1887

Abstract

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are clinically important problems that lead to serious morbidity and mortality, and indwelling urinary catheters are a major factor of UTIs. In this study, we applied clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) genome editing to generate ΔluxS mutant strains from clinical isolates of Escherichia coli SE15, which is one of major pathogens and can cause colonization and biofilm formation in the catheter. A major regulatory pathway of such biofilm formation on medical devices is the quorum sensing mechanism via small molecule autoinducer-2 synthesized by LuxS enzyme. Here, we used the CRISPR-Cas9 system for precise deletion of luxS gene in clinical isolate E. coli SE15. To this end, we constructed a donor DNA for homologous recombination to delete 93 bases in the chromosomal target (luxS) and observed the success rate of luxS deletion to be 22.7 %. We conducted biofilm assay to observe decreased biofilm formation in the E. coil SE15 ΔluxS mutants compared to wild-type E. coil SE15. Quantitative real-time PCR analysis of E. coil SE15 ΔluxS mutants showed that the expression of luxS was below detection level. We also observed that the relative mRNA levels of biofilm-formation-related genes, such as mqsR, pgaBC and csgEF, were significantly decreased in E. coil SE15 ΔluxS mutants compared to wild-type. We conclude that genome editing by CRISPR-Cas9 system is an effective tool to dissect the molecular mechanism of biofilm formation in medically important strains, and the study may serve as a basis for developing novel medical intervention against UTIs caused by biofilm.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.000406
2017-02-06
2019-10-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jmm/66/1/18.html?itemId=/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.000406&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Hartstein AI, Garber SB, Ward TT, Jones SR, Morthland VH. Nosocomial urinary tract infection: a prospective evaluation of 108 catheterized patients. Infect Control 1981;2:380–386 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Sitnikov DM, Schineller JB, Baldwin TO. Control of cell division in Escherichia coli: regulation of transcription of ftsQA involves both rpoS and SdiA-mediated autoinduction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996;93:336–341 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Stamm WE. Catheter-associated urinary tract infections: epidemiology, pathogenesis, and prevention. Am J Med 1991;91:S65–S71 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Macleod SM, Stickler DJ. Species interactions in mixed-community crystalline biofilms on urinary catheters. J Med Microbiol 2007;56:1549–1557 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Kucheria R, Dasgupta P, Sacks SH, Khan MS, Sheerin NS. Urinary tract infections: new insights into a common problem. Postgrad Med J 2005;81:83 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Azevedo AS, Almeida C, Melo LF, Azevedo NF. Interaction between atypical microorganisms and E. coli in catheter-associated urinary tract biofilms. Biofouling 2014;30:893–902 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Reisner A, Maierl M, Jörger M, Krause R, Berger D et al. Type 1 fimbriae contribute to catheter-associated urinary tract infections caused by Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 2014;196:931–939 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Sturbelle RT, de Avila LF, Roos TB, Borchardt JL, da Conceição RC et al. The role of quorum sensing in Escherichia coli (ETEC) virulence factors. Vet Microbiol 2015;180:245–252 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Ahmer BM. Cell-to-cell signalling in Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica. Mol Microbiol 2004;52:933–945 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. de Keersmaecker SC, Sonck K, Vanderleyden J. Let LuxS speak up in AI-2 signaling. Trends Microbiol 2006;14:114–119 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. van Houdt R, Aertsen A, Moons P, Vanoirbeek K, Michiels CW. N-acyl-l-homoserine lactone signal interception by Escherichia coli. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2006;256:83–89 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Vendeville A, Winzer K, Heurlier K, Tang CM, Hardie KR. Making 'sense' of metabolism: autoinducer-2, LuxS and pathogenic bacteria. Nat Rev Microbiol 2005;3:383–396 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. González Barrios AF, Zuo R, Hashimoto Y, Yang L, Bentley WE et al. Autoinducer 2 controls biofilm formation in Escherichia coli through a novel motility quorum-sensing regulator (MqsR, B3022). J Bacteriol 2006;188:305–316 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Esvelt KM, Wang HH. Genome-scale engineering for systems and synthetic biology. Mol Syst Biol 2013;9:641 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Sung CK, Li H, Claverys JP, Morrison DA. An rpsL cassette, janus, for gene replacement through negative selection in Streptococcus pneumoniae. Appl Environ Microbiol 2001;67:5190–5196 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Bae T, Schneewind O. Allelic replacement in Staphylococcus aureus with inducible counter-selection. Plasmid 2006;55:58–63 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Sharan SK, Thomason LC, Kuznetsov SG, Court DL. Recombineering: a homologous recombination-based method of genetic engineering. Nat Protoc 2009;4:206–223 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Hsu PD, Lander ES, Zhang F. Development and applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for genome engineering. Cell 2014;157:1262–1278 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Cong L, Ran FA, Cox D, Lin S, Barretto R et al. Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems. Science 2013;339:819–823 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Jiang W, Bikard D, Cox D, Zhang F, Marraffini LA. RNA-guided editing of bacterial genomes using CRISPR-Cas systems. Nat Biotechnol 2013;31:233–239 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Dicarlo JE, Norville JE, Mali P, Rios X, Aach J et al. Genome engineering in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using CRISPR-Cas systems. Nucleic Acids Res 2013;41:4336–4343 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Cobb RE, Wang Y, Zhao H. High-efficiency multiplex genome editing of Streptomyces species using an engineered CRISPR/Cas system. ACS Synth Biol 2015;4:723–728 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Cho SW, Kim S, Kim JM, Kim JS. Targeted genome engineering in human cells with the Cas9 RNA-guided endonuclease. Nat Biotechnol 2013;31:230–232 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Hur JK, Kim K, Been KW, Baek G, Ye S et al. Targeted mutagenesis in mice by electroporation of Cpf1 ribonucleoproteins. Nat Biotechnol 2016;34:807–808 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Hwang WY, Fu Y, Reyon D, Maeder ML, Tsai SQ et al. Efficient genome editing in zebrafish using a CRISPR-Cas system. Nat Biotechnol 2013;31:227–229 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Deltcheva E, Chylinski K, Sharma CM, Gonzales K, Chao Y et al. CRISPR RNA maturation by trans-encoded small RNA and host factor RNase III. Nature 2011;471:602–607 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Mojica FJ, Díez-Villaseñor C, García-Martínez J, Almendros C. Short motif sequences determine the targets of the prokaryotic CRISPR defence system. Microbiology 2009;155:733–740 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Jinek M, Chylinski K, Fonfara I, Hauer M, Doudna JA et al. A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science 2012;337:816–821 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Mali P, Yang L, Esvelt KM, Aach J, Guell M et al. RNA-guided human genome engineering via Cas9. Science 2013;339:823–826 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Shan Q, Wang Y, Li J, Gao C. Genome editing in rice and wheat using the CRISPR/Cas system. Nat Protoc 2014;9:2395–2410 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Choi HA. Mechanism associated autoinducer synthesis and virulence factor by luxS mutant Escherichia coli isolated from indwelling catheter Master's Thesis Kyonggi University; 2010
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Jiang Y, Chen B, Duan C, Sun B, Yang J et al. Multigene editing in the Escherichia coli genome via the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Appl Environ Microbiol 2015;81:2506–2514 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. O'Toole GA. Microtiter dish biofilm formation assay. J Vis Exp 2011;2437 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Wang HH, Xu G, Vonner AJ, Church G. Modified bases enable high-efficiency oligonucleotide-mediated allelic replacement via mismatch repair evasion. Nucleic Acids Res 2011;39:7336–7347 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Qi LS, Larson MH, Gilbert LA, Doudna JA, Weissman JS et al. Repurposing CRISPR as an RNA-guided platform for sequence-specific control of gene expression. Cell 2013;152:1173–1183 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Li J, Attila C, Wang L, Wood TK, Valdes JJ et al. Quorum sensing in Escherichia coli is signaled by AI-2/LsrR: effects on small RNA and biofilm architecture. J Bacteriol 2007;189:6011–6020 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Trautner BW, Darouiche RO. Role of biofilm in catheter-associated urinary tract infection. Am J Infect Control 2004;32:177–183 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Niu C. The role of autoinducer-2 in Escherichia coli biofilm formation and the discovery of a plant-derived quorum sensing inhibitor PhD thesis Georgia State University; 2006
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Xavier KB, Bassler BL. LuxS quorum sensing: more than just a numbers game. Curr Opin Microbiol 2003;6:191–197[PubMed][CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Ren D, Bedzyk LA, Ye RW, Thomas SM, Wood TK. Stationary-phase quorum-sensing signals affect autoinducer-2 and gene expression in Escherichia coli. Appl Environ Microbiol 2004;70:2038–2043 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  41. González Barrios AF, Zuo R, Hashimoto Y, Yang L, Bentley WE et al. Autoinducer 2 controls biofilm formation in Escherichia coli through a novel motility quorum-sensing regulator (MqsR, B3022). J Bacteriol 2006;188:305–316 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Ren D, Sims JJ, Wood TK. Inhibition of biofilm formation and swarming of Escherichia coli by (5Z)-4-bromo-5-(bromomethylene)-3-butyl-2(5H)-furanone. Environ Microbiol 2001;3:731–736 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Sambrook J, Russell DW. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory; 2001
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.000406
Loading
/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.000406
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error