1887

Abstract

Summary

Possible colonies in cultures of sputum samples are currently identified by tests for dependence on X and V factors. This method requires further overnight culture and may give a relatively high number of false negative results. Identification of suspected colonies by a 5-min test for production of indole and β-galactosidase followed by a 1-h porphyrin test was compared with tests for dependence on X and V factors. A commercially produced form of the rapid tests (Haemstrip®, Lab M, Bury, Lancs) was used to test 252 potential haemophilus colonies from cultures of sputum samples on heated blood agar. Colonies that were β-galactosidase-positive after 5 min were considered to be non- and those that were β-galactosidase-negative but indolepositive were considered to be . At this stage the test had a sensitivity of 99.4% and a specificity of 90.9%. After 1 h, only colonies that were β-galactosidase-and porphyrinnegative were considered to be , the sensitivity was then 99.5% and the specificity 100%. Similar results were found with colonies from sputum cultures on selective heated blood agar containing bacitracin. The X and V dependence and Haemstrip results were in 97.6% agreement in a double blind test. Of 100 non-haemophilus colonies tested by Haemstrip, two pseudomonads could have been identified as by this method. The high positive predictive value of Haemstrip results depends partly on the initial recognition of potential haemophilus colonies.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-35-1-49
1991-07-01
2022-01-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jmm/35/1/medmicro-35-1-49.html?itemId=/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-35-1-49&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Kilian M. A taxonomie study of the genus Haemophilus, with the proposal of a new species. J Gen Microbiol 1976; 93:9–62
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Pohl S. DNA relatedness among members of Haemophilus,Pasteurella, and Actinobacillus. Kilian M, Frederiksen W, Biberstein EL. eds Haemophilus, Pasteurella, and Actinobacillus London: Academic Press; 1981245–253
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Kilian M. Haemophilus. Lennette EH, Balows A, Hausier WJ, Shadomy HJ. eds Manual of clinical microbiology, 4th. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology; 1985387–393
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Lennette EH, Balows A, Hausier WJ, Shadomy HJ. eds Manual of clinical microbiology, 4th. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology; 1985
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Black CT, Kupferschmid JP, West KW, Grosfeld JL. Haemo-philus parainfluenzae infections in children, with the report of a unique case. Rev Infect Dis 1988; 10:342–346
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Matthews JS, Reynolds JA, Weesner DE, Perry JL, Jenkins AL. Rapid species identification and biotyping of respiratory isolates of Haemophilus spp. J Clin Microbiol 1983; 18:472–475
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-35-1-49
Loading
/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-35-1-49
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most cited this month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error