1887

Abstract

. The present study evaluated the possible synergistic antimycobacterial interactions of and essential oils (EO).

. Antimycobacterial potential was tested against and using broth and water dilution method and checkerboard synergy method. Antiadhesion and antibiofilm effect of EOs was evaluated on biotic (HeLa cells) and abiotic surface (polystyrene). To evaluate the possible mechanisms of action, cellular leakage of proteins and DNA was tested and structural changes were visualized with a transmission electron microscope.

MIC, minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) and minimal effective concentration (MEC) were 1.6 mg ml for EO and 3.2 mg ml for EO against both mycobacteria. All combinations of EOs in checkerboard synergy method produced fractional inhibitory concentration index values ranging from 0.501 to 1.5, corresponding to synergistic, additive or indifferent effects. showed a greater tendency to create biofilm but these EOs at subinhibitory concentrations (sMIC) effectively blocked the adhesion and the establishment of biofilm. The exposure of both mycobacteria to MICs and sMICs lead to significant morphological changes: acquired a swollen form, ghost-like cell, disorganized cytoplasm detached from the cell wall. OD value of supernatant for both mycobacteria exposed to EOs have confirmed that there is a leakage of cellular material.

. The leakage of the cellular material is noticeably higher in sMIC, which is probably due to cell wall damage. sMIC of both EOs have an additive or synergistic effect, reducing MICs, limiting adhesion and preventing the formation of biofilms.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.000962
2019-05-01
2024-04-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jmm/68/5/703.html?itemId=/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.000962&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Falkinham JO, Pruden A, Edwards M. Opportunistic premise plumbing pathogens: increasingly important pathogens in drinking water. Pathogens 2015; 4:373–386 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Esteban J, García-Coca M. Mycobacterium Biofilms. Front Microbiol 2017; 8:2651 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Falkinham JO 3rd. Common features of opportunistic premise plumbing pathogens. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2015; 12:4533–4545 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Falkinham JO 3rd. Surrounded by mycobacteria: nontuberculous mycobacteria in the human environment. J Appl Microbiol 2009; 107:356–367 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bassolé IH, Juliani HR. Essential oils in combination and their antimicrobial properties. Molecules 2012; 17:3989–4006 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Hajdari A, Mustafa B, Nebija D, Miftari E, Quave CL et al. Chemical composition of Juniperus communis L. cone essential oil and its variability among wild populations in Kosovo. Chem Biodivers 2015; 12:1706–1717 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Peruč D, Gobin I, Abram M, Broznić D, Svalina T et al. Antimycobacterial potential of the juniper berry essential oil in tap water. Arh Hig Rada Toksikol 2018; 69:46–54 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Hoferl M, Stoilova I, Schmidt E, Wanner J, Jirovetz L et al. Chemical composition and antioxidant properties of Juniper berry (Juniperus communis L. essential oil. Action of the essential oil on the antioxidant protection of Saccharomyces cerevisiae model organism. Antioxidants 2014; 3:81–98
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Bais S, Gill NS, Rana N, Shandil S. A Phytopharmacological review on a medicinal plant: Juniperus communis. Int Sch Res Notices 2014; 2014:634723 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Antunes Viegas D, Palmeira-de-Oliveira A, Salgueiro L, Martinez-de-Oliveira J, Palmeira-de-Oliveira R. Helichrysum italicum: from traditional use to scientific data. J Ethnopharmacol 2014; 151:54–65 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Guinoiseau E, Lorenzi V, Luciani A, Muselli A, Costa J et al. Biological properties and resistance reversal effect of Helichrysum italicum (Roth) G. Don. In Méndez-Vilas A. editor Microbial Pathogens and Strategies for Combating Them: Science, Technology and Education Badajoz, Spain: Formatex Research Center; 2013 pp 1073–1080
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Sieniawska E, Sawicki R, Swatko-Ossor M, Napiorkowska A, Przekora A et al. The effect of combining natural terpenes and antituberculous agents against reference and clinical Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains. Molecules 2018; 23:176 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Webster D, Lee TD, Moore J, Manning T, Kunimoto D et al. Antimycobacterial screening of traditional medicinal plants using the microplate resazurin assay. Can J Microbiol 2010; 56:487–494 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Staver MM, Gobin I, Ratkaj I, Petrovic M, Vulinovic A et al. In vitro antiproliferative and antimicrobial activity of the essential oil from the flowers and leaves of Helichrysum italicum (Roth) G. Don growing in Central Dalmatia (Croatia). J Essent Oil Bear Pl 2018; 21:77–91 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Andréjak C, Almeida DV, Tyagi S, Converse PJ, Ammerman NC et al. Characterization of mouse models of Mycobacterium avium complex infection and evaluation of drug combinations. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2015; 59:2129–2135 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Sarker SD, Nahar L, Kumarasamy Y. Microtitre plate-based antibacterial assay incorporating resazurin as an indicator of cell growth, and its application in the in vitro antibacterial screening of phytochemicals. Methods 2007; 42:321–324 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. White RL, Burgess DS, Manduru M, Bosso JA. Comparison of three different in vitro methods of detecting synergy: time-kill, checkerboard, and E test. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1996; 40:1914–1918 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Balouiri M, Sadiki M, Ibnsouda SK. Methods for in vitro evaluating antimicrobial activity: A review. J Pharm Anal 2016; 6:71–79 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Bajpai VK, Sharma A, Baek KH. Antibacterial mode of action of the essential oil obtained from Chamaecyparis obtusa sawdust on the membrane integrity of selected foodborne pathogens. Food Technol Biotechnol 2014; 52:109–118
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Teanpaisan R, Kawsud P, Pahumunto N, Puripattanavong J. Screening for antibacterial and antibiofilm activity in Thai medicinal plant extracts against oral microorganisms. J Tradit Complement Med 2017; 7:172–177 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Vaerewijck MJ, Huys G, Palomino JC, Swings J, Portaels F. Mycobacteria in drinking water distribution systems: ecology and significance for human health. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2005; 29:911–934 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Hoefsloot W, van Ingen J, Andrejak C, Angeby K, Bauriaud R et al. The geographic diversity of nontuberculous mycobacteria isolated from pulmonary samples: an NTM-NET collaborative study. Eur Respir J 2013; 42:1604–1613 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Sawicki R, Golus J, Przekora A, Ludwiczuk A, Sieniawska E et al. Antimycobacterial activity of cinnamaldehyde in a Mycobacterium tuberculosis(H37Ra) Model. Molecules 2018; 23:2381 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Sieniawska E, Swatko-Ossor M, Sawicki R, Ginalska G. Morphological changes in the overall Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Ra cell shape and cytoplasm homogeneity due to Mutellina purpurea L. essential oil and its main constituents. Med Princ Pract 2015; 24:527–532 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Chouhan S, Sharma K, Guleria S. Antimicrobial activity of some essential Oils-Present status and future perspectives. Medicines 2017; 4:E58 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Reisner BS, Woods GL, Popov VL. Electron microscopic analysis of Mycobacterium avium complex isolates exposed to ciprofloxacin, rifabutin, ethambutol and clarithromycin. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 1997; 1:270–275
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Carter G, Wu M, Drummond DC, Bermudez LE. Characterization of biofilm formation by clinical isolates of Mycobacterium avium . J Med Microbiol 2003; 52:747–752 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Faria S, Joao I, Jordao L. General overview on nontuberculous mycobacteria, biofilms, and human infection. J Pathog 2015; 2015:1–10 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.000962
Loading
/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.000962
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error