1887

Abstract

Purpose. Urine flow cytometry (UFC) is an automated method to quantify bacterial and white blood cell (WBC) counts. We aimed to determine whether a threshold for these parameters can be set to use UFC as a sensitive screen to predict which urine samples will subsequently grow in culture.

Methodology. Urines submitted to our microbiology laboratory at a tertiary care centre from 22 July 2015–17 February 2016 underwent UFC (Sysmex UF-1000i) analysis, regular urinalysis and urine culture. Positive urine cultures were defined as growth ≥10 c.f.u. ml of organisms associated with urinary tract infections. The correlation of UFC bacterial and WBC counts with urine culture was assessed using receiver operating characteristics curves. The sensitivity (SN), specificity (SP), negative predictive values (NPVs), positive predictive values (PPVs) and false negative rate (FNR) were calculated at various thresholds in immunocompetent and immunosuppressed patients.

Results. A total of 15 046 urine specimens were submitted, of which 14 908 were analysable in the study. The average time to UFC result from receipt in the laboratory was 0.76 h (+/−1.04). The test performance at a set threshold of UFC bacteria ≥20 or WBC >5 was: SN=96.0 %, SP=39.2 %, PPV=47.0 %, NPV=94.5 % and FNR=4.0 %. This threshold eliminates 26 % of urine cultures. Immunosuppressed hosts had a lower sensitivity of 90.6 % and a higher FNR of 9.4 %.

Conclusions. UFC is a rapid and sensitive method to screen out urine samples that will subsequently be negative and to reflex urines to culture that will subsequently grow. UFC results are available within 1 h from receipt and enable the elimination of culture when the set threshold is not met.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.000572
2017-09-04
2019-10-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jmm/66/9/1308.html?itemId=/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.000572&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Wilson ML, Gaido L. Laboratory diagnosis of urinary tract infections in adult patients. Clin Infect Dis 2004;38:1150–1158 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Brezmes MF, Ochoa C, Eiros JM. Cost analysis in a clinical microbiology laboratory. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2002;21:582–588 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Kelly MT, Balfour LC. Evaluation and optimization of urine screening by Autobac. J Clin Microbiol 1981;13:677–680[PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Devillé WL, Yzermans JC, van Duijn NP, Bezemer PD, van der Windt DA et al. The urine dipstick test useful to rule out infections. A meta-analysis of the accuracy. BMC Urol 2004;4:4 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. St John A, Boyd JC, Lowes AJ, Price CP. The use of urinary dipstick tests to exclude urinary tract infection: a systematic review of the literature. Am J Clin Pathol 2006;126:428–436 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Sacks TG, Abramson JH. Screening tests for bacteriuria. A validity study. JAMA 1967;201:79–82 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Smith TK, Hudson AJ, Spencer RC. Evaluation of six screening methods for detecting significant bacteriuria. J Clin Pathol 1988;41:904–909 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Tilton RE, Tilton RC. Automated direct antimicrobial susceptibility testing of microscopically screened urine cultures. J Clin Microbiol 1980;11:157–161[PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Nicolle LE, Bradley S, Colgan R, Rice JC, Schaeffer A et al. Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria in adults. Clin Infect Dis 2005;40:643–654 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. McIsaac WJ, Hunchak CL. Overestimation error and unnecessary antibiotic prescriptions for acute cystitis in adult women. Med Decis Making 2011;31:405–411 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Bent S, Nallamothu BK, Simel DL, Fihn SD, Saint S. Does this woman have an acute uncomplicated urinary tract infection?. JAMA 2002;287:2701–2710 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Jones CW, Culbreath KD, Mehrotra A, Gilligan PH. Reflect urine culture cancellation in the emergency department. J Emerg Med 2014;46:71–76 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Kayalp D, Dogan K, Ceylan G, Senes M, Yucel D. Can routine automated urinalysis reduce culture requests?. Clin Biochem 2013;46:1285–1289 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Reilly P, Mills L, Bessmer D, Jimenez C, Simpson P et al. Using the urine dipstick to screen out unnecessary urine cultures: implementation at one facility. Clin Lab Sci 2002;15:9–12[PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Patel HD, Livsey SA, Swann RA, Bukhari SS. Can urine dipstick testing for urinary tract infection at point of care reduce laboratory workload?. J Clin Pathol 2005;58:951–954 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Gieteling E, van de Leur JJ, Stegeman CA, Groeneveld PH. Accurate and fast diagnostic algorithm for febrile urinary tract infections in humans. Neth J Med 2014;72:356–362[PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. De Rosa R, Grosso S, Bruschetta G, Avolio M, Stano P et al. Evaluation of the Sysmex UF1000i flow cytometer for ruling out bacterial urinary tract infection. Clin Chim Acta 2010;411:1137–1142 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Wang J, Zhang Y, Xu D, Shao W, Lu Y. Evaluation of the Sysmex UF-1000i for the diagnosis of urinary tract infection. Am J Clin Pathol 2010;133:577–582 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Manoni F, Fornasiero L, Ercolin M, Tinello A, Ferrian M et al. Cutoff values for bacteria and leukocytes for urine flow cytometer Sysmex UF-1000i in urinary tract infections. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2009;65:103–107 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Pieretti B, Brunati P, Pini B, Colzani C, Congedo P et al. Diagnosis of bacteriuria and leukocyturia by automated flow cytometry compared with urine culture. J Clin Microbiol 2010;48:3990–3996 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. van der Zwet WC, Hessels J, Canbolat F, Deckers MM. Evaluation of the Sysmex UF-1000i® urine flow cytometer in the diagnostic work-up of suspected urinary tract infection in a Dutch general hospital. Clin Chem Lab Med 2010;48:1765–1771 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Broeren MA, Bahçeci S, Vader HL, Arents NL. Screening for urinary tract infection with the Sysmex UF-1000i urine flow cytometer. J Clin Microbiol 2011;49:1025–1029 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Kadkhoda K, Manickam K, Degagne P, Sokolowski P, Pang P et al. UF-1000i flow cytometry is an effective screening method for urine specimens. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2011;69:130–136 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Marschal M, Wienke M, Hoering S, Autenrieth IB, Frick JS. Evaluation of 3 different rapid automated systems for diagnosis of urinary tract infections. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2012;72:125–130 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Gutiérrez-Fernández J, Lara A, Bautista MF, de Dios Luna J, Polo P et al. Performance of the Sysmex UF1000i system in screening for significant bacteriuria before quantitative culture of aerobic/facultative fast-growth bacteria in a reference hospital. J Appl Microbiol 2012;113:609–614 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Le Z, Li F, Fei C, Ye A, Xie X et al. Performance of the Sysmex UF-1000i urine analyser in the rapid diagnosis of urinary tract infections in hospitalized patients. J Infect Chemother 2016;22:377–382 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Shang YJ, Wang QQ, Zhang JR, Xu YL, Zhang WW et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of flow cytometry in urinary tract infection screening. Clin Chim Acta 2013;424:90–95 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Origüen J, Fernández-Ruiz M, López-Medrano F, Ruiz-Merlo T, González E et al. Progressive increase of resistance in Enterobacteriaceae urinary isolates from kidney transplant recipients over the past decade: narrowing of the therapeutic options. Transpl Infect Dis 2016;18:575–584 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Origüen J, López-Medrano F, Fernández-Ruiz M, Polanco N, Gutiérrez E et al. Should asymptomatic bacteriuria be systematically treated in kidney transplant recipients? Results from a randomized controlled trial. Am J Transplant 2016;16:2943–2953 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.000572
Loading
/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.000572
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error