1887

Abstract

SUMMARY

Affinity chromatography on polymyxin B-Sepharose 4B is one of the most commonly used methods for the removal of contaminating lipopolysaccharides (LPS). However, the LPS of spp. do not bind to polymyxin B. An affinity chromatography method with an anti-O antigen of LPS monoclonal antibody as immunosorbent was developed. The method produced a 1000-fold reduction in the LPS content of the cytoplasmic fraction of . The eluted proteins retained their antigenicity. The method, which uses mild physiological conditions, is simple, effective and reproducible.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-40-3-174
1994-03-01
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jmm/40/3/medmicro-40-3-174.html?itemId=/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-40-3-174&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Plommet M, Serre A, Fensterbank R. Vaccines,vaccination in brucellosis. AnnInst Pasteur Microbiol 1987; 138:117–121
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Pellicer T, Ariza J, Foz A, Pallares R, Gudiol F. Specific antibodies detected during relapse of human brucellosis. J Infect Dis 1988; 157:918–924
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Wright PF, Nielsen KH. Current and future serological methods. Adams L G. Advances in brucellosis research; Texas A and M University Press: 1990305–320
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Corbel MJ. Recent advances in the study of Brucella antigens and their serological cross-reactions. Vet Bull 1985; 55:927–942
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Winter AJ. Outer membrane proteins of Brucella. Ann Inst Pasteur Microbiol 1987; 138:87–89
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Moreno E, Berman DT, Boettcher LA. Biological activities of Brucella abortus lipopolysaccharides. Infect Immun 1981; 31:362–370
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Winter AJ, Verstreate DR, Hall CE. Immune response to porin in cattle immunized with whole cell, outer membrane, and outer membrane protein antigens of Brucella abortus combined with trehalose dimycolate and muramyl di-peptide adjuvants. Infect Immun 1983; 42:1159–1167
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Baldwin CL, Verstreate DR, Winter AJ. Immune response of cattle to Brucella abortus outer membrane proteins measured by lymphocyte blastogenesis. Vet Immunol Immuno-pathol 1985; 9:383–396
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Riezu-Boj JI, Moriyon I, Blasco JM, Gamazo C, Diaz R. Antibody response to Brucella ovis outer membrane proteins in ovine brucellosis. Infect Immun 1990; 58:489–94
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Bncker BJ, Tabatabai LB, Judge BA, Deyoe BL, Mayfield JE. Cloning, expression, and occurrence of the Brucella Cu-Zn superoxide dismutase. Infect Immun 1990; 58:2935–2939
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Lin J, Adams LG, Ficht TA. Characterization of the heat shock response in Brucella abortus and isolation of the genes encoding the GroE heat shock proteins. Infect Immun 1992; 60:2425–2431
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Verstreate DR, Creasy MT, Caveney NT, Baldwin CL, Blab MW, Winter AJ. Outer membrane proteins of Brucella abortus: isolation and characterization. Infect Immun 1982; 35:979–989
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Galfre G, Milstein C. Preparation of monoclonal antibodies: strategies and procedures. Methods Enzymol 1981; 73:3–16
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Voller A, Bidwell DE, Huldt G, Engvall E. A microplate method of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and its application to malaria. Bull World Health Organ 1974; 51:209–211
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Laemmli UK. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 1970; 227:680–685
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Tsang VCW, Peralta JN, Simons AR. Enzyme-linked immune electrotransfer blot techniques (EITB) for studying the specificities of antigens and antibodies separated by gel electrophoresis. Methods Enzymol 1983; 92:377–391
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Peterson GL. A simplification of the protein assay method of Lowry et al. which is more generally applicable. Anal Biochem 1977; 83:346–356
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Sullivan JD, Watson SW. Factors affecting the sensitivity of Limulus lysate. Appl Microbiol 1974; 28:1023–1026
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Mayer H, Weckesser J. “Unusual” Lipid A’s: structures, taxonomical relevance and potential value for endotoxin research. Rietschel E T. Handbook of endotoxin 1 Chemistry of endotoxin Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers BV; 1984221–247
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Issekutz AC. Removal of Gram-negative endotoxin from solutions by affinity chromatography. J Immunol Methods 1983; 61:275–281
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Karplus TE, Ulevitch RJ, Wilson CB. A new method for reduction of endotoxin contamination from protein solutions. J Immunol Methods 1987; 105:211–220
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Wilder JA, Cowdery JS, Ashman RF. The influence of lipopolysaccharide content on the apparent B cell stimulating activity of anti-μ preparations. J Immunol Methods 1988; 110:63–68
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Goldbaum FA, Rubbi CP, Wallach JC, Miguel SE, Baldi PC, Fossati CA. Differentiation between active and inactive human brucellosis by measuring antiprotein humoral immune responses. J Clin Microbiol 1992; 30:604–607
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-40-3-174
Loading
/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-40-3-174
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error