1887

Abstract

An indirect ELISA was adapted to measure individual classes of anti-phosphatidylcholine (PC) antibodies in patients with brucellosis; a comparison was made with patients with other infectious diseases and healthy human controls. Immunoconjugates of α, γ or μ chain specificity were used. The results were compared with those of conventional tests for brucella antibodies, Rose Bengal, microagglutination (MAT) and Coombs tests, as well as with VDRL. The results indicated that although all sera from patients with brucellosis were VDRL negative, 97% of them (30 of 31) had higher levels of IgA or IgG anti-PC antibodies than the healthy control group. The IgM anti-PC antibodies isotype was not discriminatory between both groups. Seven sera (19%) from patients with other infections had values of IgG anti-PC higher than those of the healthy group; three of them were VDRL positive. The mean ELISA values of IgG and IgA anti-PC (serum diluted 1 in 1600) in the brucellosis and healthy groups were: IgG, 0.80 SEM 0.17 0.23 SEM 0.10; and IgA, 0.86 SEM 0.26 0.35 SEM 0.15. The sensitivity and specificity for the ELISA-PC were: IgG, 96.8% and 96.5%, respectively; IgA, 90.3% and 89.7%, respectively. Only one of 14 individuals clinically cured from brucellosis had significant IgG anti-PC antibodies. In contrast, all of these patients gave positive values in the conventional test for brucellosis. No correlation was found between the serum levels of IgA, IgG anti-PC by ELISA-PC and the results of the MAT or Coombs tests.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-47-1-49
1998-01-01
2024-03-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jmm/47/1/medmicro-47-1-49.html?itemId=/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-47-1-49&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Diaz R., Moriyon I. Laboratory techniques in the diagnosis of human brucellosis. In Young E. J., Corbel M. J. (eds) Brucellosis: clinical and laboratory aspects Boca Raton: FL, CRC Press; 198973–83
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Gamazo C., Vitas A. I., Lopez-Goni I., Diaz R., Moriyon I. Factors affecting detection of Brucella melitensis by BACTEC NR730, a nonradiometric system for hemocultures. J Clin Microbiol 1993; 31:3200–3203
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Pellicer T., Ariza J., Foz A., Pallarés R., Gudiol F. Specific antibodies detected during relapse of human brucellosis. J Infect Dis 1988; 157:918–924
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Domingo S., Diaz R., Gamazo C. Antibiotic treatment induces an increase of the specific antibody levels in Brucella melitensis infected mice. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 1995; 12:91–95
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Goldfine H. Bacterial membranes and lipid packing theory. J Lipid Res 1984; 25:1501–1507
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Gamazo C., Moriyon I. Release of outer membrane fragments by exponentially growing Brucella melitensis cells. Infect Immun 1987; 55:609–615
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Martinez de Tejada G., Moriyon I. The outer membranes of Brucella spp. are not barriers to hydrophobic permeants. J Bacteriol 1993; 175:5273–5275
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Voller A., Bidwell D., Bartlett A. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. In Rose N. R., Friedman H. (eds) Manual of clinical immunology 2nd edn Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology; 1980359–371
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Otero J. R., Fuertes A., Palenque E., Noriega A. R. Microtiter-adapted method that facilitates the Coombs test for brucellosis. J Clin Microbiol 1982; 16:737–738
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Morgan W. J. B., MacKinnon D. J., Lawson J. R., Cullen G. A. The rose bengal plate agglutination test in the diagnosis of brucellosis. Vet Rec 1969; 85:636–641
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Anonymous Manual of tests for syphilis. NCDC Venereal Diseases Program. US Department of Health; Washington, DC, US Government printing office: 1969
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Wicher K., Wicher V. Phospholipid antibodies in natural and experimental syphilis. In Harris E. N. (ed) Phospholipid-binding antibodies Boca Raton: FL, CRC Press; 199198–105
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Jakobsen P. H., Morris-Jones S. D., Hviid L. Anti-phospholipid antibodies in patients with Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Immunology 1993; 79:653–657
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Stem J. J., Ng R. H., Triplett D. A., McIntyre J. A. Incidence ofantiphospholipid antibodies in patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. Am J Clin Pathol 1994; 101:471–474
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Elkon K. B. Autoantibodies: their nature and significance. In Harris E. N. (ed) Phospholipid-binding antibodies Boca Raton: FL, CRC Press; 199159–72
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Nikaido H., Nakae T. The outer membrane of gram-negative bacteria. In Rose A. H., Morris J. G. (eds) Advances in microbial physiology vol 20 London: Academic Press; 1979163–250
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Moriyon I., Berman D. T. Isolation, purification, and partial characterization of Brucella abortus matrix protein. Infect Immun 1983; 39:394–402
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Bacon P. A., Davidson C., Smith B. Antibodies to Candida and autoantibodies in sub-acute bacterial endocarditis. Q J Med 1974; 43:537–550
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Tardieu M., Powers M. L., Hafler D. A., Hauser S. L., Weiner H. L. Autoimmunity following viral infection: demonstration of monoclonal antibodies against normal tissue following infection of mice with reovirus and demonstration of shared antigenicity between virus and lymphocytes. Eur J Immunol 1984; 14:561–565
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Vaarala O., Palosuo T., Kleemola M., Aho K. Anticardiolipin response in acute infections. Clin Immunol Immunopathol 1986; 41:8–15
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-47-1-49
Loading
/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-47-1-49
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error