1887

Abstract

is the causative agent of tularaemia. Effective antibiotic treatment of tularaemia is now available, but the early diagnosis of tularaemia remains a problem. Four primers (three pairs) were designed to detect by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR), based on the previously published nucleotide sequence of T-cell epitopes of a membrane protein. Amplification of purified chromosomal DNA with the three pairs of primers resulted in three different products with sizes consistent with those predicted from sequence data (211 bp, 347 bp and 568 bp). The specificity of the PCR was confirmed as no amplification was detected with a range of other bacteria. The sensitivity of the PCR was determined with limiting dilution PCR and viable counts. The preliminary application of the PCR to the detection of in aerosols and experimentally infected mice was investigated. Comparison of the results with those from traditional culture indicated that PCR was more sensitive. The animal challenge test showed that, 24 h after inoculation with 15 cfu of , 38 (82.6%) of 46 blood samples were positive by PCR, whereas only 22 (47.8%) were positive by culture. The results showed that PCR is a helpful tool for the detection of in blood, liver and spleen which should enable the rapid confirmation of clinical diagnoses of tularaemia.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-45-6-477
1996-12-01
2022-01-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jmm/45/6/medmicro-45-6-477.html?itemId=/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-45-6-477&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Hopla C. E. The ecology of tularemia. Adv Vet Sci Comp Med 1974; 18:25–53
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Olsufiev N. G., Emelyanova O. S., Dunayeva T. N. Comparative study of strains of B. tularense. II. Evaluation of criteria of virulence of Bacterium tularense in the old and the new world and their taxonomy. J Hyg Epidemiol Microbiol Immunol 1959; 3:138–149
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Tamvik A. Nature of protective immunity to Francisell tularensis . Rev Infect Dis 1989; 11:440–451
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Geisbert T. W., Jahrling P. B., Ezzel J. W. Use of immunoelectron microscopy to demonstrate Francisella tularensis . J Clin Microbiol 1993; 31:1936–1939
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Francis E., Evans A. C. Agglutination, cross-agglutination, and agglutinin absorption in tularemia. Public Health Rep 1926; 41:1273–1295
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Ransmeier J. C., Ewing C. L. The agglutination reaction in tularemia. J Infect Dis 1941; 69:193–205
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Kadull P. J., Reames H. R., Coriell L. L., Foshay L. Studies on tularemia. V Immunization of man. J Immunol 1950; 65:425–435
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Saslaw S., Carlisle H.N. Studies with tularemia vaccines in volunteers. IV Brucella agglutinins in vaccinated and nonvaccinated volunteers challenged with Pasteurella tularensis . Am J Med Sci 1961; 242:166–172
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Warring W. B., Ruffin J. S. A tick-borne epidemic of tularemia. N Engl J Med 1946; 234:137–140
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Snyder M. J. Immune response to Francisella . In Rose N. R., Friedman H. (eds) Manual of clinical immunology Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology; 1986377–378
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Koskela P., Herva E. Immunity against Francisella tularensis in north Finland. Scand J Infect Dis 1982; 14:195–199
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Behan K. A., Klein G. C. Reduction of Brucella species and Francisella tularensis cross-reacting agglutinins by dithiothreitol. J Clin Microbiol 1982; 16:756–757
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Provenza J. M., Klotz S. A., Penn R. L. Isolation of Francisella tularensis from blood. J Clin Microbiol 1986; 24:453–455
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Taylor J. P., Istre G. R., McChesney T. C., Satalow F. T., Parker R. L., McFarland L.M. Epidemiology characteristics of human tularemia in the southwest-central states, 1981-1987. Am J Epidemiol 1991; 133:1032–1038
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Saiki R. K., Scharf S., Faloona F. Enzymatic amplification of β-globin genomic sequence and restriction site analysis for diagnosis of sickle cell anemia. Science 1985; 230:1350–1354
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Sjӧstedt A., Sandstrӧm G., Tamvik A., Jaurin B. Nucelotide sequence and T cell epitopes of a membrane protein of Francisella tularensis . J Immunol 1990; 145:311–317
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Long G. W., Oprandy J. J., Nrayanan R. B., Fortier A. H., Porter K. R., Nacy C. A. Detection of Francisella tularensis in blood by polymerase chain reaction. J Clin Microbiol 1993; 31:152–154
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Overholt E. L., Tigertt W. D., Kadull P. J. An analysis of forty-two cases of laboratory-acquired tularemia. Treatment with broad spectrum antibiotics. Am J Med 1961; 30:785–806
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Bevanger L., Maeland J. A., Naess A. I. Agglutinins and antibodies to Francisella tularensis outer membrane antigens in the early diagnosis of disease during an outbreak of tularemia. J Clin Microbiol 1988; 26:433–437
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Syrjala H., Koskela P., Ripatti T., Salminen A., Herva E. Agglutination and ELISA methods in the diagnosis of tularemia in different clinical forms and severities of the disease. J Infect Dis 1986; 153:142–145
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Bevanger L., Maeland J. A., Naess A. I. Competitive enzyme immunoassay for antibodies to a 43,000-molecular-weight Francisella tularensis outer membrane protein for the diagnosis of tularemia. J Clin Microbiol 1989; 27:922–926
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Carlsson H. E., Lindberg A. A., Lindberg G., Hederstedt B., Karlsson, KA., Agell B.O. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for immunological diagnosis of human tularemia. J Clin Microbiol 1979; 10:615–621
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Mukoda T. J., Todd L. A., Sobsey M. D. PCR and gene probes for detecting bioaerosols. J Aerosol Sci 1994; 25:1523–1532
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Anthony L.S.D., Kongshavn P.A. L. Experimental murine tularemia caused by Francisella tularensis, live vaccine strain: a model of acquired cellular resistance. Microb Pathog 1987; 2:3–14
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-45-6-477
Loading
/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-45-6-477
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most cited this month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error