1887

Abstract

Umbilical catheterization offers unique vascular access that is only possible in the neonatal setting due to unobstructed umbilical vessels from foetal circulation. With the cut of the umbilical cord, two arteries and a vein are dissected, allowing quick and painless catheterization of the neonate. Unfortunately, keeping the umbilical access sterile is challenging due to its mobility and necrosis of the umbilical stump, which makes it a perfect model for vessel catheter colonization analysis.

The aim of this study was to evaluate bacterial colonization of the umbilical catheter, with a focus on the difference between various sections of the catheter, the duration of catheterization, patient status and gestational age.

We performed bacterial cultures for 44 umbilical catheters, analysing the superficial and deep parts of the catheter separately, and revealed colonization in one-third of cases.

One hundred per cent of the colonization occurred in preterm infants, with a shift towards extreme prematurity. The catheters were mainly colonized by coagulase-negative staphylococci. The majority of catheters presented with superficial colonization dominance, and there were no cases of deep colonization. The bacterial strains and their resistance were consistent between the catheter’s proximal and distal parts, as well as positive blood cultures. The patients with the most intense bacterial catheter colonization presented with sepsis around removal time or a couple of days later, especially if they were extremely premature and exhibited very low birth weight. Catheterization time did not play a major role.

Umbilical catheters are vectors for skin microflora transmission to the bloodstream via biofilm formation, regardless of antibiotic use and the duration of catheterization, especially in preterm neonates.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.001034
2019-09-01
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jmm/68/9/1306.html?itemId=/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.001034&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Lawn JE, Cousens S, Zupan J. 4 million neonatal deaths: When? Where? Why?. Lancet 2005; 365:891–900 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Xu LC, Siedlecki CA. Antibacterial polyurethanes. In Cooper SL, Guan J. (editors) Advances in polyurethane biomaterials, 1th ed. Woodhead Publishing; 2016 pp 247–284
    [Google Scholar]
  3. VanEpps JS, Younger JG. Implantable Device-Related Infection. Shock 2016; 46:597–608 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Dudeck MA, Horan TC, Peterson KD, Allen-Bridson K, Morrell G et al. National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) Report, data summary for 2010, device-associated module. Am J Infect Control 2011; 39:798–816 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Sobczak A, Kruczek P, Homa M, Kwinta P. A new microscopic insight into the thrombogenicity of umbilical catheters. Thromb Res 2018; 168:80–82 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Anand V, Nair PMC. Neonatal seizures: predictors of adverse outcome. J Pediatr Neurosci 2014; 9:97 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Power Coombs MR, Kronforst K, Levy O. Neonatal host defense against Staphylococcal infections. Clin Dev Immunol 2013; 2013:1–9 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Kollmann TR, Levy O, Montgomery RR, Goriely S. Innate immune function by Toll-like receptors: distinct responses in newborns and the elderly. Immunity 2012; 37:771–783
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Mardaneh J, Soltan Dallal MM. Study of cronobacter sakazakii strains isolated from powdered milk infant formula by phenotypic and molecular methods in Iran. Arch Pediatr Infect Dis 2016; 5:e38867 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Mardaneh J, Soltan Dallal MM. Isolation and identification Enterobacter asburiae from consumed powdered infant formula milk in the neonatal intensive care unit. Acta Medica Iranica 2016; 54:39–43
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Lavoie PM, Huang Q, Jolette E, Whalen M, Nuyt AM et al. Profound lack of interleukin (IL)-12/IL-23p40 in neonates born early in gestation is associated with an increased risk of sepsis. J Infect Dis 2010; 202:1754–1763 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Garland JS, Uhing MR. Strategies to prevent bacterial and fungal infection in the neonatal intensive care unit. Clin Perinatol 2009; 36:1–13 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Dong Y, Speer CP. Late-onset neonatal sepsis: recent developments. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2015; 100:F257–F263 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Stoll BJ, Hansen N, Fanaroff AA, Wright LL, Carlo WA et al. Late-onset sepsis in very low birth weight neonates: the experience of the NICHD Neonatal Research Network. Pediatrics 2002; 110:285–291
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Curry S, Honeycutt M, Goins G, Gilliam C. Catheter-associated bloodstream infections in the NICU: getting to zero. Neonatal Netw 2009; 28:151–155 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Maki DG. Infections due to infusion therapy. In Bennett JV, Brachman PS. (editors) Hospital Infections, 3rd ed. Boston: Little Brown & Co; 1992 pp 849–898
