1887

Abstract

SUMMARY

Diphtheria toxin was titrated in primary cells, cell-lines and known tumour cell-cultures from nine animal species. The effects of toxin were assayed by the conventional cytotoxic test and by a dye-uptake method. Both tests placed the various cell-cultures in the same order of sensitivity to toxin, reflecting the sensitivity of the donor animals. The dye-uptake technique was found to be as reproducible as the cytotoxic test, and more precise, for calculating the sensitivity of cell cultures to diphtheria toxin.

Comparison of primary cells and cell-lines from the same animal species showed no constant pattern of sensitivity to toxin. For example, primary mouse cells were more sensitive than a mouse cell-line, and vice versa with rabbit cells. There was also variability in relative sensitivity of normal and tumour cells from the same species.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-4-4-519
1971-11-01
2024-04-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jmm/4/4/medmicro-4-4-519.html?itemId=/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-4-4-519&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Collier R. J. 1967; Effect of diphtheria toxin on protein synthesis: inactivation of one of the transfer factors. J. Molec. Biol. 25:83
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Collier R. J., Pappenheimer A. M. 1964; Studies on the mode of action of diphtheria toxin. II. Effect of toxin on amino acid incorporation in cell-free systems. J. Exp. Med. 120:1019
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Duncan J. L., Groman N. B. 1969; Activity of diphtheria toxin. II. Early events in the intoxication of HeLa cells. J. Bact. 98:963
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Finter N. B. 1969; Dye uptake methods for assessing viral cytopathogenicity and their application to interferon assays. J. Gen. Virol 5:419
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Gabliks Janis, Falconer Marcia. 1966; Interaction of diphtheria toxin with cell cultures from susceptible and resistant animals. J. Exp. Med. 123:723
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Gabliks Janis, Solotorovsky M. 1962; Cell culture reactivity to diphtheria, staphylococcus, tetanus and Escherichia coli toxins. J. Immun. 88:505
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Gasior E., Moldave K. 1965; Gel filtration studies with enzymes that catalyze amino acid incorporation from aminoacyl s-RNA into ribosomal protein. Biochim. biophys. Acta 95:679
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Lennox E. S., Kaplan A. S. 1957; Action of diphtheria toxin on cells cultivated in vitro. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 95:700
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Pappenheimer A. M. Jr, Brown R. 1968; Studies on the mode of action of diphtheria toxin. VI. Site of action of the toxin in living cells. J. Exp. Med. 127:1073
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Pappenheimer A. M., Collier R. J., Miller P. A. 1965; The effect of diphtheria toxin on the metabolism of mammalian cells in tissue culture. In Cell culture in the study of bacterial disease ed. by Solotorovsky M. New Brunswick: p 21
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Pope J. H., Rowe W. P. 1964; Detection of specific antigen in SV40-transformed cells by immunofluorescence. J. Exp. Med. 120:121
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Reed L. J., Muench H. 1938; A simple method for estimating 50 per cent, endpoints. Amer. J. Hyg. 27:493
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Solotorovsky M., Gabliks Janis. 1965; The biological action of diphtheria toxin in cell and tissue culture. In Cell culture in the study of bacterial disease ed. by Solotorovsky. New Brunswick: p 5
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Sousa C. P., Evans D. G. 1957; The action of diphtheria toxin on tissue cultures and its neutralization by antitoxin. Br. J. Exp. Path. 38:644
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-4-4-519
Loading
/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-4-4-519
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error