1887

Abstract

Summary

An explant adult foreskin cell culture (FS2–3) was compared with human lung carcinoma cell culture (A549) with regard to the ability of to produce a cytopathic effect. The survival of for up to 26 days in FS2–3 cells was far greater than in any previously described in-vitro culture system. survived for up to 7 days in A549 cells. The cells grew and formed “fungal-like” microcolonies on the eukaryotic monolayer. Portions of the microcolonies remained attached despite extensive washing. Transmission electronmicroscopy indicated that, at 48 h after infection, the cells did not penetrate the FS2–3 cells but they were closely associated with them; there was only a 2–5 nm gap between the cell wall and the FS2–3 membrane. The virulent strains RO18 and 35000 produced a cytopathic effect on FS2–3 cells that did not appear to be due to a soluble toxin. These strains did not produce any CPE on A549 cells. and the avirulent strain CIP542, inoculated in the same concentration and incubated for the same length of time, did not produce CPE on FS2–3 cells. This study demonstrated that the use of FS2–3 foreskin cell culture provided an in-vitro approach for evaluating the cytopathic effect of virulent whereby, unlike in other in-vitro systems, viability of the micro-organism could be readily maintained.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-37-1-43
1992-07-01
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jmm/37/1/medmicro-37-1-43.html?itemId=/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-37-1-43&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Albritton W. L. Biology of Haemophilus ducreyi . Microbiol Rev 1989; 53:377–389
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Reenstiema J. Experimental soft chancre in rabbits. Urol Cutan Rev 1921; 25:332
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Feiner R. R., Mortara F. Infectivity of Haemophilus ducreyi for rabbit and development of skin hypersensitivity. Am J Syph Gonor Ven Dis 1945; 29:71–79
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Hammond G. W., Lian C. J., Wilt J. C., Ronald A. R. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Haemophilus ducreyi. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1978; 13:608–612
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Tuffrey M., Abeck D., Alexander F., Johnson A. P., Ballard R. C., Taylor-Robinson D. A mouse model of Haemophilus ducreyi infection (chancroid). FE MS Microbiol Lett 1988; 50:207–209
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Freinkel A. L. Histological aspects of sexually transmitted genital lesions. Histopathology 1987; 11:819–831
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Tuffrey M., Alexander F., Ballard R. C., Taylor-Robinson D. Characterization of skin lesions in mice following intradermal inoculation of Haemophilus ducreyi . J Exp Pathol 1990; 71:233–244
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Sturm A. W., Stolting G. J., Cormane R. H., Zanen H. C. Clinical and microbiological evaluation of 46 episodes of genital ulceration. Genitourin Med 1987; 63:98–101
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Morse S. A. Chancroid and Haemophilus ducreyi . Clin Microbiol Rev 1989; 2:137–157
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Abeck D., Korting H. C., Wagner R., Ballard R. C. Haemagglutin-ating properties of Haemophilus ducreyi . Lett Appl Microbiol 1990; 11:45–47
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Roberts M., Jacobs R. F., Haas J. E., Smith A. L. Adherence of Haemophilus influenzae to monkey respiratory tissue in organ culture. J Gen Microbiol 1984; 130:1437–1447
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-37-1-43
Loading
/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-37-1-43
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error