An electronmicroscope study of glycopeptide antibiotic-resistant strains of Staphylococcus epidermidis

References

1. Reynolds PE. Structure, biochemistry and mechanism of action of glycopeptide antibiotics. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 1989; 8:943–950
   [Google Scholar]
2. Griffith RS, Peck FB. Vancomycin, a new antibiotic. III. Preliminary clinical and laboratory studies. In: Welch H, Marti-Ibanez F. (eds) Antibiotics annual 1956-1957 New York: Medical Encyclopedia Inc.; 1956619–622
   [Google Scholar]
3. Johnson AP, Uttley AHC, Woodford N, George RC. Re sistance to vancomycin and teicoplanin: an emerging clinical problem. Clin Microbiol Rev 1990; 3:280–291
   [Google Scholar]
4. Courvalin P. Resistance of enterococci to glycopeptides. Anti-microb Agents Chemother 1990; 34:2291–2296
   [Google Scholar]
5. Shlaes DM, Bouvet A, Devine C, Shlaes JH, al-Obeid S, Williamson R. Inducible, transferable resistance to vancomycin in Enterococcus faecalis A256. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1989; 33:198–203
   [Google Scholar]
6. Leclercq R, Derlot E, Weber M, Duval J, Courvalin P. Transferable vancomycin and teicoplanin resistance in Enterococcus faecium. Antimicrob Aqents Chemother 1989; 33:10–15
   [Google Scholar]
7. Williamson R, al-Obeid S, Shlaes JH, Goldstein FW, Shlaes DM. Inducible resistance to vancomycin in Enterococcus faecium D366. J Infect Dis 1989; 159:1095–1104
   [Google Scholar]
8. Shlaes DM, Etter L, Gutmann L. Synergistic killing of vancomycin-resistant Enterococci of classes A, B, & C by combinations of vancomycin, penicillin and gentamicin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1991; 35:776–779
   [Google Scholar]
9. Archer GL. Antibiotic resistance in coagulase-negative staphylococci. In: Mardh PA, Schleifer KH. (eds) Co-agulase negative staphylococci Stockholm: Almquist and Wiksell International; 198693–101
   [Google Scholar]
10. Working Party of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemo therapy Diagnosis and management of peritonitis in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Lancet 1987; 1:845–849
    [Google Scholar]
11. Schwalbe RS, Stapleton JT, Gillingan PH. Emergence of vancomycin resistance in coagulase-negative staphylococci. N Engl J Med 1987; 316:927–931
    [Google Scholar]
12. Aubert G, Passot S, Lucht F, Dorche G. Selection of vancomycin-and teicoplanin-resistant Staphylococcus hae-molyticus during teicoplanin treatment of S. epidermidis infection. J Antimicrob Chemother 1990; 25:491–493
    [Google Scholar]
13. Veach LA, Pfaller MA, Barrett M, Koontz FP, Wenzel RP. Vancomycin resistance in Staphylococcus haemolyticus causing colonization and bloodstream infection. J Clin Microbiol 1990; 28:2064–2068
    [Google Scholar]
14. Sanyal D, Johnson AP, George RC, Cookson BD, Williams AJ. Peritonitis due to vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis. Lancet 1991; 337:54
    [Google Scholar]
15. Greenwood D, Bidgood K, Turner M. A comparison of the responses of staphylococci and streptococci to teicoplanin and vancomycin. J Antimicrob Chemother 1987; 20:155–164
    [Google Scholar]
16. Waterworth PM. Quantitative methods for bacterial sensitivity testing. In: Reeves DS, Phillips I, Williams JD, Wise R. (eds) Laboratory methods in antimicrobial chemotherapy Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 197831–40
    [Google Scholar]
17. Watson BW, Gauci CL, Blache L, O’Grady F. A simple turbidity cell for continuously monitoring the growth of bacteria. Phys Med Biol 1969; 14:555–558
    [Google Scholar]
18. Ryter A, Kellenberger E, Birch-Andersen A, Maaloe O. Etude au microscope electronique de plasmas contenant de l’acide desoxyribonucleique. Les nucleosides des bacteries en croissance active. Z Naturforsch 1958; 13:597–599
    [Google Scholar]
19. Mollenhauer HH. Plastic embedding mixtures for use in electron microscopy. Stain Technol 1964; 39:111–115
    [Google Scholar]
20. Reynolds ES. The use of lead citrate at high pH as an electron opaque stain in electron microscopy. J Cell Biol 1963; 17:208–213
    [Google Scholar]
21. Elliott TSJ, Greenwood D. The response of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to azlocillin, ticarcillin and cefsulodin. J Med Microbiol 1983; 16:351–362
    [Google Scholar]
22. Sanyal D, Johnson AP, George RC, Edwards R, Greenwood D. In-vitro characteristics of glycopeptide resistant strains of Staphylococcus epidermidis isolated from patients on CAPD. J Antimicrob Chemother (in press)
    [Google Scholar]
23. Schwalbe RS, Stapleton JT, Gilligan PH. Vancomycin-resistant staphylococcus. N Engl J Med 1987; 317:767–768
    [Google Scholar]
24. Daum RS, Gupta S, Sabbagh R, Milewski WM. Characterization of Staphylococcus aureus isolates with decreased susceptibility to vancomycin and teicoplanin: isolation and purification of a constitutively produced protein associated with decreased susceptibility. J Infect Dis 1992; 166:1066–1072
    [Google Scholar]
25. Greenwood D, O’Grady F. Antibiotic-induced surface changes in micro-organisms demonstrated by scanning electron microscopy. Science 1969; 163:1076–1077
    [Google Scholar]
26. Nishino T, Wecke J, Kruger D, Giesbrecht P. Trimethoprim-induced structural alterations in Staphylococcus aureus and the recovery of bacteria in drug-free medium. J Antimicrob Chemother 1987; 19:147–159
    [Google Scholar]
27. Hancock R, Fitz-James PC. Some differences in the action of penicillin, bacitracin and vancomycin on Bacillus mega-terium. J Bacteriol 1964; 87:1044–1050
    [Google Scholar]
28. Jordan DC, Inniss WE. Selective inhibition of ribonucleic acid synthesis in Staphylococcus aureus by vancomycin. Nature 1959; 184:1894–1895
    [Google Scholar]