Comparison of culture media for the laboratory diagnosis of chancroid

References

1. Coovadia Y. M., Kharsany A., Hoosen A. The microbial aetiology of genital ulcers in black men in Durban, South Africa. Genitourin Med 1985; 61:266–269
   [Google Scholar]
2. Plummer F. A., D’Costa L. J., Nsanze H. Clinical and microbiologic studies of genital ulcers in Kenyan women. Sex Transm Dis 1985; 12:193–197
   [Google Scholar]
3. Meheus A., Van Dyck E., Ursi J. P., Ballard R. C., Piot P. Etiology of genital ulcerations in Swaziland. Sex Transm Dis 1983; 10:33–35
   [Google Scholar]
4. Telzak E. E., Chiasson M. A., Bevier P. J., Stonebumer R. L., Castro K. G., Jaffe H. W. HIV-1 seroconversion in patients with and without genital ulcer disease. A prospective study. Ann Intern Med 1993; 119:1181–1186
   [Google Scholar]
5. Behets F. M.-T., Liomba G., Lule G. Sexually transmitted diseases and human immunodeficiency virus control in Malawi: a field study of genital ulcer disease. J Infect Dis 1995; 171:451–455
   [Google Scholar]
6. Orle K. A., Gates C. A., Martin D. H., Body B. A., Weiss J. B. Simultaneous PCR detection of Haemophilus ducreyi, Treponema pallidum, and Herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 from genital ulcers. J Clin Microbiol 1996; 34:49–54
   [Google Scholar]
7. Dylewski J., Nsanze H., Maitha G., Ronald A. Laboratory diagnosis of Haemophilus ducreyi: sensitivity of culture media. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 1986; 4:241–245
   [Google Scholar]
8. Macdonald K., Cameron D. W., Irungu G. Comparison of Sheffield media with standard media for the isolation of Haemophilus ducreyi. Sex Transm Dis 1989; 16:88–90
   [Google Scholar]
9. Dangor Y., Miller S. D., Koomhof H. J., Ballard R. C. A simple medium for the primary isolation of Haemophilus ducreyi. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 1992; 11:930–934
   [Google Scholar]
10. Chapel T. A., Brown W. J., Jeffres C., Stewart J. A. How reliable is the morphological diagnosis of penile ulcerations?. Sex Transm Dis 1977; 4:150–152
    [Google Scholar]
11. Sturm A. W. Clinical and bacteriological aspects of ulcus molle. PhD thesis University of Amsterdam; 1981
    [Google Scholar]
12. Totten P. A., Stamm W. E. Clear broth and plate media for culture of Haemophilus ducreyi. J Clin Microbiol 1994; 32:2019–2023
    [Google Scholar]
13. Duncan M. O., Bilgeri Y. R., Fehler H. G., Ballard R. C. The diagnosis of sexually acquired genital ulcerations in black patients in Johannesburg. S Afr Med J 1981; 1:20–23
    [Google Scholar]
14. Lockett A. E., Dance D. A. B., Mabey D. C. W., Drasar B. S. Serum-free media for isolation of Haemophilus ducreyi. Lancet 1991; 338:326
    [Google Scholar]
15. Nsanze H., Plummer F. A., Maggwa A. B. N. Comparison of media for the primary isolation of Haemophilus ducreyi. Sex Transm Dis 1984; 11:6–9
    [Google Scholar]
16. Sturm A. W., Zanen H. C. Characteristics of Haemophilus ducreyi in culture. J Clin Microbiol 1984; 19:672–674
    [Google Scholar]
17. Kunimoto D. Y., Slaney L., Koss J. Field testing of modified Bieling media for the isolation of Haemophilus ducreyi in Kenya. Eur J Clin Microbiol 1986; 5:673–675
    [Google Scholar]