1887

Abstract

Summary

Efferent lymph and peripheral blood collected from sheep experimentally infected with strain S48 were analysed for parasite DNA by amplification of the B1 and P30 genes by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The relative sensitivity of these two gene amplification methods was assessed and compared with parasite detection by mouse injection (MI). B1 PCR was consistently more sensitive than P30 PCR and the results agreed closely with those from MI. By contrast, P30 PCR gave more than twice as many false negatives results than B1 PCR. The few apparent false positive results given by either PCR method were probably due to the inability of MI to detect non-viable parasites. All specimens collected before infection with gave negative results by PCR and MI. Parasite DNA was detected by both B1 and P30 PCR in the lymph node of a sheep 12 days after infection but not in other tissues. The results permit a direct comparison between detection by P30 and B1 PCR. Moreover, they further confirm the value of PCR detection of toxoplasma as a sensitive, specific and reliable diagnostic and research tool.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-38-5-360
1993-05-01
2023-02-05
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jmm/38/5/medmicro-38-5-360.html?itemId=/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-38-5-360&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Savva D, Morris JC, Johnson JD, Holliman RE. Polymerase chain reaction for detection of Toxoplasma gondii . J Med Microbiol 1990; 32:25–31
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Burg JL, Grover CM, Pouletty P, Boothroyd JC. Direct and sensitive detection of a pathogenic protozoan, Toxoplasma gondii, by polymerase chain reaction. J Clin Microbiol 1989; 27:1787–1792
    [Google Scholar]
  3. van de Ven E, Melchers W, Galama J, Camps W, Meuwissen J. Identification of Toxoplasma gondii infections by B1 gene amplification. J Clin Microbiol 1991; 29:2120–2124
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Gross U, Roggenkamp A, Janitschke K, Heesemann J. Im proved sensitivity of the polymerase chain reaction for detection of Toxoplasma gondii in biological and human clinical specimens. Eur J Microbiol Infect Dis 1992; 11:33–39
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Grover CM, Thulliez P, Remington JS, Boothroyd JC. Rapid prenatal diagnosis of congenital toxoplasma infection using the polymerase chain reaction and amniotic fluid. J Clin Microbiol 1990; 28:2297–2301
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Johnson JD, Holliman RE, Sawa D. Detection of Toxoplasma gondii using the polymerase chain reaction. Biochem Soc Trans 1990; 18:665
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Dunouv-Camet J, Lavareda de Souza S, Rnnonntix MF et al. Preventing congenital toxoplasmosis (letter). Lancet 1990; 336:1018
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Holliman RE, Johnson JD, Sawa D. Diagnosis of cerebral toxoplasmosis in association with AIDS using the poly-merase chain reaction. Scand J Infect Dis 1990; 22:243–244
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Turner CB, Sawa D. Detection of Toxoplasma gondii in equine eyes (letter). Vet Rec 1991; 129:128
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Turner CB, Mohammed D, Sawa D. Detection of toxoplasma DNA in ovine samples (letter). Vet Rec 1991; 129:436
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Hall JG, Morris B. The output of cells in lymph from the popliteal node of sheep. Q J Exp Physiol 1962; 47:360–369
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Huang H-S, Buxton D, Burrells C, Anderson IE, Miller HRP. Immune responses of the ovine lymph node to Chlamydia psittaci. A cellular study of popliteal efferent lymph. J Comp Pathol 1991; 105:191–202
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Wilkins MF, O’Connell E, Te Punga WA. Toxoplasmosis in sheep 1. Effect of a killed vaccine on lambing losses caused by experimental challenge with Toxoplasma gondii . N Z Vet J 1987; 35:31–34
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Dyer M, Volpe F, Delves CJ, Somia N, Burns S, Scaife JG. Cloning and sequence of a ^-tubulin cDNA from Pneumocystis carinii: possible implications for drug therapy. Mol Microbiol 1992; 6:991–1001
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Monod M, Porchet S, Baudraz-Rosselet F, Frenk E. The identification of pathogenic yeast strains by electrophoretic analysis of their chromosomes. J Med Microbiol 1990; 32:123
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Denning DW, Clemons KV, Hanson LH, Stevens DA. Re striction endonuclease analysis of total cellular DNA of Aspergillus fumigatis isolates of geographically and epidemiological diverse origin. J Infect Dis 1990; 162:1151–1158
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Buxton D, Blewett DA, Trees AJ, McClogan C, Finlayson J. Further studies in the use of monensin in control of experimental ovine toxoplasmosis. J Comp Pathol 1988; 98:225
    [Google Scholar]
  18. McCullagh P, Nelder JA. Generalized linear models. New York: Chapman and Hall; 1983
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Payne RW, Lane PW, Ainsley AE et al. Genstat 5 reference manual. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1988
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Boothroyd JC, Burg JL, Nagel S et al. In Agabian N, Goodman H, Nogueira N. eds Molecular strategies of parasitic invasion. New York: A.R. Liss; 1987237–250
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Brezin AP, Egwuagu CE, Burnier et al. Identification of Toxoplasma gondii in paraffin-embedded sections by the polymerase chain reaction. Am J Ophthalmol 1990; 110:599–604
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Weiss LM, Chen Y-Y, Berry GJ, Strickler JG, Dorfman RF, Wamke RA. Infrequent detection of Toxoplasma gondiigenome in toxoplasmic lymphadenitis: a polymerase chain reaction study. Hum Pathol 1992; 23:154–158
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-38-5-360
Loading
/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-38-5-360
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most cited this month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error