1887

Abstract

Diphtheria is caused by toxigenic strains of , and . For diagnostic purposes, species identification and detection of toxigenic strains (diphtheria toxin ()positive strains) is typically performed using end-point PCR. A faster quadruplex real-time PCR (qPCR) was recently developed (De Zoysa . 2016;65(12):1521–1527).

We aimed to improve the quadruplex method by adding a 16S rRNA gene target as an internal processing control, providing confirmation of the presence of bacterial DNA in the assays, thus avoiding the possibility of false-negative reporting.

Universal 16S rRNA gene primers and a probe were defined. The novel method was tested using 36 bacterial isolates and 17 clinical samples. Experimental robustness to temperature and reagent concentration variations was assessed.

The method allows detection of the gene and distinguishing (including the newly described species ) from and . Complete diagnostic specificity, sensitivity and experimental robustness were demonstrated. The lower limit of detection for , and targets was 1.86 genome copies per 5 µl reaction volume. The method was successfully used on two distinct qPCR technologies (LightCycler 480, Roche Diagnostics and Rotor-Gene Q, Qiagen) and in two laboratories (Institut Pasteur, Paris, France and Public Health England – National Infection Service, London, UK).

This work describes validation of the improved qPCR quadruplex method and supports its implementation for the biological diagnosis of diphtheria.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.001070
2019-10-01
2019-10-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jmm/68/10/1455.html?itemId=/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.001070&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Dazas M, Badell E, Carmi-Leroy A, Criscuolo A, Brisse S. Taxonomic status of Corynebacterium diphtheriae biovar Belfanti and proposal of Corynebacterium belfantii sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018;68:3826–3831 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bolt F, Cassiday P, Tondella ML, Dezoysa A, Efstratiou A et al. Multilocus sequence typing identifies evidence for recombination and two distinct lineages of Corynebacterium diphtheriae. J Clin Microbiol 2010;48:4177–4185 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Lodeiro-Colatosti A, Reischl U, Holzmann T, Hernández-Pereira CE, Rísquez A et al. Diphtheria outbreak in Amerindian communities, Wonken, Venezuela, 2016-2017. Emerg Infect Dis 2018;24:1340–1344 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Dureab F, Müller O, Jahn A. Resurgence of diphtheria in Yemen due to population movement. J Travel Med 2018;25: [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Wagner KS, White JM, Lucenko I, Mercer D, Crowcroft NS et al. Diphtheria in the postepidemic period, Europe, 2000-2009. Emerg Infect Dis 2012;18:217–225 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Hacker E, Antunes CA, Mattos-Guaraldi AL, Burkovski A, Tauch A. Corynebacterium ulcerans, an emerging human pathogen. Future Microbiol 2016;11:1191–1208 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Abebe D, Sisay Tessema T. Determination of Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of isolates from lymph nodes of sheep and goats at an organic export abattoir, Modjo, Ethiopia. Lett Appl Microbiol 2015;61:469–476 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Join-Lambert OF, Ouache M, Canioni D, Beretti J-L, Blanche S et al. Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis necrotizing lymphadenitis in a twelve-year-old patient. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2006;25:848–851 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Torres L de FC, Ribeiro D, Hirata Jr R, Pacheco LGC, Souza MC et al. Multiplex polymerase chain reaction to identify and determine the toxigenicity of Corynebacterium spp with zoonotic potential and an overview of human and animal infections. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 2013;108:272–279 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Heggelund L, Gaustad P, Håvelsrud OE, Blom J, Borgen L et al. Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis pneumonia in a veterinary student infected during laboratory work. Open Forum Infect Dis 2015;2:ofv053 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Corboz L, Thoma R, Braun U, Zbinden R. [Isolation of Corynebacterium diphtheriae subsp. belfanti from a cow with chronic active dermatitis]. Schweiz Arch Tierheilkd 1996;138:596–599
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Hall AJ, Cassiday PK, Bernard KA, Bolt F, Steigerwalt AG et al. Novel Corynebacterium diphtheriae in domestic cats. Emerg Infect Dis 2010;16:688–691 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Leggett BA, De Zoysa A, Abbott YE, Leonard N, Markey B et al. Toxigenic Corynebacterium diphtheriae isolated from a wound in a horse. Vet Rec 2010;166:656–657 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Efstratiou A, George RC. Laboratory guidelines for the diagnosis of infections caused by Corynebacterium diphtheriae and C. ulcerans. World Health organization. Commun Dis Public Health 1999;2:250–257
