Preview this article:
Zoom in

Etest to detect drug-resistant to contemporary treatment; methodological issues concerning accuracy and reproducibility, Page 1 of 1

| /docserver/preview/fulltext/jmm/67/4/465_jmm000705-1.gif

There is no abstract available for this article.
Use the preview function to the left.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...



  1. Papp JR, Rowlinson MC, O'Connor NP, Wholehan J, Razeq JH et al. Accuracy and reproducibility of the Etest to detect drug-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae to contemporary treatment. J Med Microbiol 2018;67:68–73 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Szklo M, Nieto FJ. Epidemiology Beyond the Basics, 2nd ed. Manhattan, New York, United State: Jones and Bartlett Publisher; 2007
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Sabour S, Ghassemi F. Accuracy and reproducibility of the ETDRS visual acuity chart: methodological issues. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2016;254:2073–2074 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Sabour S. Validity and reliability of the 13C-methionine breath test for the detection of moderate hyperhomocysteinemia in Mexican adults; statistical issues in validity and reliability analysis. Clin Chem Lab Med 2014;52:e295-6 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Sabour S. Microscopy and culture for the diagnosis of gonorrhea methodological issues on validity and reliability. Sex Transm Dis 2017;44:318 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]

Most cited this month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error