1887

Abstract

SUMMARY

Examination of bovine serum samples submitted from the field in connexion with the Brucellosis Eradication Scheme showed the value of immunodiffusion tests made with a diethyl ether-water extract of a smooth virulent strain of

Sera from cattle vaccinated with the killed strain-45/20 adjuvant vaccine frequently gave appreciable reactions when examined by standard tests, namely the serum agglutination, complement fixation and Rose Bengal plate tests. When these reactions were weak, the immunodiffusion test usually gave one or more precipitation lines, but these were formed only against sub-surface antigens. When these reactions were strong enough to suggest natural infection, a line against the smooth surface lipopolysaccharide antigen was present in addition. Infrequently, a similar line occurred in the absence of significant reactions to the standard tests.

Sera from cattle vaccinated with living strain 19 less frequently gave appreciable reactions in the standard tests. When the reactions were weak, immunoprecipitation lines were often formed against the sub-surface antigens but seldom against the lipopolysaccharide; when they were stronger, a line against the lipopolysaccharide was usually formed in addition.

Sera from unvaccinated cattle usually gave negative results in all tests, but several that gave marked reactions in the standard tests also gave precipitation lines with the sub-surface antigens and the lipopolysaccharide antigen. One sample gave two lines with sub-surface antigens, but was otherwise negative.

In immunodiffusion tests with sodium dodecyl sulphate extracts of the rough strain 45/20 a single precipitation arc was formed with some but not all of the sera that gave marked reactions in the standard tests.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-6-1-67
1973-02-01
2022-01-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jmm/6/1/medmicro-6-1-67.html?itemId=/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-6-1-67&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Anderson R. K., Jenness R., Brumfield, Helene P., Gough L., Patricia. 1964; Brucella-agglutinating antibodies: relation of mercaptoethanol stability to complement fixation. Science, N,. Y 143:1334
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Buck J. M. 1930; Studies of vaccination during calfhood to prevent bovine infectious abortion. J. Agric. Res 41:667
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Corbel M. J. 1972; Characterisation of antibodies active in the Rose Bengal plate test. Vet. Rec 90:484
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Corbel M. J., Cullen G. A. 1970; Differentiation of the serological response to Yersinia enterocolitica and Brucella abortus in cattle. J. Hyg., Camb 68:519
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Diaz R., Jones, Lois M., Leong D., Wilson J. B. 1967; Differences between Brucella antigens involved in indirect hemagglutination tests with normal and tanned red blood cells. J. Bad 94:499
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Diaz R., Jones, Lois M., Leong D., Wilson J. B. 1968; Surface antigens of smooth brucellae. J. Bact 96:893
    [Google Scholar]
  7. McEwen A. D., Roberts R. S. 1936; Bovine contagious abortion. The use of guinea- pigs in immunisation studies. J. Comp. Path. Ther 49:97
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Morgan W. J. B., Mackinnon D. J., Gill K. P. W., Gower S. G. M., Norris P. I. W. 1971; Standard laboratory techniques for the diagnosis of brucellosis. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Ribi E., Milner K. C., Perrine T. D. 1959; Endotoxic and antigenic fractions from the cell wall of Salmonella enteritidis. Methods for separation and some biologic activities. J. Immun 82:75
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Rice C. E., Tailyour J., Cochrane D. 1966; Ultracentrifugal studies of sera from cattle vaccinated or naturally infected with Brucella abortus . Canad. J. Comp. Med 30:270
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Rose J. E., Amerault T. E. 1964; Electrophoretic and ultracentrifugation studies on serum from pregnant heifers after exposure to virulent Brucella abortus . Amer. J. Vet. Res 25:998
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Schimmel D., Erler W. 1967; Characterization of agglutinins of cattle serum against Brucella abortus . Amer. J. Vet. Res 28:1919
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Sterne M., Trim, Gladys, Broughton E. S. 1971; Immunisation of laboratory animals and cattle with non-agglutinogenic extracts of Brucella abortus strain 45/20. J. Med, Microbiol 4:185
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Yuskovets M. K. 1956; Eradication de la brucellose en U,. R,. S,. S. Bull . Off. int. epizoot 46:366
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-6-1-67
Loading
/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-6-1-67
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most cited this month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error