1887

Abstract

Randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) fingerprints were generated with M13 and DAF4 primers for 25 isolates of spp. obtained from 16 different hospitals situated in 12 countries. The overall robustness of the algorithms and the reproducibility of the cluster analysis results generated by two commercially available computer programs (GelCompar and DENDRON) for analysing DNA fingerprinting gels were tested by examining the same set of fingerprinting data independently in two laboratories with the different software packages. Both programs were efficient at recognising and grouping strains with closely similar RAPD fingerprints, i.e., strains which might be expected to have a close epidemiological or evolutionary relationship. However, the relationships suggested for less closely related strains showed considerable variation in terms of the overall similarity or percentage correlation values suggested by the programs. It was concluded that both programs were useful tools for indicating close genotypic relationships between individual strains, but that epidemiological conclusions based on the similarity or correlation values (or the dendrograms derived from them) obtained for less closely related strains should be treated with considerable caution.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-46-4-314
1997-04-01
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jmm/46/4/medmicro-46-4-314.html?itemId=/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-46-4-314&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Maslow J. N., Mulligan M. E., Arbeit R. D. Molecular epidemiology: application of contemporary techniques to the typing of microorganisms. Clin Infect Dis 1993; 17:153–164
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Mayer L. W. Use of plasmid profiles in epidemiologic surveillance of disease outbreaks and in tracing the transmission of antibiotic resistance. Clin Microbiol Rev 1988; 1:228–243
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Owen R. J. Chromosomal DNA fingerprinting – a new method of species and strain identification applicable to microbial pathogens. J Med Microbiol 1989; 30:89–99
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Goering R. Molecular epidemiology of nosocomial infection: analysis of chromosomal restriction fragment patterns by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1993; 14:595–600
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bingen E., Denamur E., Elion J. Use of ribotyping in epidemiological surveillance of nosocomial outbreaks. Clin Microbiol Rev 1994; 7:311–327
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Van Belkum A. DNA fingerprinting of medically important microorganisms by use of PCR. Clin Microbiol Rev 1994; 7:174–184
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Grundmann H., Schneider C. H., Tichy H. V. Automated laser fluorescence analysis of randomly amplified polymorphic DNA: a rapid method for investigating nosocomial transmission of Acinetobacter baumannii . J Med Microbiol 1995; 43:446–451
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Webster C. A., Towner K. J., Humphreys H., Ehrenstein B., Hartung D., Grundmann H. Comparison of rapid automated laser fluorescence analysis of tDNA fingerprints with four other computer-assisted approaches for studying relationships between Acinetobacter baumannii isolates. J Med Microbiol 1996; 44:185–194
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Ehrenstein B., Bernards A. T., Dijkshoom L. Acinetobacter species identification using tRNA fingerprinting. J Clin Microbiol 1996; 34:2414–2420
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Wiedmann-Al-Ahmad M., Tichy H. V., Schon G. Characterization of Acinetobacter type strains and isolates obtained from wastewater treatment plants by PCR fingerprinting. Appl Environ Microbiol 1994; 60:4066–4071
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Struelens M. J. and the Members of the European Study Group on Epidemiological Markers (ESGEM) of the European Society for Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID). Consensus guidelines for appropriate use and evaluation of microbial epidemiologic typing systems. Clin Microbiol Infect 1996; 2:1–11
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Sneath P. H.A., Sokal R. R. Numerical taxonomy, the principles and practice of numerical classification. San Francisco: WH Freeman; 1973
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-46-4-314
Loading
/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-46-4-314
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error