1887

Abstract

Dientamoebiasis is globally distributed and detected in a large number of subjects with diarrhea, abdominal discomfort, flatulence, fatigue and loss of appetite. The life cycle and transmission of Dientamoeba fragilis are poorly understood. Microscopic examination of permanent stained smears is traditionally employed to diagnose the infection. However, this approach is time-consuming and the success in detecting D. fragilis depends on the microscopist’s experience. Hence, only a few laboratories routinely carry out tests for D. fragilis. Consequently, the prevalence of D. fragilis infection is probably underestimated. Although novel, rapid and more sensitive diagnostic tests are becoming available for detecting intestinal parasites, they also possess some limitations. The aim of this study was to emphasize the importance of performing microscopic examination of permanent stained smears from at least one fresh stool specimen after sample arrival at the laboratory, as a mandatory practice for the diagnosis of dientamoebiasis, particulary where it is not possible to perform molecular assays.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.000983
2019-05-03
2024-03-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jmm/68/6/890.html?itemId=/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.000983&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Garcia LS. Dientamoeba fragilis, one of the neglected intestinal protozoa. J Clin Microbiol 2016; 54:2243–2250 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Miguel L, Salvador F, Sulleiro E et al. Clinical and epidemiological characteristics of patients with Dientamoeba fragilis infection. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2018
    [Google Scholar]
  3. van Gestel RS, Kusters JG, Monkelbaan JF. A clinical guideline on Dientamoeba fragilis infections. Parasitology 20181–9 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Rostami A, Riahi SM, Haghighi A, Saber V, Armon B et al. The role of Blastocystis sp. and Dientamoeba fragilis in irritable bowel syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Parasitol Res 2017; 116:2361–2371 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Stark D, Barratt J, Chan D, Ellis JT. Dientamoeba fragilis, the neglected trichomonad of the human bowel. Clin Microbiol Rev 2016; 29:553–580 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute Procedures for the Recovery and Identification of Parasites from the Intestinal Tract approved standard , CLSI document M28-A2. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2005
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Chan D, Barratt J, Roberts T, Phillips O, Šlapeta J et al. Detection of Dientamoeba fragilis in animal faeces using species specific real time PCR assay. Vet Parasitol 2016; 227:42–47 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Abu-Madi M, Boughattas S, Behnke JM, Sharma A, Ismail A. Coproscopy and molecular screening for detection of intestinal protozoa. Parasit Vectors 2017; 10:414 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Stark D, Garcia LS, Barratt JL, Phillips O, Roberts T et al. Description of Dientamoeba fragilis cyst and precystic forms from human samples. J Clin Microbiol 2014; 52:2680–2683 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Burrows RB, Swerdlow MA. Enterobius vermicularis as a probable vector of Dientamoeba fragilis. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1956; 5:258–265 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Sukanahaketu S. The presence of Dientamoeba fragilis in the Ascaris lumbricoides ova: the first report from Thailand. J Med Assoc Thai 1977; 60:256–258
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Ögren J, Dienus O, Löfgren S, Iveroth P, Matussek A. Dientamoeba fragilis DNA detection in Enterobius vermicularis eggs. Pathog Dis 2013; 69:157–158 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Clark CG, Röser D, Stensvold CR. Transmission of Dientamoeba fragilis: pinworm or cysts?. Trends Parasitol 2014; 30:136–140 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Barratt JL, Harkness J, Marriott D, Ellis JT, Stark D. The ambiguous life of Dientamoeba fragilis: the need to investigate current hypotheses on transmission. Parasitology 2011; 138:557–572 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.000983
Loading
/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.000983
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error