Purpose. Despite being in clinical use for decades, colistin susceptibility testing remains challenging because of its inherent cationic properties. We aimed to compare the performance characteristics of different methods for testing susceptibility to colistin in a series of clinical isolates of Gram-negative bacilli.
Methodology. One hundred and nine clinical isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae (n=34), Escherichia coli (n=20), Acinetobacter baumannii (n=17) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n=38) were studied for colistin susceptibility using broth microdilution (BMID), broth macrodilution (BMAD), agar dilution (AD) as well as disc-diffusion (DD) utilizing two different commercial disc sources.
Results. By using BMID as reference method, 88 and 21 isolates were found to be colistin susceptible and resistant, respectively. Overall, acceptable essential agreement (EA) and categorical agreement (CA) were observed between BMAD and reference method (100 %). Whereas the AD method revealed the lowest rate of EA (61.7, 11.7, 5.0 and 5.2 % for K. pneumoniae, A. baumannii, E. coli and P. aeruginosa, respectively), it showed acceptable or near acceptable CA for K. pneumoniae (100 %), E. coli (100 %) and A. baumannii (88.2 %) isolates but not for P. aeruginosa (13.1 %). DD failed to detect resistance in colistin-resistant (colR) P. aeruginosa (n=5, very major errors of 100 %) but successfully identified all high-level colistin-resistant A. baumannii and K. pneumoniae isolates.
Conclusion. We found BMAD to be very reliable for colistin MIC determination. Methods AD and DD should not be used for colistin susceptibility testing in P. aeruginosa isolates as these are associated with false-resistant and -susceptible results, respectively.
OlaitanAO, MorandS, RolainJM. Mechanisms of polymyxin resistance: acquired and intrinsic resistance in bacteria. Front Microbiol2014; 5: [View Article][PubMed]
LiuYY, WangY, WalshTR, YiLX, ZhangR et al. Emergence of plasmid-mediated colistin resistance mechanism MCR-1 in animals and human beings in China: a microbiological and molecular biological study. Lancet Infect Dis2016; 16:161–168 [View Article][PubMed]
XavierBB, LammensC, RuhalR, Kumar-SinghS, ButayeP et al. Identification of a novel plasmid-mediated colistin-resistance gene, mcr-2, in Escherichia coli, Belgium, June 2016. Eurosurveillance2016; 21: [View Article][PubMed]
GalaniI, KontopidouF, SouliM, RekatsinaPD, KoratzanisE et al. Colistin susceptibility testing by Etest and disk diffusion methods. Int J Antimicrob Agents2008; 31:434–439 [View Article][PubMed]
MaalejSM, MeziouMR, RhimiFM, HammamiA. Comparison of disc diffusion, Etest and agar dilution for susceptibility testing of colistin against Enterobacteriaceae. Lett Appl Microbiol2011; 53:546–551 [View Article][PubMed]
PiewngamP, KiratisinP. Comparative assessment of antimicrobial susceptibility testing for tigecycline and colistin against Acinetobacter baumannii clinical isolates, including multidrug-resistant isolates. Int J Antimicrob Agents2014; 44:396–401 [View Article][PubMed]
LeeSY, ShinJH, LeeK, JooMY, ParkKH et al. Comparison of the Vitek 2, MicroScan, and Etest methods with the agar dilution method in assessing colistin susceptibility of bloodstream isolates of Acinetobacter species from a Korean university hospital. J Clin Microbiol2013; 51:1924–1926 [View Article][PubMed]
Lo-Ten-FoeJR, de SmetAM, DiederenBM, KluytmansJA, van KeulenPH. Comparative evaluation of the VITEK 2, disk diffusion, etest, broth microdilution, and agar dilution susceptibility testing methods for colistin in clinical isolates, including heteroresistant Enterobacter cloacae and Acinetobacter baumannii strains. Antimicrob Agents Chemother2007; 51:3726–3730 [View Article][PubMed]
HaeiliM, KafshdouzM, FeizabadiMM. Molecular Mechanisms of Colistin Resistance Among Pandrug-Resistant Isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii with High Case-Fatality Rate in Intensive Care Unit Patients. Microb Drug Resist2018 [View Article][PubMed]
Jorgensen JHPM, CarrollKC, FunkeG, LandryML, RichterSS et al.Manual of Clinical Microbiology, 11th ed. Washington, DC: American Society of Microbiology; 2015
TurtonJF, WoodfordN, GloverJ, YardeS, KaufmannME et al. Identification of Acinetobacter baumannii by detection of the blaOXA-51-like carbapenemase gene intrinsic to this species. J Clin Microbiol2006; 44:2974–2976 [View Article][PubMed]
WiegandI, HilpertK, HancockRE. Agar and broth dilution methods to determine the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of antimicrobial substances. Nat Protoc2008; 3:163–175 [View Article][PubMed]
Standardization IOfClinical Laboratory Testing and in Vitro Diagnostic Test Systems— Susceptibility Testing of Infectious Agents and Evaluation of Performance of Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test Devices—part 2: Evaluation of Performance of Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test Devices International Organization for Standardization:ISO; 2007
KarvanenM, MalmbergC, LagerbäckP, FribergLE, CarsO. Colistin Is Extensively Lost during Standard In Vitro Experimental Conditions. Antimicrob Agents Chemother2017; 61:e0085700817 [View Article][PubMed]
BradfordPA, KazmierczakKM, BiedenbachDJ, WiseMG, HackelM et al. Colistin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae: correlation of β-lactamase production and colistin resistance among isolates from a global surveillance program. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2015AAC. 01870–01815
GalesAC, ReisAO, JonesRN. Contemporary assessment of antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods for polymyxin B and colistin: review of available interpretative criteria and quality control guidelines. J Clin Microbiol2001; 39:183–190 [View Article][PubMed]