation of a commercial PCR test for the diagnosis of dermatophyte nail infections. J Med Microbiol2015; 64:25–31 [View Article]
MehligL,
GarveC,
RitschelA,
ZeilerA,
BrabetzW et al. Clinical evaluation of a novel commercial multiplex-based PCR diagnostic test for differential diagnosis of Dermatomycoses. Mycoses2014; 57:27–34 [View Article]
AmeenM,
LearJT,
MadanV,
Mohd MustapaMF,
RichardsonM.
British association of dermatologists' guidelines for the management of onychomycosis 2014. Br J Dermatol2014; 171:937–958 [View Article]
HayetteM-P,
SeidelL,
AdjeteyC,
DarfoufR,
WéryM et al. Clinical evaluation of the DermaGenius® nail real-time PCR assay for the detection of dermatophytes and Candida albicans in nails. Med Mycol2019; 57:277–283 [View Article]