1887

Abstract

To determine the effect of allicin on cell wall peptidoglycans by the application of MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry on whole cells and to relate this to current knowledge of wall-processing enzymes.

Two different strains were grown for 48 h after which period each culture was split into two, one part was then treated with sub-inhibitory levels of allicin while the other part left untreated as a control. After a further 24 h whole cells were recovered and analysed by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry.

Changes in the mass spectra between the treated and untreated cells revealed fragmented peptidoglycans identified by mass calculation only in the treated cells. These peptidoglycan fragments where identified as the products of specific peptidoglycan hydrolases.

Allicin is known to target cysteine thiol groups. These are absent in peptidoglycan hydrolases and we might have expected identical results in both of the treated and untreated cells. Peptidoglycan synthesis enzymes such as the Fem family of enzymes do contain cysteines. Fem enzymes A, B and X all have a conserved conformation of 99 % for over 100 strains and are therefore potential targets for allicin. Examination of FemA structure showed that cysteine102 is accessible from the surface. We propose that allicin has an inhibitory mechanism alongside others of targeting FemA and possibly other Fem enzymes by curtailing glycine bridging and leading to fragmentation. This study provided an insight into yet another antimicrobial mechanism of allicin.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.000950
2019-04-01
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jmm/68/4/667.html?itemId=/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.000950&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Chambers HF. The changing epidemiology of Staphylococcus aureus?. Emerg Infect Dis 2001; 7:178–182 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Palavecino E. Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections. Clin Lab Med 2004; 24:403–418 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Cutler RR, Wilson P. Antibacterial activity of a new, stable, aqueous extract of allicin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus . Br J Biomed Sci 2004; 61:71–74 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Ankri S, Miron T, Rabinkov A, Wilchek M, Mirelman D. Allicin from garlic strongly inhibits cysteine proteinases and cytopathic effects of Entamoeba histolytica. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1997; 41:2286–2288 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Rabinkov A, Miron T, Mirelman D, Wilchek M, Glozman S et al. S-Allylmercaptoglutathione: the reaction product of allicin with glutathione possesses SH-modifying and antioxidant properties. Biochim Biophys Acta 2000; 1499:144–153 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Cruz-Villalón G, Pérez-Giraldo C. Effect of allicin on the production of polysaccharide intercellular adhesin in Staphylococcus epidermidis . J Appl Microbiol 2011; 110:723–728 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Müller A, Eller J, Albrecht F, Prochnow P, Kuhlmann K et al. Allicin induces thiol stress in bacteria through S-Allylmercapto modification of protein cysteines. J Biol Chem 2016; 291:11477–11490 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Fujisawa H, Watanabe K, Suma K, Origuchi K, Matsufuji H et al. Antibacterial potential of garlic-derived allicin and its cancellation by sulfhydryl compounds. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 2009; 73:1948–1955 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Clark AE, Kaleta EJ, Arora A, Wolk DM. Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry: a fundamental shift in the routine practice of clinical microbiology. Clin Microbiol Rev 2013; 26:547–603 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Fujisawa H, Suma K, Origuchi K, Kumagai H, Seki T et al. Biological and chemical stability of garlic-derived allicin. J Agric Food Chem 2008; 56:4229–4235 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Rose AS, Hildebrand PW. NGL Viewer: a web application for molecular visualization. Nucleic Acids Res 2015; 43:W576–W579 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Rose AS, Bradley AR, Valasatava Y, Duarte JM, Prlić A. Web-based molecular graphics for large complexes. ACM Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Web3D Technology (Web3D '16); 2016 pp 185–186
  13. Singhal N, Kumar M, Kanaujia PK, Virdi JS. MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry: an emerging technology for microbial identification and diagnosis. Front Microbiol 2015; 6:791 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Cabrera JC, Van Cutsem P. Preparation of chitooligosaccharides with degree of polymerization higher than 6 by acid or enzymatic degradation of chitosan. Biochem Eng J 2005; 25:165–172 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Chen M, Zhu X, Li Z, Guo X, Ling P. Application of matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS) in preparation chitosan oligosaccharides (COS) with degree of polymerization (DP) 5–12 containing well-distributed acetyl groups. Int J Mass Spectrom 2010; 290:94–99 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Boneca IG, Huang ZH, Gage DA, Tomasz A. Characterization of Staphylococcus aureus cell wall glycan strands, evidence for a new β-N-acetylglucosaminidase activity. J Biol Chem 2000; 275:9910–9918 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Bera A, Herbert S, Jakob A, Vollmer W, Götz F. Why are pathogenic staphylococci so lysozyme resistant? the peptidoglycan O-acetyltransferase OatA is the major determinant for lysozyme resistance of Staphylococcus aureus . Mol Microbiol 2005; 55:778–787 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Bera A, Biswas R, Herbert S, Götz F. The presence of peptidoglycan O-acetyltransferase in various staphylococcal species correlates with lysozyme resistance and pathogenicity. Infect Immun 2006; 74:4598–4604 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Weadge JT, Pfeffer JM, Clarke AJ. Identification of a new family of enzymes with potential O-acetylpeptidoglycan esterase activity in both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. BMC Microbiol 2005; 5:49 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Sharif S, Kim SJ, Labischinski H, Schaefer J. Characterization of peptidoglycan in fem-deletion mutants of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus by solid-state NMR. Biochemistry 2009; 48:3100–3108 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Bernard E, Rolain T, Courtin P, Guillot A, Langella P et al. Characterization of O-acetylation of N-acetylglucosamine: a novel structural variation of bacterial peptidoglycan. J Biol Chem 2011; 286:23950–23958 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Dmitriev BA, Toukach FV, Schaper KJ, Holst O, Rietschel ET et al. Tertiary structure of bacterial murein: the scaffold model. J Bacteriol 2003; 185:3458–3468 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Vollmer W, Joris B, Charlier P, Foster S. Bacterial peptidoglycan (murein) hydrolases. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2008; 32:259–286 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Touhami A, Jericho MH, Beveridge TJ. Atomic force microscopy of cell growth and division in Staphylococcus aureus . J Bacteriol 2004; 186:3286–3295 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Meroueh SO, Bencze KZ, Hesek D, Lee M, Fisher JF et al. Three-dimensional structure of the bacterial cell wall peptidoglycan. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006; 103:4404–4409 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Miron T, Rabinkov A, Mirelman D, Wilchek M, Weiner L. The mode of action of allicin: its ready permeability through phospholipid membranes may contribute to its biological activity. Biochim Biophys Acta 2000; 1463:20–30 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Benson TE, Prince DB, Mutchler VT, Curry KA, Ho AM et al. X-ray crystal structure of Staphylococcus aureus FemA. Structure 2002; 10:1107–1115 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Kim SJ, Chang J, Singh M. Peptidoglycan architecture of Gram-positive bacteria by solid-state NMR. Biochim Biophys Acta 2015; 1848:350–362
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Daniels R, Mellroth P, Bernsel A, Neiers F, Normark S et al. Disulfide bond formation and cysteine exclusion in Gram-positive bacteria. J Biol Chem 2010; 285:3300–3309 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.000950
Loading
/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.000950
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error