1887

Abstract

The biochemical characteristics of 213 isolates of from patients with melioidosis and 140 isolates from the soil in central and northeastern Thailand were compared. Whereas the biochemical profiles of all the clinical isolates were similar, all soil isolates from the central area and 25% of isolates from northeastern Thailand comprised a different phenotype. This was characterised by the ability to assimilate L-arabinose (100%), adonitol (100%), 5-keto-gluconate (90%) and D-xylose (84%), but failure to assimilate dulcitol (0%), erythritol (0%) and trehalose (10%). Compared with clinical isolates, these organisms had similar antibiotic susceptibility profiles and were also recognised by a specific polyclonal antibody against . As melioidosis is rare in central Thailand, but common in the northeast, this raises the possibility that this biochemical phenotype may be less virulent, or may even represent a different species.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-45-6-408
1996-12-01
2022-08-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jmm/45/6/medmicro-45-6-408.html?itemId=/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-45-6-408&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Dance D. A. B. Melioidosis: the tip of the iceberg?. Clin Microbiol Rev 1991; 4:52–60
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Chaowagul W., White N. J., Dance D. A. B. Melioidosis: a major cause of community-acquired septicemia in Northeastern Thailand. J Infect Dis 1989; 159:890–899
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Nachiangmai N., Patamasucon P., Tipayamonthien B., Kongpon A., Nakaviroj S. Pseudomonas pseudomallei in southern Thailand. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 1985; 16:83–87
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Smith M. D., Wuthiekanun V., Walsh A. L., White N. J. Quantitative recovery of Burkholderia pseudomallei from soil in Thailand. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 1995; 89:488–490
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Wuthiekanun V., Smith M. D., Dance D. A. B., White N. J. Isolation of Pseudomonas pseudomallei from soil in north-eastern Thailand. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 1995; 89:41–43
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Ashdown L. R. An improved screening technique for isolation of Pseudomonas pseudomallei from clinical specimens. Pathology 1979; 11:293–297
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Dance D. A. B., Wuthiekanun V., Naigowit P., White N. J. Identification of Pseudomonas pseudomallei in clinical practice: use of simple screening tests and API 20NE. J Clin Pathol 1989; 42:645–648
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Smith M. D., Wuthiekanun V., Walsh A. L., Pitt T. L. Latex agglutination test for the identification of Pseudomonas pseudomallei . J Clin Pathol 1993; 46:374–375
    [Google Scholar]
  9. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards Performance standards for antimicrobial disk susceptibility tests. 3rd edn; approved standard M2-A3 National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards; Villanova, PA: 1984
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Pitt T. L., Aucken H., Dance D. A. B. Homogeneity of lipopoly-saccharide antigens in Pseudomonas pseudomallei . J Infect 1992; 25:139–146
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Gillis M., Van T. V., Bardin R. Polyphasic taxonomy in the genus Burkholderia leading to an emended description of the genus and proposition of Burkholderia vietnamensis sp. nov. for N2-fixing isolates from rice in Vietnam. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1995; 45:274–289
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Yabuuchi E., Kosako Y., Oyaizu H. Proposal of Burkholderia gen. nov. and transfer of seven species of the genus Pseudomonas homology group II to the new genus, with the type species Burkholderia cepacia (Palleroni and Holmes 1981) comb. nov. Microbiol Immunol 1992; 36:1251–1275
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Urakami T., Ito-yoshida C., Araki H., Kijima T., Suzuki K., Komagata K. Transfer of Pseudomonas glumae to Burkholderia as Burkholderia spp. and description of Burkholderia vandii sp. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1994; 44:235–245
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Redfeam M. S., Palleroni N. J., Stanier R. Y. A comparative study of Pseudomonas pseudomallei and Bacillus mallei . J Gen Microbiol 1966; 43:293–313
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-45-6-408
Loading
/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-45-6-408
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most cited this month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error