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Engler KH, Glushkevich T, Mazurova IK, George RC, Efstratiou A. A modified Elek test for detection of toxigenic corynebacteria in the diagnostic laboratory. J Clin Microbiol 1997;35:495–498
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Neal SE, Efstratiou A. DIPNET, International diphtheria reference laboratories. International external quality assurance for laboratory diagnosis of diphtheria. J Clin Microbiol 2009;47:4037–4042
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Konrad R, Berger A, Huber I, Boschert V, Hörmansdorfer S et al. Matrix-Assisted laser desorption/ionisation time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry as a tool for rapid diagnosis of potentially toxigenic Corynebacterium species in the laboratory management of diphtheria-associated bacteria. Euro Surveill 2010;15:pii: 19699 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Farfour E, Leto J, Barritault M, Barberis C, Meyer J et al. Evaluation of the Andromas matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry system for identification of aerobically growing Gram-positive bacilli. J Clin Microbiol 2012;50:2702–2707 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Pallen MJ. Rapid screening for toxigenic Corynebacterium diphtheriae by the polymerase chain reaction. J Clin Pathol 1991;44:1025–1026 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Hauser D, Popoff MR, Kiredjian M, Boquet P, Bimet F. Polymerase chain reaction assay for diagnosis of potentially toxinogenic Corynebacterium diphtheriae strains: correlation with ADP-ribosylation activity assay. J Clin Microbiol 1993;31:2720–2723
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Pallen MJ, Hay AJ, Puckey LH, Efstratiou A. Polymerase chain reaction for screening clinical isolates of corynebacteria for the production of diphtheria toxin. J Clin Pathol 1994;47:353–356 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Mothershed EA, Cassiday PK, Pierson K, Mayer LW, Popovic T. Development of a real-time fluorescence PCR assay for rapid detection of the diphtheria toxin gene. J Clin Microbiol 2002;40:4713–4719 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Schuhegger R, Lindermayer M, Kugler R, Heesemann J, Busch U et al. Detection of toxigenic Corynebacterium diphtheriae and Corynebacterium ulcerans strains by a novel real-time PCR. J Clin Microbiol 2008;46:2822–2823 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Sing A, Berger A, Schneider-Brachert W, Holzmann T, Reischl U. Rapid detection and molecular differentiation of toxigenic Corynebacterium diphtheriae and Corynebacterium ulcerans strains by LightCycler PCR. J Clin Microbiol 2011;49:2485–2489 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Mancini F, Monaco M, Pataracchia M, von Hunolstein C, Pantosti A et al. Identification and molecular discrimination of toxigenic and nontoxigenic diphtheria Corynebacterium strains by combined real-time polymerase chain reaction assays. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2012;73:111–120 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. De Zoysa A, Efstratiou A, Mann G, Harrison TG, Fry NK. Development, validation and implementation of a quadruplex real-time PCR assay for identification of potentially toxigenic corynebacteria. J Med Microbiol 2016;65:1521–1527 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Saunders N, Zambon M, Sharp I, Siddiqui R, Bermingham A et al. Guidance on the development and validation of diagnostic tests that depend on nucleic acid amplification and detection. Journal of Clinical Virology 2013;56:344–354 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Murphy M, Corcoran D, Buckley JF, O'Mahony M, Whyte P et al. Development and application of multiple-locus variable number of tandem repeat analysis (MLVA) to subtype a collection of Listeria monocytogenes. Int J Food Microbiol 2007;115:187–194 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Pacheco LGC, Pena RR, Castro TLP, Dorella FA, Bahia RC et al. Multiplex PCR assay for identification of Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis from pure cultures and for rapid detection of this pathogen in clinical samples. J Med Microbiol 2007;56:480–486 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Pimenta FP, Matias GAM, Pereira GA, Camello TCF, Alves GB et al. A PCR for dtxR gene: application to diagnosis of non-toxigenic and toxigenic Corynebacterium diphtheriae. Mol Cell Probes 2008;22:189–192 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Philipp S, Huemer HP, Irschick EU, Gassner C. Obstacles of Multiplex Real-Time PCR for Bacterial 16S rDNA: Primer Specifity and DNA Decontamination of Taq Polymerase. Transfus Med Hemother 2010;37:21–28 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.001070
Loading
/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.001070
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error