1887

Abstract

The standard approach to screening sexually transmitted infections (STIs) has often been restricted to urogenital specimens. Most current guidelines, however, also recommend testing extra-genital sites, including rectal locations, because asymptomatic rectal carriage of pathogens has often been reported. The aim of our study was to evaluate self-collected rectal swabs to screen bacterial STIs in HIV-infected patients in Marseille, France.

Between January 2014 and December 2015, 118 HIV-infected patients (93 males and 25 females) agreed to self-sample anal swabs for detection of bacterial STI. Detection of , , , and was performed using in-house qPCR assay.

Bacterial STIs were found in 8 % (9/118) of the patients. was the most commonly detected bacterium (4.2 %) followed by (2.5 %), (1.7 %) and (0.8 %). All the positive patients were males. The rectal carriage of pathogenic bacteria was fortuitously discovered for seven men (78 %) who did not present rectal signs of STIs and was suspected for two men who presented proctitis (22 %).

In conclusion, testing extra-genital sites is crucial for the diagnosis of STIs in men and women presenting or not concomitant urogenital infections in order to detect asymptomatic carriage with the aim of controlling and preventing transmission to their sexual partners.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.000481
2017-06-01
2024-04-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jmm/66/6/693.html?itemId=/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.000481&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Colson P, Gouriet F, Badiaga S, Tamalet C, Stein A et al. Real-time laboratory surveillance of sexually-transmissible infections in Marseille university hospitals reveals rise of gonorrhoea, syphilis and human immunodeficiency virus seroconversions in 2012. Euro Surveill 2013; 18:4[PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Savage EJ, Van de Laar MJ, Gallay A, Van der Sande M, Hamouda O et al. Lymphogranuloma venereum in Europe, 2003–2008.. Euro Surveill 2009; 14:48
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Wilkin T. Clinical practice. Primary care for men who have sex with men. N Engl J Med 2015; 373:854–862 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Dukers-Muijrers NH, Schachter J, Van Liere GA, Wolffs PF, Hoebe CJ. What is needed to guide testing for anorectal and pharyngeal Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in women and men? Evidence and opinion. BMC Infect Dis 2015; 15:533 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Workowski KA, Bolan GA. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2015. MMWR Recomm Rep 2015; 64:1–137[PubMed] [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Chan PA, Robinette A, Montgomery M, Almonte A, Cu-Uvin S et al. Extragenital infections caused by Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae: a review of the literature. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol 2016; 2016:1–17 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Morel AS, Dubourg G, Prudent E, Edouard S, Gouriet F et al. Complementarity between targeted real-time specific PCR and conventional broad-range 16S rDNA PCR in the syndrome-driven diagnosis of infectious diseases. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2015; 34:561–570 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Tamalet C, Ravaux I, Dhiver C, Menard A, Colson P et al. Feasibility and acceptability of anal self-sampling for human papillomavirus screening in HIV-infected patients. Intervirology 2016; 59:118–122 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Sultan B, White JA, Fish R, Carrick G, Brima N et al. The "3 in 1" study: pooling self-taken pharyngeal, urethral, and rectal samples into a single sample for analysis for detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis in men who have sex with men. J Clin Microbiol 2016; 54:650–656 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Wayal S, Llewellyn C, Smith H, Hankins M, Phillips A et al. Self-sampling for oropharyngeal and rectal specimens to screen for sexually transmitted infections: acceptability among men who have sex with men. Sex Transm Infect 2009; 85:60–64 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Musil K, Currie M, Sherley M, Martin S. Rectal chlamydia infection in women at high risk of chlamydia attending Canberra Sexual Health Centre. Int J STD AIDS 2016; 27:526–530 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Ding A, Challenor R. Rectal chlamydia in heterosexual women: more questions than answers. Int J STD AIDS 2014; 25:587–592 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Zheng BJ, Yin YP, Han Y, Shi MQ, Jiang N et al. The prevalence of urethral and rectal Mycoplasma genitalium among men who have sex with men in China, a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health 2014; 14:195 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Lillis RA, Nsuami MJ, Myers L, Martin DH. Utility of urine, vaginal, cervical, and rectal specimens for detection of Mycoplasma genitalium in women. J Clin Microbiol 2011; 49:1990–1992 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Gopal P, Shah RB. Primary anal canal syphilis in men: the clinicopathologic spectrum of an easily overlooked diagnosis. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2015; 139:1156–1160 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Schmid G, Steen R, N'Dowa F. Control of bacterial sexually transmitted diseases in the developing world is possible. Clin Infect Dis 2005; 41:1313–1315 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Trebach JD, Chaulk CP, Page KR, Tuddenham S, Ghanem KG. Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis among women reporting extragenital exposures. Sex Transm Dis 2015; 42:233–239 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Philibert P, Khiri H, Pénaranda G, Camus C, Drogoul MP et al. High prevalence of asymptomatic sexually transmitted infections among men who have sex with men. J Clin Med 2014; 3:1386–1391 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Gratrix J, Singh AE, Bergman J, Egan C, Plitt SS et al. Evidence for increased Chlamydia case finding after the introduction of rectal screening among women attending 2 Canadian sexually transmitted infection clinics. Clin Infect Dis 2015; 60:398–404 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Andersson N, Boman J, Nylander E. Rectal chlamydia – should screening be recommended in women?. Int J STD AIDS 2017; 28:476–479 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Fuchs W, Kreuter A, Hellmich M, Potthoff A, Swoboda J et al. Asymptomatic anal sexually transmitted infections in HIV-positive men attending anal cancer screening. Br J Dermatol 2016; 174:831–838 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Chow EP, Camilleri S, Ward C, Huffam S, Chen MY et al. Duration of gonorrhoea and chlamydia infection at the pharynx and rectum among men who have sex with men: a systematic review. Sex Health 2016; 13:199–204 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Nyatsanza F, Trivedy A, Brook G. The effect of introducing routine self-taken extra-genital swabs in a genitourinary medicine clinic cohort: a before and after study. Int J STD AIDS 2016; 27:1330–1333 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Nall J, Barr B, Mcneil CJ, Bachmann LH. Implementation of oral and rectal gonococcal and chlamydial nucleic acid amplification-based testing as a component of local health department activities. Sex Transm Dis 2016; 43:605–607 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Kriesel JD, Bhatia AS, Barrus C, Vaughn M, Gardner J et al. Multiplex PCR testing for nine different sexually transmitted infections. Int J STD AIDS 2016; 27:1275–1282 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.000481
Loading
/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.000481
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary File 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error