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Keyworth N, Millar MR, Holland KT. Development of cutaneous microflora in premature neonates. Arch Dis Child 1992; 67:797–801 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Vaudaux P, Pittet D, Haeberli A, Lerch PG, Morgenthaler JJ et al. Fibronectin is more active than fibrin or fibrinogen in promoting Staphylococcus aureus adherence to inserted intravascular catheters. J Infect Dis 1993; 167:633–641 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Lai Y, Di Nardo A, Nakatsuji T, Leichtle A, Yang Y et al. Commensal bacteria regulate Toll-like receptor 3–dependent inflammation after skin injury. Nat Med 2009; 15:13771382 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Iwase T, Uehara Y, Shinji H, Tajima A, Seo H et al. Staphylococcus epidermidis Esp inhibits Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation and nasal colonization. Nature 2010; 465:346
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Cogen AL, Yamasaki K, Sanchez KM, Dorschner RA, Lai Y et al. Selective antimicrobial action is provided by phenol-soluble modulins derived from Staphylococcus epidermidis, a normal resident of the skin. J Invest Dermatol 2010; 130:192–200 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Marchant EA, Boyce GK, Sadarangani M, Lavoie PM. Neonatal sepsis due to coagulase-negative staphylococci. Clin Dev Immunol 2013; 2013:1–10 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Kline AM. Pediatric catheter-related bloodstream infections. AACN Clin Issues 2005; 16:185–198 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. de Brito CS, de Brito DV, Abdallah VO, Gontijo Filho PP. Occurrence of bloodstream infection with different types of central vascular catheter in critically neonates. J Infect 2010; 60:128–132 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Thomas D, Parameswaran N, Harish BN. Catheter related blood stream infections in the paediatric intensive care unit: A descriptive study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2013; 17:135–139 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Hashemizade Z, Emami A. Colonization rate of intravascular catheters and catheter related bloodstream infection in NICU Ward of Namazee Hospital, Shiraz, Iran. Arch Dis Childh 2008; 93:279–282
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Shah J, Jefferies AL, Yoon EW, Lee SK, Shah PS et al. Risk factors and outcomes of late-onset bacterial sepsis in preterm neonates born at < 32 weeks' gestation. Am J Perinatol 2015; 32:675–682 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Anderson-Berry A, Brinton B, Lyden E, Faix R. Risk factors associated with development of persistent coagulase-negative Staphylococci bacteremia in the neonate and associated short-term and discharge morbidities. Neonatology 2011; 99:23–31
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Liljedahl M, Bodin L, Schollin J. Coagulase-negative staphylococcal sepsis as a predictor of bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Acta Paediatr 2004; 93:211–215 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Schlapbach LJ, Aebischer M, Adams M, Natalucci G, Bonhoeffer J et al. Impact of sepsis on neurodevelopmental outcome in a Swiss National Cohort of extremely premature infants. Pediatrics 2011; 128:e348–357
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Stoll BJ, Hansen NI, Adams-Chapman I, Fanaroff AA, Hintz SR et al. Neurodevelopmental and growth impairment among extremely low-birth-weight infants with neonatal infection. JAMA 2004; 292:2357–2365 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Thant PM, Myint TT, Oo CC, Tar T. Microbial colonization of intravascular catheters inserted in newborn babies: a descriptive study. Clin Pediatr 2016; 01:e1000108 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Edwards JR, Peterson KD, Andrus ML, Tolson JS, Goulding JS et al. National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) Report, data summary for 2006, issued June 2007. Am J Infect Control 2007; 35:290–301 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Stoll BJ, Hansen NI, Bell EF, Walsh MC, Carlo WA et al. Trends in care practices, morbidity, and mortality of extremely preterm neonates, 1993-2012. JAMA 2015; 314:c1039–1051
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Isaacs D. Australasian Study Group For Neonatal Infections A ten year, multicentre study of coagulase negative staphylococcal infections in Australasian neonatal units. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2003; 88:F89–93 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Al-Taiar A, Hammoud MS, Cuiqing L, Lee JK, Lui KM et al. Neonatal infections in China, Malaysia, Hong Kong and Thailand. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2013; 98:F249–F255 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Hornik CP, Fort P, Clark RH, Watt K, Benjamin DK Jr et al. Early and late onset sepsis in very-low-birth-weight infants from a large group of neonatal intensive care units. Early Hum Dev 2012; 88:S69–S74 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Hira V, Sluijter M, Estevão S, Horst-Kreft D, Ott A et al. Clinical and molecular epidemiologic characteristics of coagulase-negative staphylococcal bloodstream infections in intensive care neonates. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2007; 26:607–612 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Lee SM, Chang M, Kim KS. Blood culture proven early onset sepsis and late onset sepsis in very-low-birth-weight infants in Korea. J Korean Med Sci 2015; 30:S67–74 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.001034
Loading
/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.001034
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error