1887

Abstract

Rapid identification of bacteria isolated from blood cultures by direct matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) is now in widespread use in major centres but is not yet feasible in smaller hospital laboratories. A FilmArray multiplex PCR panel for blood culture isolate identification (BCID) provides an alternative approach to near point-of-care microbial identification in regional hospitals. We assessed the accuracy and time to identification of the BCID FilmArray in a consecutive series of 149 blood cultures from 143 patients in a teaching hospital and smaller regional hospitals, currently identified by direct MALDI-TOF and proprietary molecular methods. The BCID FilmArray contained 18 of 34 species and 20 of 23 species isolated from teaching and regional hospital, respectively. Overall, 85 % of the teaching hospital and 100 % of the regional hospital monomicrobial blood cultures were identified, compared with 60 and 68 %, respectively, for direct MALDI-TOF on the same cultures. There were no incorrect results from blood cultures containing , streptococci, or . The three discrepant results were all in mixed cultures. The mean reduction in time to identification of blood culture isolates was 53 h, which did not include the time required to transport cultures from regional centres to a central laboratory. The overall performance of the BCID FilmArray is stronger in blood cultures from smaller regional hospitals that encounter a narrower range of bacterial species dominated by the commonest species. This approach is more suited to smaller clinical laboratories than the MALDI-TOF direct method.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.000194
2016-01-01
2024-12-07
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jmm/65/1/56.html?itemId=/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.000194&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Altun O., Almuhayawi M., Ullberg M., Ozenci V. 2013; Clinical evaluation of the FilmArray blood culture identification panel in identification of bacteria and yeasts from positive blood culture bottles. J Clin Microbiol 51:4130–4136 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Chaudhary T., Hohenstein C., Bayer O. 2014; [The golden hour of sepsis: initial therapy should start in the prehospital setting]. Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed 109:104–108 (in German) [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Dark P., Blackwood B., Gates S., McAuley D., Perkins G. D., McMullan R., Wilson C., Graham D., Timms K., Warhurst G. 2015; Accuracy of LightCycler® SeptiFast for the detection and identification of pathogens in the blood of patients with suspected sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med 41:21–33 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Huttunen R., Syrjänen J., Vuento R., Aittoniemi J. 2013; Current concepts in the diagnosis of blood stream infections. Are novel molecular methods useful in clinical practice?. Int J Infect Dis 17:e934–e938 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Inglis T. J., Hodge M., Ketharanathan S. 2008; A hospital-wide study of the impact of introducing a personal data assistant-augmented blood culture round. J Med Microbiol 57:43–49 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Inglis T. J. J., Merritt A. J., Bzdyl N., Lansley S., Urosevic N. M. 2015; First bacteraemic human infection with Escherichia albertii . New Microbes New Infect (in press)
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Kumar A., Roberts D., Wood K. E., Light B., Parrillo J. E., Sharma S., Suppes R., Feinstein D., Zanotti S., Taiberg L., Gurka D., Kumar A., Cheang M. 2006; Duration of hypotension before initiation of effective antimicrobial therapy is the critical determinant of survival in human septic shock. Crit Care Med 34:1589–1596 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Martinez R. M., Bauerle E. R., Fang F. C., Butler-Wu S. M. 2014; Evaluation of three rapid diagnostic methods for direct identification of microorganisms in positive blood cultures. J Clin Microbiol 52:2521–2529 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Martiny D., Debaugnies F., Gateff D., Gérard M., Aoun M., Martin C., Konopnicki D., Loizidou A., Georgala A., other authors. 2013; Impact of rapid microbial identification directly from positive blood cultures using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry on patient management. Clin Microbiol Infect 19:E568–E581 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Morgenthaler N. G., Kostrzewa M. 2015; Rapid identification of pathogens in positive blood culture of patients with sepsis: review and meta-analysis of the performance of the sepsityper kit. Int J Microbiol 2015:827416 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Rand K. H., Delano J. P. 2014; Direct identification of bacteria in positive blood cultures: comparison of two rapid methods, FilmArray and mass spectrometry. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 79:293–297 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Schmitz R. P., Keller P. M., Baier M., Hagel S., Pletz M. W., Brunkhorst F. M. 2013; Quality of blood culture testing – a survey in intensive care units and microbiological laboratories across four European countries. Crit Care 17:R248 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Southern T. R., VanSchooneveld T. C., Bannister D. L., Brown T. L., Crismon A. S., Buss S. N., Iwen P. C., Fey P. D. 2015; Implementation and performance of the BioFire FilmArray® Blood Culture Identification panel with antimicrobial treatment recommendations for bloodstream infections at a midwestern academic tertiary hospital. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 81:96–101 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.000194
Loading
/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.000194
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error